|
|
|
date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:57:03 GMT,
group: uk.rec.models.radio-control.air
back
Blade MSR
Hi folks
I received my E-Flite Blade MSR today.
Nippy little bugger!!!!!!!!! 8^)
It flew well in a light breeze in my garden - thrown around a bit by
the breeze, but given the size and weight, I am surprised it coped as
well as it did (Conditions were a bit marginal but I couldn't resist
trying it outside). A bit twitchy compared to the MCX and the rudder
control is a bit fierce, but overall I would recommend it.
However, I have just noticed that, when viewed directly from the rear,
the main shaft is not square and is at an approximate 5 degrees angle
clockwise. It flies well with the trims more or less central and
there is no sign of damage or stress to the mainframe so I am guessing
this is a design feature to aid hovering rather than a result of
accidentally landing in the bushes a couple of times, although I
cannot find any mention of this offset in the instructions and didn't
notice it when I received the heli.
Regards
KGB
date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:57:03 GMT
author: KGB (KGB)
|
Re: Blade MSR
KGB (KGB) wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I received my E-Flite Blade MSR today.
>
> Nippy little bugger!!!!!!!!! 8^)
>
> It flew well in a light breeze in my garden - thrown around a bit by
> the breeze, but given the size and weight, I am surprised it coped as
> well as it did (Conditions were a bit marginal but I couldn't resist
> trying it outside). A bit twitchy compared to the MCX and the rudder
> control is a bit fierce, but overall I would recommend it.
>
> However, I have just noticed that, when viewed directly from the rear,
> the main shaft is not square and is at an approximate 5 degrees angle
> clockwise. It flies well with the trims more or less central and
> there is no sign of damage or stress to the mainframe so I am guessing
> this is a design feature to aid hovering rather than a result of
> accidentally landing in the bushes a couple of times, although I
> cannot find any mention of this offset in the instructions and didn't
> notice it when I received the heli.
>
> Regards
>
>
> KGB
>
is it designed like that so it hovers both skids level???
--
Kevin R
Reply address works
date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:32:29 +0100
author: Kevin
|
Re: Blade MSR
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:32:29 +0100, Kevin
wrote:
>KGB (KGB) wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I received my E-Flite Blade MSR today.
>>
>> Nippy little bugger!!!!!!!!! 8^)
>>
>> It flew well in a light breeze in my garden - thrown around a bit by
>> the breeze, but given the size and weight, I am surprised it coped as
>> well as it did (Conditions were a bit marginal but I couldn't resist
>> trying it outside). A bit twitchy compared to the MCX and the rudder
>> control is a bit fierce, but overall I would recommend it.
>>
>> However, I have just noticed that, when viewed directly from the rear,
>> the main shaft is not square and is at an approximate 5 degrees angle
>> clockwise. It flies well with the trims more or less central and
>> there is no sign of damage or stress to the mainframe so I am guessing
>> this is a design feature to aid hovering rather than a result of
>> accidentally landing in the bushes a couple of times, although I
>> cannot find any mention of this offset in the instructions and didn't
>> notice it when I received the heli.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> KGB
>>
>is it designed like that so it hovers both skids level???
>
Hi Kevin
That's my guess, but the instructions don't mention anything about it.
I also have a Hirobo Quark and have just realized that the left skid
has built in lugs which gives the main shaft a 5 degree offset similar
to the MSR to enable a vertical take-off without any aileron input;
unlike E-Flite, Hirobo do describe this in the instructions.
To date, the Blade MSR has had no more than 3 or 4 "unexpected
arrivals" - all lightweight affairs and certainly no heavy landings -
but I just want to double check the mainshaft offset is intentional;
as I said, I didn't notice the offset on the MSR until after the first
few flights.
Regards
KGB
date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:37:16 GMT
author: KGB (KGB)
|
|
|