Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Has anybody had one of these,
http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
Paul
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:54:53 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Cambrian have got back to me and...............
Mk 9 Spitfire engine is .40.to .46 2 stroke
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:42:08 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Cambrian have got back to me and...............
Mk 9 Spitfire engine is .40.to .46 2 stroke
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:42:08 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Cambrian have got back to me and...............
Mk 9 Spitfire engine is .40.to .46 2 stroke
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:42:08 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Cambrian have got back to me and...............
Mk 9 Spitfire engine is .40.to .46 2 stroke
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:42:08 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:39 +0100
author: Tim Duke
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Malcolm Fisher wrote:
> "Paul" wrote in message
> news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
>> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
> Malcolm
No..this ain't the fun fighters..its bigger'n'better. 5lb 55" span thing.
Fun fighters were about 40" IIRC
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:57 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Tim Duke" wrote in message
news:5crbtpF307tj5U1@mid.individual.net...
> I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if
> that's
> what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
> ballistic.
>
Yes, they did the 15-25 size funfighters, but they also did larger versions
of the spit and mustang. I had a super tigre 60 in my mustang; flew very
nicely.
They were called Cambrian models, then changed their name to Cambrian
Direct. Looks like they are no longer trading - obviously couldn't compete
with todays ARTF prices!!!
Tim
This spit is a described as a mid sized spit with a larger and a smaller
(funfighter) size in thier range. The site is branded Cambrian Model
Company, and has a feedback form which I have just filled in looking for a
reply from that.
I will let the group know if I get a reply.
Cheers
Paul
date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:29:15 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Cambrian have got back to me and...............
Mk 9 Spitfire engine is .40.to .46 2 stroke
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:42:08 +0100
author: Paul
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
Paul wrote:
> Has anybody had one of these,
>
> http://www.shop.edirectory.co.uk/cambrian_models/3104/mia/d/radio+control+plane+spitfire+mkix+kit/pid/5317241
>
> I am thinking of getting one but I have asked via email what engine is
> recommended, and tried calling them but no reply to either.
>
> Doesn't bode well for a sale, but I am still interested what engine would be
> good for it maybe an OS52 surpass?
>
> Paul
>
>
At that size and weight its a generic '40 powered' thing..
My need a heavyish engine to balance anyway.
I am sure a 52 will be OK.
date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Cambrian Mk1X Spitfire
"Paul" wrote in message
news:kO6dnT5ohp-_nfXbnZ2dnUVZ8vednZ2d@bt.com...
> Has anybody had one of these,
I'vce no personal experience, but IIRC the Cambrian fun fighters - if that's
what your Spit is - were designed for 25 size engines so a 52 would be
ballistic.
Malcolm
>
>
>
date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:09:12 +0100
author: Malcolm Fisher
|
