On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:24:39 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
 wrote:

>X-No-Archive YES

No need to shout :o)

You could try

 X-No-Archive: yes

If that doesn't work,
-- 

Martin

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:36:59 -0800 (PST), Judith in France wrote:

> X-No-Archive: yes
> 
> I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.
> I'm trying to use the no archive as someone recently posted something
> I posted using a lot of judicial cutting and pasting, out of context,
> showing a post that actually resembled nothing like the original so I
> have taken advice of some regulars who say use the no archive.  Martin
> I got your email but I still can't make head or tail of it!!

anyone who has a mind to can still show your posts if they reply to yours
and not snip tho Judith.  Also they can add stuff to your post that way too,
so although I persoally use the x no rachive option it doesn't really man a
great deal security wise. I don't know why I leave my option via 40tude in
place really - just forget it's there until I read something like this.  
-- 
Live each day as it it was your last, as one day it will be.
http://ariesval.co.uk/val/

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:45:24 +0000, Aries wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:36:59 -0800 (PST), Judith in France wrote:
> 
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> 
>> I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.
>> I'm trying to use the no archive as someone recently posted something
>> I posted using a lot of judicial cutting and pasting, out of context,
>> showing a post that actually resembled nothing like the original so I
>> have taken advice of some regulars who say use the no archive.  Martin
>> I got your email but I still can't make head or tail of it!!
> 
> anyone who has a mind to can still show your posts if they reply to yours
> and not snip tho Judith.  Also they can add stuff to your post that way too,
> so although I persoally use the x no rachive option it doesn't really man a
> great deal security wise. I don't know why I leave my option via 40tude in
> place really - just forget it's there until I read something like this.

Excuse typos :eek:
-- 
It is because we are different that each of us is special.
http://ariesval.co.uk/val/

Judith in France wrote:
> On Nov 3, 11:46 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:24:39 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>
>>  wrote:
>>> X-No-Archive YES
>> No need to shout :o)
>>
>> You could try
>>
>>  X-No-Archive: yes
>>
>> If that doesn't work,
>> --
>>
>> Martin
> 
> X-No-Archive: yes
> 
> I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.
> I'm trying to use the no archive as someone recently posted something
> I posted using a lot of judicial cutting and pasting, out of context,
> showing a post that actually resembled nothing like the original so I
> have taken advice of some regulars who say use the no archive.  Martin
> I got your email but I still can't make head or tail of it!!
> 
> Judith

That might be possible by reposting but any original on Google cannot be 
altered. It is for that reason that anyone wishing to prove the truth of 
a post always includes headers so that the original may be checked 
against any tampered copies.
I doubt anyone needing to prove a point would use anything but the 
original or their attempts at the truth would be sorely compromised.

Bobbie

-- 
http://thingamabobs.co.uk/imagesofcanfordheath7.html

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:36:59 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
 wrote:

>On Nov 3, 11:46 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:24:39 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>
>>  wrote:
>> >X-No-Archive YES
>>
>> No need to shout :o)
>>
>> You could try
>>
>>  X-No-Archive: yes
>>
>> If that doesn't work,

>X-No-Archive: yes
>
>I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.

What you put doesn't have the colon in it.
-- 

Martin

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:01:24 +0000, Bobbie wrote:

> Judith in France wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 11:46 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:24:39 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>>
>>>  wrote:
>>>> X-No-Archive YES
>>> No need to shout :o)
>>>
>>> You could try
>>>
>>>  X-No-Archive: yes
>>>
>>> If that doesn't work,
>>> --
>>>
>>> Martin
>> 
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> 
>> I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.
>> I'm trying to use the no archive as someone recently posted something
>> I posted using a lot of judicial cutting and pasting, out of context,
>> showing a post that actually resembled nothing like the original so I
>> have taken advice of some regulars who say use the no archive.  Martin
>> I got your email but I still can't make head or tail of it!!
>> 
>> Judith
> 
> That might be possible by reposting but any original on Google cannot be 
> altered. It is for that reason that anyone wishing to prove the truth of 
> a post always includes headers so that the original may be checked 
> against any tampered copies.
> I doubt anyone needing to prove a point would use anything but the 
> original or their attempts at the truth would be sorely compromised.
> 
> Bobbie

I hadn't thought of that Bobbie, good point.  
-- 
What other people think of you is none of your business.
http://ariesval.co.uk/val/

Aries wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:01:24 +0000, Bobbie wrote:
> 
>> Judith in France wrote:
>>> On Nov 3, 11:46 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:24:39 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>>>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>> X-No-Archive YES
>>>> No need to shout :o)
>>>>
>>>> You could try
>>>>
>>>>  X-No-Archive: yes
>>>>
>>>> If that doesn't work,
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>>>
>>> I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.
>>> I'm trying to use the no archive as someone recently posted something
>>> I posted using a lot of judicial cutting and pasting, out of context,
>>> showing a post that actually resembled nothing like the original so I
>>> have taken advice of some regulars who say use the no archive.  Martin
>>> I got your email but I still can't make head or tail of it!!
>>>
>>> Judith
>> That might be possible by reposting but any original on Google cannot be 
>> altered. It is for that reason that anyone wishing to prove the truth of 
>> a post always includes headers so that the original may be checked 
>> against any tampered copies.
>> I doubt anyone needing to prove a point would use anything but the 
>> original or their attempts at the truth would be sorely compromised.
>>
>> Bobbie
> 
> I hadn't thought of that Bobbie, good point.  


Then again the No archive option will only make the original available 
for 6 days to anyone wishing to make copies, but I do believe that they 
are still available to Google should there be any need of verification.
I think Judith has stated that someone has been tampering with her 
posts. It would be easy enough to check, just by comparing it to her 
originals that are still available and archived.

Bobbie


-- 
http://thingamabobs.co.uk/imagesofcanfordheath7.html

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:51:33 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
 wrote:

>On Nov 3, 3:18 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:36:59 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>
>>
>>
>>  wrote:
>> >On Nov 3, 11:46 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:24:39 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>
>> >>  wrote:
>> >> >X-No-Archive YES
>>
>> >> No need to shout :o)
>>
>> >> You could try
>>
>> >>  X-No-Archive: yes
>>
>> >> If that doesn't work,
>> >X-No-Archive: yes
>>
>> >I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.
>>
>> What you put doesn't have the colon in it.
>> --
>>
>> Martin
>
>X-No-Archive: yes
>
>Now you tell me, I just looked at your email, it doesn't have it there
>either!!!  

I know.

>I'll try again but you know me :-))

I do? :o)
-- 

Martin

"Judith in France"  wrote in message 
news:e89d1a45-4f14-4139-b53a-fce59789ebff@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 3, 11:46 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:24:39 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>
>  wrote:
> >X-No-Archive YES
>
> No need to shout :o)
>
> You could try
>
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
> If that doesn't work,
> --
>
> Martin

X-No-Archive: yes

I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.
I'm trying to use the no archive as someone recently posted something
I posted using a lot of judicial cutting and pasting, out of context,
showing a post that actually resembled nothing like the original so I
have taken advice of some regulars who say use the no archive.  Martin
I got your email but I still can't make head or tail of it!!

    Ooh what fun:)  Please may I have it too?

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:57:29 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
 wrote:

>On Nov 3, 5:08 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:51:33 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>
>>
>>
>>  wrote:
>> >On Nov 3, 3:18 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:36:59 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>
>> >>  wrote:
>> >> >On Nov 3, 11:46 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:24:39 -0800 (PST), Judith in France
>>
>> >> >>  wrote:
>> >> >> >X-No-Archive YES
>>
>> >> >> No need to shout :o)
>>
>> >> >> You could try
>>
>> >> >>  X-No-Archive: yes
>>
>> >> >> If that doesn't work,
>> >> >X-No-Archive: yes
>>
>> >> >I put it in the first line of text, as you can see it doesn't work.
>>
>> >> What you put doesn't have the colon in it.
>> >> --
>>
>> >> Martin
>>
>> >X-No-Archive: yes
>>
>> >Now you tell me, I just looked at your email, it doesn't have it there
>> >either!!!  
>>
>> I know.
>>
>> >I'll try again but you know me :-))
>>
>> I do? :o)
>> --
>>
>> Martin
>
>I think so :-)
>
>I've tried it in the first line now I will try it in the header and
>see what happens!!!

If you knew how to put it in the header why did you put it in your message?
-- 

Martin