On 12 aug, 00:57, "Boedi...@isp.com"  wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2:33 am, Ollie Clark  wrote:
>
> > Boedi...@isp.comwrote:
> > > On Aug 3, 10:57 pm, Phil Stovell  wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:13:57 -0700, Boedi...@isp.comwrote:
> > >> >     Only morons use drugs of any kind. They are useless
> > >> >    to themselves and their country, weaklings who go through
> > >> >   life avoiding and refusing to face reality.
>
> > >> Do you want tobacco and alcohol made illegal?
>
> > >  It wouldn't make any difference to me since i don't smoke
> > >  and drink alcohol  only on certain occasions, new Year's
> > >  Eve e.g.  However,  drug addicts are always attempting
> > >  to use alcohol users as an excuse for their drug habit
> > >  when they have nothing in common.  Even if one gets
> > >  drunk they will soon sober up,  drugs like pot stay in
> > >  the bloodstream and  cause future problems.  Women
> > >  pass it on to their unborn and they also invariably result
> > >  in harder drugs being used.  Many traffic accidents are
> > >  caused by pot users as you well now, because I've
> > >  posted the details here. I have never understood why
> > >  anyone would want to use mind altering drugs for any
> > >  purpose.  Thank God this isn't 1939 and Britain would have
> > >  to rely on all the stoned out of their gourd idiots who
> > > can't get through life without a crutch.
>
> > Ah, you are a troll.
>
>  More drivel from some stoned out of his gills pothead.

The most prominent driveling nutcase in this discussion is you.

>
> > Well done, you reeled me in with your other
> > post but you've made yourself look far too uninformed in this one
> > to be taken seriously.
>
>  I suggest you read The Evening Standard  of August 12th. 2007. Then
> get back to me with your defence of these vile
>  people who can't get through life without drugs.
>
>  "Peter McKenzie Seaton".   Remember the name, you
>  pathetic excuse for a man.
>

Just because some schmuck does some vile things under the influence
of pot (or while being frustrated about not having access to pot),
that doesn't
mean other pot users are responsible or have to justify their pot
habit.
I suppose if Peter McKenzie Seaton happened to be a coffee drinker you
would jump to the conclusion that all coffee drinkers must be child
molesters?