ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
turbines which could power thousands of homes.

They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.

The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
large village.

While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.

But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
raping local women and even girls and boys.

--

Malcolm

MAOgilvie@indaal.co.uk wrote:
> ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> turbines which could power thousands of homes.
> 
> They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
> 
> The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> large village.
> 
> While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
> 
> But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> raping local women and even girls and boys.
> 
> --
> 
> Malcolm

You sound like a religious drama queen.
Nothing wrong with being an atheist, it's the dirty old
vicars and priests who can hide behind their cassocks, while
all the time, many are paedophiles. Another dirty vicar was
caught last week with 50,000 images of the most disgusting
kiddy torture pictures ever seen.

Gonad

On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
 wrote:
> ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>
> They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>
> The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> large village.
>
> While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>
> But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> raping local women and even girls and boys.

Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:

http://richarddawkins.net/

On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
wrote:
> On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>
>
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>
> > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>
> > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> > large village.
>
> > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>
> > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>
> Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
> listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>
> http://richarddawkins.net/- Hide quoted text -
>

No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!

On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
wrote:
> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>
> >  wrote:
> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>
> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>
> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> > > large village.
>
> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>
> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>
> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>
> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>
> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!

This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.

John M. wrote:
> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>
>> >  wrote:
>> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>
>> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>
>> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>> > > large village.
>>
>> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>
>> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>
>> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>
>> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>>
>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> 
> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.

You'll not be warned again.
-- 
ah

On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
wrote:
> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> wrote:

>
> > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>

Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
here. Just trust me on this one.

On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
wrote:
> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > wrote:
>
> > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>
> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> here. Just trust me on this one.

The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
for thee.

joblard@hushmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>> wrote:
>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
>> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
>> here. Just trust me on this one.
> 
> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> for thee.

Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.

Gonad

On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > wrote:
> >> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> >>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
> >> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> >> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> >> here. Just trust me on this one.
>
> > The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> > for thee.
>
> Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.

Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.

On Sep 30, 4:12 pm, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>
> > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> > here. Just trust me on this one.
>
> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> for thee.

Metaphysical, man!

On Sep 30, 4:19 pm, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > > On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"  > >>> wrote:
> > >>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> > >>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.> > >> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> > >> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> > >> here. Just trust me on this one.
>
> > > The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> > > for thee.
>
> > Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.
>
> Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.

ROLF! I tink I'll buy a Skoda to be on the safe side.

PS - it's for charity.

joblard@hushmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>>>> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
>>>> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
>>>> here. Just trust me on this one.
>>> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
>>> for thee.
>> Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.
> 
> Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.
> 

Except on tuesdays: rule 16, volume 3, chapter 4,page 9, paragraph 8.

Gonad

On Sep 30, 9:25 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> >> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"  >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> >>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.> >>>> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> >>>> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> >>>> here. Just trust me on this one.
> >>> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> >>> for thee.
> >> Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.
>
> > Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.
>
> Except on tuesdays: rule 16, volume 3, chapter 4,page 9, paragraph 8.

Mornington Crescent!

joblard@hushmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 9:25 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>>>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>>>>>> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
>>>>>> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
>>>>>> here. Just trust me on this one.
>>>>> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
>>>>> for thee.
>>>> Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.
>>> Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.
>> Except on tuesdays: rule 16, volume 3, chapter 4,page 9, paragraph 8.
> 
> Mornington Crescent!


Route 66!

Gonad

On Sep 30, 9:30 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 30, 9:25 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> >> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> >>>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"  >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> >>>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
> >>>>>> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> >>>>>> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> >>>>>> here. Just trust me on this one.
> >>>>> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> >>>>> for thee.
> >>>> Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.
> >>> Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.
> >> Except on tuesdays: rule 16, volume 3, chapter 4,page 9, paragraph 8.
>
> > Mornington Crescent!
>
> Route 66!

Highway 61 (Revisted)!

On 30 Sep, 09:33, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 9:30 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>
>
>
> > jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > > On Sep 30, 9:25 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> > >> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > >>> On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> > >>>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > >>>>> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> > >>>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
> > >>>>>> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> > >>>>>> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> > >>>>>> here. Just trust me on this one.
> > >>>>> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> > >>>>> for thee.
> > >>>> Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.
> > >>> Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.
> > >> Except on tuesdays: rule 16, volume 3, chapter 4,page 9, paragraph 8> > > Mornington Crescent!
>
> > Route 66!
>
> Highway 61 (Revisted)!

Isn't that the road to nowhere?

mobyduck

On Sep 30, 9:37 am, spitonf...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 30 Sep, 09:33, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 30, 9:30 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>
> > > jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Sep 30, 9:25 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> > > >> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > > >>> On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> > > >>>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> > > >>>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
> > > >>>>>> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> > > >>>>>> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> > > >>>>>> here. Just trust me on this one.
> > > >>>>> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> > > >>>>> for thee.
> > > >>>> Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.
> > > >>> Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.
> > > >> Except on tuesdays: rule 16, volume 3, chapter 4,page 9, paragraph 8.
>
> > > > Mornington Crescent!
>
> > > Route 66!
>
> > Highway 61 (Revisted)!
>
> Isn't that the road to nowhere?

No; you're thinking of the A552.

joblard@hushmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 9:37 am, spitonf...@googlemail.com wrote:
>> On 30 Sep, 09:33, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 30, 9:30 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>>>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 30, 9:25 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>>>>>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 9:17 am, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>>>>>>>> jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>>>>>>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
>>>>>>>>>> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
>>>>>>>>>> here. Just trust me on this one.
>>>>>>>>> The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
>>>>>>>>> for thee.
>>>>>>>> Ticking is not allowed, unless followed by a tock.
>>>>>>> Tocking without the owner's consent is illegal.
>>>>>> Except on tuesdays: rule 16, volume 3, chapter 4,page 9, paragraph 8.
>>>>> Mornington Crescent!
>>>> Route 66!
>>> Highway 61 (Revisted)!
>> Isn't that the road to nowhere?
> 
> No; you're thinking of the A552.

Sorry, satnav's fucked.

Gonad

On Sep 30, 9:23 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
wrote:
> On Sep 30, 4:12 pm, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"  > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> > > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.> > > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> > > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> > > here. Just trust me on this one.
>
> > The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> > for thee.
>
> Metaphysical, man!

Stick a fork in me, I'm Donne.

On Sep 30, 5:14 pm, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 9:23 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 30, 4:12 pm, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"  > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> > > > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>
> > > > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> > > > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> > > > here. Just trust me on this one.
>
> > > The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
> > > for thee.
>
> > Metaphysical, man!
>
> Stick a fork in me, I'm Donne

I can only Marvell!

Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
> On Sep 30, 5:14 pm, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 9:23 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 30, 4:12 pm, jobl...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > > On Sep 30, 4:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
>> > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>
>> > > > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>>
>> > > > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
>> > > > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
>> > > > here. Just trust me on this one.
>>
>> > > The clock is ticking ... send not to ask for whom it ticks, it ticks
>> > > for thee.
>>
>> > Metaphysical, man!
>>
>> Stick a fork in me, I'm Donne
> 
> I can only Marvell!

'Ewas a goode chap, Man.
-- 
ah

On Sep 30, 5:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
wrote:
> On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > wrote:
>
> > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>
> Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> here. Just trust me on this one.

I wouldn't trust you on a zero, never mind one.

On Oct 2, 3:55 am, "John M."  wrote:
> On Sep 30, 5:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>
> > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> > here. Just trust me on this one.
>
> I wouldn't trust you on a zero, never mind one.

You have been warned, John. You are not welcome here. Pay attention to
what you are told.

John M. wrote:
> On Oct 2, 7:31 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> wrote:
>> On Oct 2, 3:55 am, "John M."  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 30, 5:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>
>> > > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>>
>> > > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
>> > > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
>> > > here. Just trust me on this one.
>>
>> > I wouldn't trust you on a zero, never mind one.
>>
>> You have been warned, John. You are not welcome here. Pay attention to
>> what you are told.
> 
> Get lost, or I'll send the Flying Spaghetti Monster to make you an
> offer you can't refuse.

The clock is ticking...
-- 
ah

On Oct 5, 3:29 am, ah  wrote:
> John M. wrote:
> > On Oct 2, 7:31 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > wrote:
> >> On Oct 2, 3:55 am, "John M."  wrote:
>
> >> > On Sep 30, 5:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> >> > > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>
> >> > > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> >> > > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> >> > > here. Just trust me on this one.
>
> >> > I wouldn't trust you on a zero, never mind one.
>
> >> You have been warned, John. You are not welcome here. Pay attention to
> >> what you are told.
>
> > Get lost, or I'll send the Flying Spaghetti Monster to make you an
> > offer you can't refuse.
>
> The clock is ticking...

Obviously not a NIST-F1.

On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
> John M. wrote:
> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > wrote:
> >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>
> >> >  wrote:
> >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>
> >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>
> >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> >> > > large village.
>
> >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>
> >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> >> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>
> >> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
> >> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>
> >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>
> >> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>
> You'll not be warned again.

Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.

On Oct 10, 3:17 pm, "John M." 
wrote:
> On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > John M. wrote:
> > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>
> > >> >  wrote:
> > >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> > >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>
> > >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> > >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>
> > >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> > >> > > large village.
>
> > >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>
> > >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> > >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> > >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> > >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> > >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> > >> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>
> > >> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
> > >> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>
> > >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>
> > >> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>
> > You'll not be warned again.
>
> Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
> forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
> short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.- Hide quoted text -
>

Refusal to cease dawking noted.

This is a clear and present danger to demon.local.

Don't say you weren't warned. Now you must take the consequences. I
trust you will accept them in a manly, stiff-upper-lipped fashion,
without mewling or bawling, without puking in panic, without recourse
to prayer. Just as we took the strap from the Christian Brothers.

Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
> On Oct 10, 3:17 pm, "John M." 
> wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> John M. wrote:
>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>> ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>>>>>>> turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>>>>>> They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>>>>>>> of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>>>>>> The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>>>>>>> large village.
>>>>>>> While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>>>>>> But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>>>>>>> island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>>>>>>> to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>>>>>>> beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>>>>>>> influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>>>>>>> raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>>>>> Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>>>>>> listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>>>>> http://richarddawkins.net/
>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>>> You'll not be warned again.
>> Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
>> forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
>> short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.- Hide quoted text -
>>
> 
> Refusal to cease dawking noted.
> 
> This is a clear and present danger to demon.local.
> 
> Don't say you weren't warned. Now you must take the consequences. I
> trust you will accept them in a manly, stiff-upper-lipped fashion,
> without mewling or bawling, without puking in panic, without recourse
> to prayer. Just as we took the strap from the Christian Brothers.

Theres nothing worse than being dawked.

On Oct 13, 8:10 pm, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
> > On Oct 10, 3:17 pm, "John M." 
> > wrote:
> >> On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>
> >>> John M. wrote:
> >>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
> >>>>>>  wrote:
> >>>>>>> ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> >>>>>>> turbines which could power thousands of homes.
> >>>>>>> They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> >>>>>>> of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
> >>>>>>> The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> >>>>>>> large village.
> >>>>>>> While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts> >>>>>>> But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> >>>>>>> island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> >>>>>>> to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> >>>>>>> beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> >>>>>>> influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> >>>>>>> raping local women and even girls and boys.
> >>>>>> Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
> >>>>>> listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
> >>>>>>http://richarddawkins.net/
> >>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> >>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
> >>> You'll not be warned again.
> >> Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
> >> forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
> >> short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > Refusal to cease dawking noted.
>
> > This is a clear and present danger to demon.local.
>
> > Don't say you weren't warned. Now you must take the consequences. I
> > trust you will accept them in a manly, stiff-upper-lipped fashion,
> > without mewling or bawling, without puking in panic, without recourse
> > to prayer. Just as we took the strap from the Christian Brothers.
>
> Theres nothing worse than being dawked.
>

Yes there is, I imagine. Being homo-ed?

Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
> On Oct 13, 8:10 pm, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
>>> On Oct 10, 3:17 pm, "John M." 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>>>>> John M. wrote:
>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>>>>>>>>> turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>>>>>>>> They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>>>>>>>>> of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>>>>>>>> The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>>>>>>>>> large village.
>>>>>>>>> While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>>>>>>>> But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>>>>>>>>> island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>>>>>>>>> to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>>>>>>>>> beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>>>>>>>>> influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>>>>>>>>> raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>>>>>>> Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>>>>>>>> listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>>>>>>> http://richarddawkins.net/
>>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>>>>> You'll not be warned again.
>>>> Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
>>>> forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
>>>> short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.- Hide quoted text -
>>> Refusal to cease dawking noted.
>>> This is a clear and present danger to demon.local.
>>> Don't say you weren't warned. Now you must take the consequences. I
>>> trust you will accept them in a manly, stiff-upper-lipped fashion,
>>> without mewling or bawling, without puking in panic, without recourse
>>> to prayer. Just as we took the strap from the Christian Brothers.
>> Theres nothing worse than being dawked.
>>
> 
> Yes there is, I imagine. Being homo-ed?
> 
Puke!

On Oct 14, 7:02 pm, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
> > On Oct 13, 8:10 pm, Naked Gonad  wrote:
> >> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
> >>> On Oct 10, 3:17 pm, "John M." 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
> >>>>> John M. wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
> >>>>>>>>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> >>>>>>>>> turbines which could power thousands of homes.
> >>>>>>>>> They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> >>>>>>>>> of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
> >>>>>>>>> The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> >>>>>>>>> large village.
> >>>>>>>>> While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
> >>>>>>>>> But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> >>>>>>>>> island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> >>>>>>>>> to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> >>>>>>>>> beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> >>>>>>>>> influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> >>>>>>>>> raping local women and even girls and boys.
> >>>>>>>> Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
> >>>>>>>> listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
> >>>>>>>>http://richarddawkins.net/
> >>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
> >>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please> >>>>> You'll not be warned again.
> >>>> Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
> >>>> forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
> >>>> short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.- Hide quoted text -
> >>> Refusal to cease dawking noted.
> >>> This is a clear and present danger to demon.local.
> >>> Don't say you weren't warned. Now you must take the consequences. I
> >>> trust you will accept them in a manly, stiff-upper-lipped fashion,
> >>> without mewling or bawling, without puking in panic, without recourse
> >>> to prayer. Just as we took the strap from the Christian Brothers.
> >> Theres nothing worse than being dawked.
>
> > Yes there is, I imagine. Being homo-ed?
>
> Puke!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

PYPOSTFU!

Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
> On Oct 14, 7:02 pm, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
>>> On Oct 13, 8:10 pm, Naked Gonad  wrote:
>>>> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 10, 3:17 pm, "John M." 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>>>>>>> John M. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>>>>>>>>>>> turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>>>>>>>>>> They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>>>>>>>>>>> of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>>>>>>>>>> The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>>>>>>>>>>> large village.
>>>>>>>>>>> While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>>>>>>>>>> But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>>>>>>>>>>> island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>>>>>>>>>>> to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>>>>>>>>>>> beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>>>>>>>>>>> influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>>>>>>>>>>> raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>>>>>>>>> Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>>>>>>>>>> listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>>>>>>>>> http://richarddawkins.net/
>>>>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>>>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>>>>>>> You'll not be warned again.
>>>>>> Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
>>>>>> forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
>>>>>> short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>> Refusal to cease dawking noted.
>>>>> This is a clear and present danger to demon.local.
>>>>> Don't say you weren't warned. Now you must take the consequences. I
>>>>> trust you will accept them in a manly, stiff-upper-lipped fashion,
>>>>> without mewling or bawling, without puking in panic, without recourse
>>>>> to prayer. Just as we took the strap from the Christian Brothers.
>>>> Theres nothing worse than being dawked.
>>> Yes there is, I imagine. Being homo-ed?
>> Puke!- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> PYPOSTFU!

Whatever that means.

John M. wrote:
> On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>> John M. wrote:
>> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>
>> >> >  wrote:
>> >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>> >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>
>> >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>> >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>
>> >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>> >> > > large village.
>>
>> >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>
>> >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>> >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>> >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>> >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>> >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>> >> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>
>> >> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>> >> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>
>> >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>>
>> >> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>
>> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>>
>> You'll not be warned again.
> 
> Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
> forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
> short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.

demon.local is not a "web site"

We take things very seriously--nay, stringently--here in demon.local

Why, we've been known to "plonk" a stray poster, or two, merely for their
impulsive x-posting fuckwittery.  Our software handles such incidentals,
magnificently.

demon.local is a robust wibble group, and we don't take kindly to outsiders
imposing their sense of order on things.

Get with the Program, or FOAD.
-- 
ah

John M. wrote:
> On Oct 5, 3:29 am, ah  wrote:
>> John M. wrote:
>> > On Oct 2, 7:31 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Oct 2, 3:55 am, "John M."  wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Sep 30, 5:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
>> >> > > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> >> > > > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>
>> >> > > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>>
>> >> > > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
>> >> > > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
>> >> > > here. Just trust me on this one.
>>
>> >> > I wouldn't trust you on a zero, never mind one.
>>
>> >> You have been warned, John. You are not welcome here. Pay attention to
>> >> what you are told.
>>
>> > Get lost, or I'll send the Flying Spaghetti Monster to make you an
>> > offer you can't refuse.
>>
>> The clock is ticking...
> 
> Obviously not a NIST-F1.

*plonk*
-- 
ah

On Oct 15, 9:22 am, ah  wrote:
> John M. wrote:
> > On Oct 5, 3:29 am, ah  wrote:
> >> John M. wrote:
> >> > On Oct 2, 7:31 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> On Oct 2, 3:55 am, "John M."  wrote:
>
> >> >> > On Sep 30, 5:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >> > > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M."  >> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> >> > > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> >> > > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> >> >> > > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>
> >> >> > > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
> >> >> > > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
> >> >> > > here. Just trust me on this one.
>
> >> >> > I wouldn't trust you on a zero, never mind one.
>
> >> >> You have been warned, John. You are not welcome here. Pay attention to
> >> >> what you are told.
>
> >> > Get lost, or I'll send the Flying Spaghetti Monster to make you an
> >> > offer you can't refuse.
>
> >> The clock is ticking...
>
> > Obviously not a NIST-F1.
>
> *plonk*

I'm about to plonk the troll but I'll give him one last chance before
the clock *really* starts ticking.
After that, I'll set the dogs on him. Then the Hereford boys. Then
Craig. Then Ben. Then JK. And finally, I'll get Chrith Hill to pay him
a visit. He should be afarid, very afarid.
We are dl. We are robots. Robost, I mean.

[froup re-stored]

John M. wrote:
> On Oct 15, 3:22 am, ah  wrote:
>> John M. wrote:
>> > On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>> >> John M. wrote:
>> >> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>
>> >> >> >  wrote:
>> >> >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>> >> >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>
>> >> >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>> >> >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>
>> >> >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>> >> >> > > large village.
>>
>> >> >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>
>> >> >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>> >> >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>> >> >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>> >> >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>> >> >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>> >> >> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>
>> >> >> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>> >> >> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>
>> >> >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>>
>> >> >> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>
>> >> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>>
>> >> You'll not be warned again.
>>
>> > Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
>> > forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
>> > short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.
>>
>> demon.local is not a "web site"
> 
> Is this some sort of divine revelation from an imaginary sky fairy
> that variously goes by the name of Yahweh, Allah or the all-purpose,
> three-in-one, wholly spirit cleansing agent?

We're immune to such bandying-about of religiosity.

This is a rubust group.

> 
>> We take things very seriously--nay, stringently--here in demon.local
> 
> That must be tough to do on Usenet. Net nannies are among life's most
> notable failures.

Were it but true that the general populace was cognizant of the fruits of NNTP.

Alas, this relegates such activity to a statistically-insignificant dollop of
abhorrence, swirling in the septic systems of small--yet highly successful--ISPs.

Like Demon, for instance.

> 
>> Why, we've been known to "plonk" a stray poster, or two, merely for their
>> impulsive x-posting fuckwittery.
> 
> So you're all plonkers on this ng, eh?

Mostly Tony and Ben, but Crag's been known to explore his Advanced Properties
dialogue, on occasion.

> 
> Our software handles such incidentals,
> 
> Life must be tough if you can't get a stiffie.

Stiffies are proscribed in demon.local

It's our only Rule.

Please see the FAQ'n Charter.

> 
>> magnificently.
>>
>> demon.local is a robust wibble group, and we don't take kindly to outsiders
>> imposing their sense of order on things.
>>
>> Get with the Program, or FOAD.
> 
>  Yes. I'll head back to the sanity of:
> 
> http://richarddawkins.net/

This is a very confusing site . . . is it a resource for meth addicts seeking
digital salvation?
-- 
ah

Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
> On Oct 15, 4:09 pm, "John M." 
> wrote:
>> On Oct 15, 3:22 am, ah  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > John M. wrote:
>> > > On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>> > >> John M. wrote:
>> > >> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>> > >> >> wrote:
>>
>> > >> >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>
>> > >> >> >  wrote:
>> > >> >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>> > >> >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>
>> > >> >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>> > >> >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>
>> > >> >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>> > >> >> > > large village.
>>
>> > >> >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>
>> > >> >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>> > >> >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>> > >> >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>> > >> >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>> > >> >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>> > >> >> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>
>> > >> >> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>> > >> >> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>
>> > >> >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>>
>> > >> >> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>
>> > >> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>>
>> > >> You'll not be warned again.
>>
>> > > Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
>> > > forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
>> > > short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.
>>
>> > demon.local is not a "web site"
>>
>> Is this some sort of divine revelation from an imaginary sky fairy
>> that variously goes by the name of Yahweh, Allah or the all-purpose,
>> three-in-one, wholly spirit cleansing agent?
>>
>> > We take things very seriously--nay, stringently--here in demon.local
>>
>> That must be tough to do on Usenet. Net nannies are among life's most
>> notable failures.
>>
>> > Why, we've been known to "plonk" a stray poster, or two, merely for their
>> > impulsive x-posting fuckwittery.
>>
>> So you're all plonkers on this ng, eh?
>>
>> Our software handles such incidentals,
>>
>> Life must be tough if you can't get a stiffie.
>>
>> > magnificently.
>>
>> > demon.local is a robust wibble group, and we don't take kindly to outsiders
>> > imposing their sense of order on things.
>>
>> > Get with the Program, or FOAD.
>>
>>  Yes. I'll head back to the sanity of:
>>
>> http://richarddawkins.net/- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> Troll! Atheist! Bastard! Stirrer! Faker! Sanity-faker! Kunt!
> 
> We don't like your kind in demon.local, with your fundamentalist
> agenda and your strange hobbies.
> May the Lord have mercy on your soul.

BURN HIM!!1!
-- 
ah

John M. wrote:
> On Oct 15, 4:02 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> wrote:
>> On Oct 15, 9:22 am, ah  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > John M. wrote:
>> > > On Oct 5, 3:29 am, ah  wrote:
>> > >> John M. wrote:
>> > >> > On Oct 2, 7:31 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >> On Oct 2, 3:55 am, "John M."  wrote:
>>
>> > >> >> > On Sep 30, 5:51 am, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > >> >> > wrote:
>>
>> > >> >> > > On Sep 30, 6:21 am, "John M." 
>> > >> >> > > wrote:
>>
>> > >> >> > > > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> > >> >> > > > wrote:
>>
>> > >> >> > > > > No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>
>> > >> >> > > > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.-
>>
>> > >> >> > > Oh, dear. These people never learn, do they?
>> > >> >> > > No-one, but no-one is exempt from the Rule. You *will* cease posting
>> > >> >> > > here. Just trust me on this one.
>>
>> > >> >> > I wouldn't trust you on a zero, never mind one.
>>
>> > >> >> You have been warned, John. You are not welcome here. Pay attention to
>> > >> >> what you are told.
>>
>> > >> > Get lost, or I'll send the Flying Spaghetti Monster to make you an
>> > >> > offer you can't refuse.
>>
>> > >> The clock is ticking...
>>
>> > > Obviously not a NIST-F1.
>>
>> > *plonk*
>>
>> I'm about to plonk the troll but I'll give him one last chance before
>> the clock *really* starts ticking.
>> After that, I'll set the dogs on him. Then the Hereford boys. Then
>> Craig. Then Ben. Then JK. And finally, I'll get Chrith Hill to pay him
>> a visit. He should be afarid, very afarid.
>> We are dl. We are robots. Robost, I mean.
> 
> Ooo. My last chance before you turn a bunch of fanatical net nannies
> loose, is it. They're probably a load of repressed wankers, in which
> case they need to read:
> 
> http://www.sexinchrist.com/masturbation.html

IAWTP :D
-- 
ah

ah wrote:
> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
>> On Oct 15, 4:09 pm, "John M." 
>> wrote:
>>> On Oct 15, 3:22 am, ah  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> John M. wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>>>>>> John M. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>>>>>>>>>> turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>>>>>>>>> They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>>>>>>>>>> of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>>>>>>>>> The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>>>>>>>>>> large village.
>>>>>>>>>> While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>>>>>>>>> But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>>>>>>>>>> island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>>>>>>>>>> to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>>>>>>>>>> beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>>>>>>>>>> influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>>>>>>>>>> raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>>>>>>>> Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>>>>>>>>> listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>>>>>>>> http://richarddawkins.net/
>>>>>>>> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>>>>>> This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>>>>>> You'll not be warned again.
>>>>> Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
>>>>> forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
>>>>> short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.
>>>> demon.local is not a "web site"
>>> Is this some sort of divine revelation from an imaginary sky fairy
>>> that variously goes by the name of Yahweh, Allah or the all-purpose,
>>> three-in-one, wholly spirit cleansing agent?
>>>
>>>> We take things very seriously--nay, stringently--here in demon.local
>>> That must be tough to do on Usenet. Net nannies are among life's most
>>> notable failures.
>>>
>>>> Why, we've been known to "plonk" a stray poster, or two, merely for their
>>>> impulsive x-posting fuckwittery.
>>> So you're all plonkers on this ng, eh?
>>>
>>> Our software handles such incidentals,
>>>
>>> Life must be tough if you can't get a stiffie.
>>>
>>>> magnificently.
>>>> demon.local is a robust wibble group, and we don't take kindly to outsiders
>>>> imposing their sense of order on things.
>>>> Get with the Program, or FOAD.
>>>  Yes. I'll head back to the sanity of:
>>>
>>> http://richarddawkins.net/- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>> Troll! Atheist! Bastard! Stirrer! Faker! Sanity-faker! Kunt!
>>
>> We don't like your kind in demon.local, with your fundamentalist
>> agenda and your strange hobbies.
>> May the Lord have mercy on your soul.
> 
> BURN HIM!!1!

Gas mark 9?

On Oct 16, 1:22 am, ah  wrote:
> [froup re-stored]
>
>
>
> John M. wrote:
> > On Oct 15, 3:22 am, ah  wrote:
> >> John M. wrote:
> >> > On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
> >> >> John M. wrote:
> >> >> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>
> >> >> >> >  wrote:
> >> >> >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> >> >> >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>
> >> >> >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> >> >> >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>
> >> >> >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> >> >> >> > > large village.
>
> >> >> >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>
> >> >> >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> >> >> >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> >> >> >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> >> >> >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> >> >> >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> >> >> >> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>
> >> >> >> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
> >> >> >> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>
> >> >> >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>
> >> >> >> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> >> >> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>
> >> >> You'll not be warned again.
>
> >> > Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
> >> > forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
> >> > short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.
>
> >> demon.local is not a "web site"
>
> > Is this some sort of divine revelation from an imaginary sky fairy
> > that variously goes by the name of Yahweh, Allah or the all-purpose,
> > three-in-one, wholly spirit cleansing agent?
>
> We're immune to such bandying-about of religiosity.
>
> This is a rubust group.
>
>
>
> >> We take things very seriously--nay, stringently--here in demon.local
>
> > That must be tough to do on Usenet. Net nannies are among life's most
> > notable failures.
>
> Were it but true that the general populace was cognizant of the fruits of NNTP.
>
> Alas, this relegates such activity to a statistically-insignificant dollop of
> abhorrence, swirling in the septic systems of small--yet highly successful--ISPs.
>
> Like Demon, for instance.
>
>
>
> >> Why, we've been known to "plonk" a stray poster, or two, merely for their
> >> impulsive x-posting fuckwittery.
>
> > So you're all plonkers on this ng, eh?
>
> Mostly Tony and Ben, but Crag's been known to explore his Advanced Properties
> dialogue, on occasion.
>
>
>
> > Our software handles such incidentals,
>
> > Life must be tough if you can't get a stiffie.
>
> Stiffies are proscribed in demon.local
>
> It's our only Rule.
>
> Please see the FAQ'n Charter.
>
>
>
> >> magnificently.
>
> >> demon.local is a robust wibble group, and we don't take kindly to outsiders
> >> imposing their sense of order on things.
>
> >> Get with the Program, or FOAD.
>
> >  Yes. I'll head back to the sanity of:
>
> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>
> This is a very confusing site . . . is it a resource for meth addicts seeking
> digital salvation?

Perhaps. However, digital salvation is best described in:

http://www.sexinchrist.com/fist.html

John M. wrote:
> On Oct 16, 1:22 am, ah  wrote:
>> [froup re-stored]
>>
>>
>>
>> John M. wrote:
>> > On Oct 15, 3:22 am, ah  wrote:
>> >> John M. wrote:
>> >> > On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>> >> >> John M. wrote:
>> >> >> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>
>> >> >> >> >  wrote:
>> >> >> >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>> >> >> >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>> >> >> >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>> >> >> >> > > large village.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>> >> >> >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>> >> >> >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>> >> >> >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>> >> >> >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>> >> >> >> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
>> >> >> >> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>>
>> >> >> >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>>
>> >> >> >> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>>
>> >> >> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>>
>> >> >> You'll not be warned again.
>>
>> >> > Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
>> >> > forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
>> >> > short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.
>>
>> >> demon.local is not a "web site"
>>
>> > Is this some sort of divine revelation from an imaginary sky fairy
>> > that variously goes by the name of Yahweh, Allah or the all-purpose,
>> > three-in-one, wholly spirit cleansing agent?
>>
>> We're immune to such bandying-about of religiosity.
>>
>> This is a rubust group.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> We take things very seriously--nay, stringently--here in demon.local
>>
>> > That must be tough to do on Usenet. Net nannies are among life's most
>> > notable failures.
>>
>> Were it but true that the general populace was cognizant of the fruits of NNTP.
>>
>> Alas, this relegates such activity to a statistically-insignificant dollop of
>> abhorrence, swirling in the septic systems of small--yet highly successful--ISPs.
>>
>> Like Demon, for instance.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Why, we've been known to "plonk" a stray poster, or two, merely for their
>> >> impulsive x-posting fuckwittery.
>>
>> > So you're all plonkers on this ng, eh?
>>
>> Mostly Tony and Ben, but Crag's been known to explore his Advanced Properties
>> dialogue, on occasion.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Our software handles such incidentals,
>>
>> > Life must be tough if you can't get a stiffie.
>>
>> Stiffies are proscribed in demon.local
>>
>> It's our only Rule.
>>
>> Please see the FAQ'n Charter.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> magnificently.
>>
>> >> demon.local is a robust wibble group, and we don't take kindly to outsiders
>> >> imposing their sense of order on things.
>>
>> >> Get with the Program, or FOAD.
>>
>> >  Yes. I'll head back to the sanity of:
>>
>> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>>
>> This is a very confusing site . . . is it a resource for meth addicts seeking
>> digital salvation?
> 
> Perhaps. However, digital salvation is best described in:
> 
> http://www.se******st.com/fist.html

Keep this FILTH out of demon.local!
-- 
ah

On Oct 19, 3:34 pm, ah  wrote:
> John M. wrote:
> > On Oct 16, 1:22 am, ah  wrote:
> >> [froup re-stored]
>
> >> John M. wrote:
> >> > On Oct 15, 3:22 am, ah  wrote:
> >> >> John M. wrote:
> >> >> > On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
> >> >> >> John M. wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>
> >> >> >> >> >  wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
> >> >> >> >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
> >> >> >> >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
> >> >> >> >> > > large village.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
> >> >> >> >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
> >> >> >> >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
> >> >> >> >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
> >> >> >> >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
> >> >> >> >> > > raping local women and even girls and boys.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Fortunately the atheism will help counter all those ills you have
> >> >> >> >> > listed before and after it. As you will see when you visit:
>
> >> >> >> >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>
> >> >> >> >> No dawking in demon.local! It's the Rule!
>
> >> >> >> > This is Usenet and I'm posting to uk.r.b, so I'll do what I please.
>
> >> >> >> You'll not be warned again.
>
> >> >> > Good. So in that case I'll take it the later post in your name is a
> >> >> > forgery. You wouldn't lie about such things, would you? Liars get
> >> >> > short shrift when they place comments at the web site above.
>
> >> >> demon.local is not a "web site"
>
> >> > Is this some sort of divine revelation from an imaginary sky fairy
> >> > that variously goes by the name of Yahweh, Allah or the all-purpose,
> >> > three-in-one, wholly spirit cleansing agent?
>
> >> We're immune to such bandying-about of religiosity.
>
> >> This is a rubust group.
>
> >> >> We take things very seriously--nay, stringently--here in demon.local
>
> >> > That must be tough to do on Usenet. Net nannies are among life's most
> >> > notable failures.
>
> >> Were it but true that the general populace was cognizant of the fruits of NNTP.
>
> >> Alas, this relegates such activity to a statistically-insignificant dollop of
> >> abhorrence, swirling in the septic systems of small--yet highly successful--ISPs.
>
> >> Like Demon, for instance.
>
> >> >> Why, we've been known to "plonk" a stray poster, or two, merely for their
> >> >> impulsive x-posting fuckwittery.
>
> >> > So you're all plonkers on this ng, eh?
>
> >> Mostly Tony and Ben, but Crag's been known to explore his Advanced Properties
> >> dialogue, on occasion.
>
> >> > Our software handles such incidentals,
>
> >> > Life must be tough if you can't get a stiffie.
>
> >> Stiffies are proscribed in demon.local
>
> >> It's our only Rule.
>
> >> Please see the FAQ'n Charter.
>
> >> >> magnificently.
>
> >> >> demon.local is a robust wibble group, and we don't take kindly to outsiders
> >> >> imposing their sense of order on things.
>
> >> >> Get with the Program, or FOAD.
>
> >> >  Yes. I'll head back to the sanity of:
>
> >> >http://richarddawkins.net/
>
> >> This is a very confusing site . . . is it a resource for meth addicts seeking
> >> digital salvation?
>
> > Perhaps. However, digital salvation is best described in:
>
> >http://www.sexinchrist.com/fist.html
>
> Keep this FILTH out of demon.local!

How can you speak of the "son of Gob(TM)" like that.

John M. wrote:
> On Oct 19, 3:34 pm, ah  wrote:
>> John M. wrote:
>> > On Oct 16, 1:22 am, ah  wrote:
>> >> [froup re-stored]
>>
>> >> John M. wrote:
>> >> > On Oct 15, 3:22 am, ah  wrote:
>> >> >> John M. wrote:
>> >> >> > On Sep 30, 1:21 am, ah  wrote:
>> >> >> >> John M. wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On Sep 29, 7:20 pm, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" 
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Sep 30, 12:10 am, "John M." 
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Sep 29, 10:32 am, "MAOgil...@indaal.co.uk"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >  wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > > ScottishPower has identified chosen the Sound of Islay to test sea
>> >> >> >> >> > > turbines which could power thousands of homes.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > They have been working on the Lanstrom device, which is said to be one
>> >> >> >> >> > > of the world's most advanced tidal turbines.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > The sites would host up to 60 of the turbines, generating power for a
>> >> >> >> >> > > large village.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > While they insist that birds will be unaffected, I have my doubts.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > But what is really worrisome is the effects of the construction on the
>> >> >> >> >> > > island here. Similar projects have in the past brought untold misery
>> >> >> >> >> > > to the locals, and ruined the dream of those who have retired to
>> >> >> >> >> > > beautiful places. It's not merely the increased traffic, but the huge
>> >> >> >> >> > > influx of labour bringing gambling, drugs, syphilis and atheism, and
>> >> >> >>