B&O Industry Ltd. is a high technology company which focus on the
design and manufacture of car DVD, MP3/MP4 and GPS.

Our products hot sell all over the world. Single din car dvd with
features  touch screen, detachable face panel and USB/SD/MMC/MP4/DVD/
CD/FM/AM /DIVX/TV FUNCTION and so on.

Also Our company have double din, flip-down, sunvisor and rear view.
You will always find interested products in our website.

Our website: www.oembo.com  or http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/szoembo

mails: sales@oembo.com   salesbo@gmail.com

Can you tell us what B&O stands for please ?

Your company logo strongly resembles that of the Bang & Olufsen
company.
Coincidence ??


Dezza.

"dezza"  wrote in message 
news:1174771763.843273.41470@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Can you tell us what B&O stands for please ?
>
> Your company logo strongly resembles that of the Bang & Olufsen
> company.
> Coincidence ??

You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it to 
the whole group????? Should have been an email!

"Axel VK"   wrote:


> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it to
> the whole group?????


^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.


Should have been an email!


^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????

Dezza.

"dezza"  wrote in message 
news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>
>
>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>> to
>> the whole group?????
>
>
> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.

Thats an assumption on your part.

> Should have been an email!
>
>
> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????

So other people know not to make the same mistake.

"Axel VK"  wrote in message 
news:46063bcb$0$7428$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "dezza"  wrote in message 
> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>
> Thats an assumption on your part.


And your assuming the opposite :-)


>
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>
> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, "Axel VK"  wrote:

>
>"dezza"  wrote in message 
>news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>
>Thats an assumption on your part.

Why, some of us might like to know.
I wouldn't send any emails to anyone in case of future spam.

>
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>
>So other people know not to make the same mistake. 
>

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:

> "dezza"  wrote in message 
> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
> 
> Thats an assumption on your part.

And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!


> 
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
> 
> So other people know not to make the same mistake.

So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
know......right?

"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>
>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>> to
>>>> the whole group?????
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>
>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>
> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>
>
>>
>>> Should have been an email!
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>
>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>
> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
> know......right?
>
>
Now now children!

On 27/3/07 16:40, in article
46093b54$0$8718$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net, "Paul J Lawless"
 wrote:

> 
> "Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>> 
>>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>> 
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>> 
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>> 
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>> 
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>> 
>> 
> Now now children!
> 
> 

You're assuming they're acting like children - you should commission
research at a respected university to prove your point before posting here
and making the whole group know your opinion, whether or not they want to.
Since when was Usenet for voicing opinion?  Is there somewhere quiet I can
lie down?

;-D

IMHO

Rolo

Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:40:48 +0100, "Paul J Lawless"
 wrote:

>
>"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>>
>>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>>
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>>
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>>
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>>
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>>
>>
>Now now children! 
>

Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P



^^^ Just send an e-mail, that'll fix it.

dezza

Exo wrote:
> Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
> there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
> assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
> assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P

Do you work for the civil service? ;-)

B&O Industry Ltd. is a high technology company which focus on the
design and manufacture of car DVD, MP3/MP4 and GPS.

Our products hot sell all over the world. Single din car dvd with
features  touch screen, detachable face panel and USB/SD/MMC/MP4/DVD/
CD/FM/AM /DIVX/TV FUNCTION and so on.

Also Our company have double din, flip-down, sunvisor and rear view.
You will always find interested products in our website.

Our website: www.oembo.com  or http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/szoembo

mails: sales@oembo.com   salesbo@gmail.com

Can you tell us what B&O stands for please ?

Your company logo strongly resembles that of the Bang & Olufsen
company.
Coincidence ??


Dezza.

"dezza"  wrote in message 
news:1174771763.843273.41470@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Can you tell us what B&O stands for please ?
>
> Your company logo strongly resembles that of the Bang & Olufsen
> company.
> Coincidence ??

You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it to 
the whole group????? Should have been an email!

"Axel VK"   wrote:


> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it to
> the whole group?????


^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.


Should have been an email!


^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????

Dezza.

"dezza"  wrote in message 
news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>
>
>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>> to
>> the whole group?????
>
>
> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.

Thats an assumption on your part.

> Should have been an email!
>
>
> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????

So other people know not to make the same mistake.

"Axel VK"  wrote in message 
news:46063bcb$0$7428$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "dezza"  wrote in message 
> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>
> Thats an assumption on your part.


And your assuming the opposite :-)


>
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>
> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, "Axel VK"  wrote:

>
>"dezza"  wrote in message 
>news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>
>Thats an assumption on your part.

Why, some of us might like to know.
I wouldn't send any emails to anyone in case of future spam.

>
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>
>So other people know not to make the same mistake. 
>

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:

> "dezza"  wrote in message 
> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
> 
> Thats an assumption on your part.

And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!


> 
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
> 
> So other people know not to make the same mistake.

So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
know......right?

"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>
>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>> to
>>>> the whole group?????
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>
>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>
> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>
>
>>
>>> Should have been an email!
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>
>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>
> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
> know......right?
>
>
Now now children!

On 27/3/07 16:40, in article
46093b54$0$8718$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net, "Paul J Lawless"
 wrote:

> 
> "Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>> 
>>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>> 
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>> 
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>> 
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>> 
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>> 
>> 
> Now now children!
> 
> 

You're assuming they're acting like children - you should commission
research at a respected university to prove your point before posting here
and making the whole group know your opinion, whether or not they want to.
Since when was Usenet for voicing opinion?  Is there somewhere quiet I can
lie down?

;-D

IMHO

Rolo

Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:40:48 +0100, "Paul J Lawless"
 wrote:

>
>"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>>
>>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>>
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>>
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>>
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>>
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>>
>>
>Now now children! 
>

Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P



^^^ Just send an e-mail, that'll fix it.

dezza

Exo wrote:
> Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
> there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
> assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
> assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P

Do you work for the civil service? ;-)

B&O Industry Ltd. is a high technology company which focus on the
design and manufacture of car DVD, MP3/MP4 and GPS.

Our products hot sell all over the world. Single din car dvd with
features  touch screen, detachable face panel and USB/SD/MMC/MP4/DVD/
CD/FM/AM /DIVX/TV FUNCTION and so on.

Also Our company have double din, flip-down, sunvisor and rear view.
You will always find interested products in our website.

Our website: www.oembo.com  or http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/szoembo

mails: sales@oembo.com   salesbo@gmail.com

Can you tell us what B&O stands for please ?

Your company logo strongly resembles that of the Bang & Olufsen
company.
Coincidence ??


Dezza.

"dezza"  wrote in message 
news:1174771763.843273.41470@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Can you tell us what B&O stands for please ?
>
> Your company logo strongly resembles that of the Bang & Olufsen
> company.
> Coincidence ??

You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it to 
the whole group????? Should have been an email!

"Axel VK"   wrote:


> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it to
> the whole group?????


^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.


Should have been an email!


^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????

Dezza.

"dezza"  wrote in message 
news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>
>
>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>> to
>> the whole group?????
>
>
> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.

Thats an assumption on your part.

> Should have been an email!
>
>
> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????

So other people know not to make the same mistake.

"Axel VK"  wrote in message 
news:46063bcb$0$7428$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "dezza"  wrote in message 
> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>
> Thats an assumption on your part.


And your assuming the opposite :-)


>
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>
> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, "Axel VK"  wrote:

>
>"dezza"  wrote in message 
>news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>
>Thats an assumption on your part.

Why, some of us might like to know.
I wouldn't send any emails to anyone in case of future spam.

>
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>
>So other people know not to make the same mistake. 
>

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:

> "dezza"  wrote in message 
> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
> 
> Thats an assumption on your part.

And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!


> 
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
> 
> So other people know not to make the same mistake.

So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
know......right?

"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>
>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>> to
>>>> the whole group?????
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>
>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>
> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>
>
>>
>>> Should have been an email!
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>
>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>
> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
> know......right?
>
>
Now now children!

On 27/3/07 16:40, in article
46093b54$0$8718$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net, "Paul J Lawless"
 wrote:

> 
> "Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>> 
>>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>> 
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>> 
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>> 
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>> 
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>> 
>> 
> Now now children!
> 
> 

You're assuming they're acting like children - you should commission
research at a respected university to prove your point before posting here
and making the whole group know your opinion, whether or not they want to.
Since when was Usenet for voicing opinion?  Is there somewhere quiet I can
lie down?

;-D

IMHO

Rolo

Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:40:48 +0100, "Paul J Lawless"
 wrote:

>
>"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>>
>>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>>
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>>
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>>
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>>
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>>
>>
>Now now children! 
>

Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P



^^^ Just send an e-mail, that'll fix it.

dezza

Exo wrote:
> Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
> there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
> assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
> assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P

Do you work for the civil service? ;-)

B&O Industry Ltd. is a high technology company which focus on the
design and manufacture of car DVD, MP3/MP4 and GPS.

Our products hot sell all over the world. Single din car dvd with
features  touch screen, detachable face panel and USB/SD/MMC/MP4/DVD/
CD/FM/AM /DIVX/TV FUNCTION and so on.

Also Our company have double din, flip-down, sunvisor and rear view.
You will always find interested products in our website.

Our website: www.oembo.com  or http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/szoembo

mails: sales@oembo.com   salesbo@gmail.com

Can you tell us what B&O stands for please ?

Your company logo strongly resembles that of the Bang & Olufsen
company.
Coincidence ??


Dezza.

"dezza"  wrote in message 
news:1174771763.843273.41470@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Can you tell us what B&O stands for please ?
>
> Your company logo strongly resembles that of the Bang & Olufsen
> company.
> Coincidence ??

You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it to 
the whole group????? Should have been an email!

"Axel VK"   wrote:


> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it to
> the whole group?????


^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.


Should have been an email!


^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????

Dezza.

"dezza"  wrote in message 
news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>
>
>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>> to
>> the whole group?????
>
>
> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.

Thats an assumption on your part.

> Should have been an email!
>
>
> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????

So other people know not to make the same mistake.

"Axel VK"  wrote in message 
news:46063bcb$0$7428$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "dezza"  wrote in message 
> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>
> Thats an assumption on your part.


And your assuming the opposite :-)


>
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>
> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, "Axel VK"  wrote:

>
>"dezza"  wrote in message 
>news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>
>Thats an assumption on your part.

Why, some of us might like to know.
I wouldn't send any emails to anyone in case of future spam.

>
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>
>So other people know not to make the same mistake. 
>

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:

> "dezza"  wrote in message 
> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it 
>>> to
>>> the whole group?????
>>
>>
>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
> 
> Thats an assumption on your part.

And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!


> 
>> Should have been an email!
>>
>>
>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
> 
> So other people know not to make the same mistake.

So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
know......right?

"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>
>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>> to
>>>> the whole group?????
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>
>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>
> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>
>
>>
>>> Should have been an email!
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>
>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>
> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
> know......right?
>
>
Now now children!

On 27/3/07 16:40, in article
46093b54$0$8718$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net, "Paul J Lawless"
 wrote:

> 
> "Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>> 
>>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>> 
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>> 
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>> 
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>> 
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>> 
>> 
> Now now children!
> 
> 

You're assuming they're acting like children - you should commission
research at a respected university to prove your point before posting here
and making the whole group know your opinion, whether or not they want to.
Since when was Usenet for voicing opinion?  Is there somewhere quiet I can
lie down?

;-D

IMHO

Rolo

Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:40:48 +0100, "Paul J Lawless"
 wrote:

>
>"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>>
>>> "dezza"  wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>  "Axel VK"   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>>
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>>
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^  Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>>
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>>
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>>
>>
>Now now children! 
>

Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P



^^^ Just send an e-mail, that'll fix it.

dezza

Exo wrote:
> Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
> there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
> assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
> assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused...  :P

Do you work for the civil service? ;-)