In message , Custard 
<ignore@the.facts-completely.invalid> writes
>On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:47:49 +0000, hugh  wrote:
>
>>In message , Custard
>><ignore@the.facts-completely.invalid> writes
>>>On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:37:51 +0000, hugh  wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>The overwhelming probability is that wearing a seat belt reduces the
>>>>level of injury.
>>>
>>>Quite probably, and where have I ever stated otherwise?.
>>>I personally don't like them and have never worn them since the day
>>>they became obligatory.
>>>
>>So maybe one day some paramedic/pc will be picking up your body parts on
>>the road and trying to make sure they all go in the same bag.
>
>And maybe they wont
>
>>>I think though that you'll find more people die every day from smoking
>>>related diseases so I'll await your attack upon them.
>
>>Would be quite happy to, but it would be seriously OT
>So what?
>
Hmm You decry anyone who offers a motorhome for sale on a motorhome 
newsgroup yet you want to enter into a general argument about smoking.

Shows what a prat you really are.
-- 
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting