On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:53:19 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:10:51 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:55:41 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:06:45 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:58:11 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:03:07 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:45:34 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:11:27 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:12:50 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:09:42 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:25:18 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:51:10 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:55:16 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>There's nothing "unfamiliar" about the word "sport".  I don't accept
>>>>>>>>>>>>>motor racing as sport and you cannot convince me that motor racing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>qualifies as sport.  
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>What's your definition of a sport?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The conventional one.  
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What's your definition of a sport? Please actually explain it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It would take more time than I can justify.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You seem to be backing down. Show some balls and offer your definition
>>>>>>>>of a sport and we'll see just why F1 doesn't fit into it and take a
>>>>>>>>look at what else doesn't fit into it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm really not that interested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You seem to be being rather timid. Why back down like this?
>>>>>
>>>>>I seem to be being rather disinterested.
>>>>
>>>>No, no. You're backing down timidly. Yet you're telling us that you
>>>>want to be more "assertive". Well let's have it then, assert your
>>>>definition of a sport on me.
>>>
>>>I've spent enough time on this nonsense already.
>>
>>Yet you keep replying. Either give it up or grow a pair and present
>>your definition of a sport. Otherwise everyone's going to know you
>>were talking out of your arse and laugh at you. And I know your
>>sensitive ego is going to have trouble "asserting" yourself against
>>that.
>
>I know what sport is.  I don't need to convince you or any other
>speed-obsessed knobhead.  

Then all that remains is that you've made a bit of a tit of yourself.

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:31:44 +0100, Ed Chilada 
wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:53:19 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:10:51 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:55:41 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:06:45 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:58:11 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:03:07 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:45:34 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:11:27 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:12:50 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:09:42 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:25:18 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:51:10 +0100, Ed Chilada 
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:55:16 GMT, graz@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There's nothing "unfamiliar" about the word "sport".  I don't accept
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>motor racing as sport and you cannot convince me that motor racing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>qualifies as sport.  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>What's your definition of a sport?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The conventional one.  
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>What's your definition of a sport? Please actually explain it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It would take more time than I can justify.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You seem to be backing down. Show some balls and offer your definition
>>>>>>>>>of a sport and we'll see just why F1 doesn't fit into it and take a
>>>>>>>>>look at what else doesn't fit into it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I'm really not that interested.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You seem to be being rather timid. Why back down like this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I seem to be being rather disinterested.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, no. You're backing down timidly. Yet you're telling us that you
>>>>>want to be more "assertive". Well let's have it then, assert your
>>>>>definition of a sport on me.
>>>>
>>>>I've spent enough time on this nonsense already.
>>>
>>>Yet you keep replying. Either give it up or grow a pair and present
>>>your definition of a sport. Otherwise everyone's going to know you
>>>were talking out of your arse and laugh at you. And I know your
>>>sensitive ego is going to have trouble "asserting" yourself against
>>>that.
>>
>>I know what sport is.  I don't need to convince you or any other
>>speed-obsessed knobhead.  
>
>Then all that remains is that you've made a bit of a tit of yourself.

And your opinion is supposed to mean something?