Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
rec-sporting
camping
caravanning
caving
climbing
cycling
dancing
driving
fishing.coarse
fishing.game
fishing.sea
motorcaravans
motorcycles
motorcycles.classic
motorcycles.trailriding
motorsport.misc
motorsport.oval-racing
sailing
scouting
shooting.clays
shooting.game
shooting.target
walking
  
 
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:51:27 -0800 (PST),    group: uk.rec.cycling        back       
Re: Pavement Cyclists - Daily Telegraph   
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:51:26 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
 wrote:

>On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:35:41 GMT, "bartc"  wrote:
>
>>Parking on the pavement is often done to keep the highway clear for traffic. 
>>Usually drivers are sensible enough to keep enough of the pavement clear for 
>>pedestrians. Banning this nationwide would cause chaos. I wouldn't be able 
>>to get out of my road for a start since my car doesn't fit through a 3' gap.
>
>Makes you wonder why they have had to run public information films
>telling drivers not to block pavements, doesn't it?  
>
><http://hub.tv-ark.org.uk/dsplus/m.php?p=pavementparking1981.rm>
> 
>Guy


You are a fuckwit Chapman:

General Error: 001


Or was it me having difficulty wrapping the url.

What a tosser.


--    
As a pedestrian, you're more likely to be hit and injured by a moped than by a cyclist. (Guy Chapman)
Absolute rubbish - please produce evidence  (Judith Smith)
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:54:14 +0000   author:   Judith M Smith

Re: Not Doug   
On 3 Nov, 16:20, Derek Geldard  wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:19:50 -0800 (PST), Doug 
> wrote:
>
> >On 2 Nov, 09:51, Derek Geldard  wrote:
> >> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:23:48 -0800 (PST), Doug 
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> > How can they stand on their rights when their rights have been
> >> >> > removed?
>
> >> >> That's your view. Think then of what your responsibilities are then if
> >> >> you think you have no rights.
>
> >> >Responsibilities are supposed to go with rights.
>
> >> You can have responsibilities (obligations, rather) without rights.
>
> >Example?
>
> You really aren't thinking at all.
>
> We all have responsibilities to what we can to protect our
> communities, keep a look out for burglars, confidence tricksters and
> peadophiles. look after our disabled neighbours, not to repair
> bicycles on the pavement, protect public open spaces such as
> cemeteries, show respect for the dead, minimise the use of energy by
> eating locally grown food. That sort of thing.
>
If you take a closer look at those responsibilities you will see they
are all accompanied by rights. Social responsibility is supposed to
benefit all but when you remove rights from some to benefit others the
system breaks down.

--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
One man's democracy is another man's regime.
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:51:27 -0800 (PST)   author:   Doug

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us