On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:15:36 +0100, Guy - you are still feeding them
 said in
<gc2agp$tp2$1@registered.motzarella.org>:

>Surely you think that they are one and the same - as you have said.

No, I commented humorously that judith threatened the end of
civilisation and nuxxy then tried to make it happen; it's far more
likely that judith contacted nuxxy outside of this group and came to
some arrangement, but frankly I don't care.  It's just another data
point, judith is a nasty spiteful shrewish troll and nuxxy is a
hate-filled deranged troll, they are both trolls who have entirely
worn out their welcome here.

>Is it true that she had a bet with someone that she couldn't keep you 
>personally continuing your rants until there was a certain number and 
>then she won fifty notes?

Me personally? I don't think so, I think it was a different argument
with someone else in a different group - Ian found it so ask him.

>When did you post the lies about her which she seems to be obsessed 
>with? Was it part of the trolling exercise - or was it you getting revenge?

According to judith it is a "lie" to say that she made snide
insinuations about John Franklin; as it happens everyone else who's
ventured an opinion thinks she /did/, and the links to the posts
were given when she demanded to know where she had done that;
judith's response was (and is) fingers in ears, "laa laa, I'm not
listening - now where's the evidence?" - on Wikipedia we have a
handy shortcut to describe that behaviour:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT>

This sensitivity to lies has not, of course, stopped her from
claiming that I "deceitfully" amended a web page, when the internet
archive clearly shows no change whatsoever to the content of that
page since 2004.  Because, of course, judith doesn't "lie" - she is
occasionally "mistaken", like when she went around attributing
quoted text to BHRF, here and elsewhere, and it turned out that
she'd made it up, but she doesn't "lie" like the non-trolls in this
group "lie".  We're all a bunch of shocking liars, you know - we
"lie" about cycling not being dangerous, we "lie" about helmet laws
not working - all kinds of things.  Of course, this is the troll
definition of "lie", which equates to having an opinion different
from that of the troll and being able to support it.

There's no point trying to treat judith's assertions as if they were
rational or amenable to reason.

Guy
-- 
May contain traces of irony.  Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

"Brendan Halpin"  wrote in message 
news:87abdnnmpu.fsf@wivenhoe.staff8.ul.ie...
> Guy,
>
> Stop talking about the shits, and to the shits, and start talking about
> bikes. Percolate oxygen through the sewage and save u.r.c.

Seconded.

Hmm, should I go and fit the shiny new brooks saddle? The plan is to move 
the comfy one on my commuter onto the tandem and put the new one on my 
commuter, so it actually gets broken in. Need to pluck up the nerve though 
:-)

(also need to find the proofide...)

cheers,
clive

Clive George wrote:

> Hmm, should I go and fit the shiny new brooks saddle? The plan is to move 
> the comfy one on my commuter onto the tandem and put the new one on my 
> commuter, so it actually gets broken in. Need to pluck up the nerve though 

Think of it as "the comfy one" and "then even comfier one"... I've
ridden all of my Brooksen straight out of the box with no pain (well,
almost... 35 miles including MTBing on the Brom without the aid of
padded shorts was a bit of a stern day!).

Pete.
-- 
Peter Clinch                    Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637   Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177              Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk     http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/