probably more fun than trainspotting

ulapamilaalver@gmail.com wrote:
> Super real virtual girl. Sexy. Must look ALL http://ragdai.info/video.htm
>

ziggy  writes:

> probably more fun than trainspotting
> 
> ulapamilaalver@gmail.com wrote:
> > Super real virtual girl. Sexy. Must look ALL http://ragdai.info/video.htm
> >

After your last four posts, I just thought I out to raise a couple of
points.
The fisrt is a nettiquette one: please bottom post, top posting is
somewhat annoying (since it messes up the flow of conversation in a
bottom-posting group, and, when posting short posts, means that people
are likely to scroll to the bottom, realise that you ahve top posted,
and have to scroll back up, which although it is not much work, is
mildly irritating). Also:

>Because it messes up the flow of converstation. 
>>Why?
>>> Top posting
>>>>what is the worst thing on Usenet?

The second is that you seem to be sending both a To: header and 
a Newsgroup: header. This could mean that your newsreader is confused
or broken, and is sending whoever you are responding to an email as
well as posting a news message, or it could just be sending irrelevant
headers, in which case, an RFC-compliant newsreader shouldn't have any
problems recieving it, and you shouldn't worry too much.

Philip wrote, On 29/09/2008 18:20:
> After your last four posts, I just thought I out to raise a couple of
> points.


Excellent but you also missed the bit about not reposting spam and 
definitely not reposting the actual spam url.

LN