Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
rec-sporting
camping
caravanning
caving
climbing
cycling
dancing
driving
fishing.coarse
fishing.game
fishing.sea
motorcaravans
motorcycles
motorcycles.classic
motorcycles.trailriding
motorsport.misc
motorsport.oval-racing
sailing
scouting
shooting.clays
shooting.game
shooting.target
walking
  
 
date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:42:31 +0100,    group: uk.rec.cycling        back       
Re: "But I was indicating!"   
JNugent  considered Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:48:49 +0100 the
perfect time to write:

>Daniel Barlow wrote:
>
>> JNugent  writes:
>
>>> Correct.
>>> *Not normal*.
>
>> You say that like it's automatically a bad thing.
>
>> Do you read the Sun?  Play the Lottery?
>
>Neither thing (as I suspect you well know).
>
>It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, abnormal (outside the 
>established norms of behaviour) to read a proper newspaper or no paper 
>at all - rather than The Sun or The Daily Mirror. Neither is it anything 
>other than completely normal to refrain from wasting money on a lottery 
>with hopeless odds which relies on hype rather than a reasonable 
>expectation of return.
>
>But going round recording the daily business of others in public places 
>on videotape with a view to picking fights is *very* abnormal.

So much so that just about every high street shop does it, and the
only thing they risk losing is money.

Ensuring you have evidence for the occasions when idiots threaten your
life is far from picking fights - it's avoiding them.
People need reminding that they could be confronted with the evidence
of their negligence.
date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:42:31 +0100   author:   Phil W Lee phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk

Re: "But I was indicating!"   
Phil W Lee wrote:

> JNugent :
>> Daniel Barlow wrote:
>>> JNugent  writes:

>>>> Correct.
>>>> *Not normal*.

>>> You say that like it's automatically a bad thing.

>>> Do you read the Sun?  Play the Lottery?

>> Neither thing (as I suspect you well know).
>> It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, abnormal (outside the 
>> established norms of behaviour) to read a proper newspaper or no paper 
>> at all - rather than The Sun or The Daily Mirror. Neither is it anything 
>> other than completely normal to refrain from wasting money on a lottery 
>> with hopeless odds which relies on hype rather than a reasonable 
>> expectation of return.
>> But going round recording the daily business of others in public places 
>> on videotape with a view to picking fights is *very* abnormal.

> So much so that just about every high street shop does it, and the
> only thing they risk losing is money.

No, high street shops don't "go around".

Try again. We are talking of individuals.

> Ensuring you have evidence for the occasions when idiots threaten your
> life is far from picking fights - it's avoiding them.
> People need reminding that they could be confronted with the evidence
> of their negligence.

Ah... so it's you!
date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:01:51 +0100   author:   JNugent

Re: "But I was indicating!"   
JNugent wrote:
> Phil W Lee wrote:
> 
>> JNugent :
>>> Daniel Barlow wrote:
>>>> JNugent  writes:
> 
>>>>> Correct.
>>>>> *Not normal*.
> 
>>>> You say that like it's automatically a bad thing.
> 
>>>> Do you read the Sun?  Play the Lottery?
> 
>>> Neither thing (as I suspect you well know).
>>> It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, abnormal (outside the 
>>> established norms of behaviour) to read a proper newspaper or no 
>>> paper at all - rather than The Sun or The Daily Mirror. Neither is it 
>>> anything other than completely normal to refrain from wasting money 
>>> on a lottery with hopeless odds which relies on hype rather than a 
>>> reasonable expectation of return.
>>> But going round recording the daily business of others in public 
>>> places on videotape with a view to picking fights is *very* abnormal.
> 
>> So much so that just about every high street shop does it, and the
>> only thing they risk losing is money.
> 
> No, high street shops don't "go around".
> 
> Try again. We are talking of individuals.
> 
>> Ensuring you have evidence for the occasions when idiots threaten your
>> life is far from picking fights - it's avoiding them.
>> People need reminding that they could be confronted with the evidence
>> of their negligence.
> 
> Ah... so it's you!

Sound for all the world like a banned driver upset that others can drive 
and he cant, dont he? LOL
date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:16:30 +0100   author:   still a novice

Re: "But I was indicating!"   
aquachimp wrote:
> On Aug 23, 1:42 pm, Squashme  wrote:
>> On 23 Aug, 12:05, aquachimp 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 23, 4:42 am, Phil W Lee <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>> JNugent  considered Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:48:49 +0100 the
>>>> perfect time to write:
>>>>> Daniel Barlow wrote:
>>>>>> JNugent  writes:
>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>> *Not normal*.
>>>>>> You say that like it's automatically a bad thing.
>>>>>> Do you read the Sun?  Play the Lottery?
>>>>> Neither thing (as I suspect you well know).
>>>>> It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, abnormal (outside the
>>>>> established norms of behaviour) to read a proper newspaper or no paper
>>>>> at all - rather than The Sun or The Daily Mirror. Neither is it anything
>>>>> other than completely normal to refrain from wasting money on a lottery
>>>>> with hopeless odds which relies on hype rather than a reasonable
>>>>> expectation of return.
>>>>> But going round recording the daily business of others in public places
>>>>> on videotape with a view to picking fights is *very* abnormal.
>>>> So much so that just about every high street shop does it, and the
>>>> only thing they risk losing is money.
>>>> Ensuring you have evidence for the occasions when idiots threaten your
>>>> life is far from picking fights - it's avoiding them.
>>>> People need reminding that they could be confronted with the evidence
>>>> of their negligence.
>>> Apart from which, the skills of motorist in question were such that in
>>> order to leave the roadway she needed to slow down to a speed that was
>>> even slower, by quite a margin, to that of the cyclist she had just
>>> overtaken.
>>> Dumb or what!
>> I've just been overtaken and immediately turned left across this
>> morning (23rd). It's just laughable. Killing joke, sometimes, of
>> course. And, probably,  once dead, I could be accused of having been
>> overtaking on the inside.
>>
>> Dead to save some ass a second.
> 
> Maybe you'd like to run that lot past me again. I can't make head nor
> tail out of it. Sorry.

Dont worry, he often speaks complete gibberish...
date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:17:41 +0100   author:   still a novice

Re: "But I was indicating!"   
If there's one thing worse than a trolling fuckwit it's a
nym-shifting trolling fuckwit.

* plonk *

Guy
-- 
May contain traces of irony.  Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:10:31 +0100   author:   Just zis Guy, you know?

Re: "But I was indicating!"   
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:10:31 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
 wrote:

>If there's one thing worse than a trolling fuckwit it's a
>nym-shifting trolling fuckwit.
>
>* plonk *
>
>Guy


Hello - Guy - I trust you're not suggesting this is anything to do
with me?

--   

if you're going to make snide insinuations about the author,
as you undoubtedly did, then you can fuck right off. (Guy Chapman)
date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:21:25 +0100   author:   judith

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us