BrianW  gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>> >> >> If you posted into an unused group, and nobody read it, would you
>> >> >> still be utterly wrong?

>> >> > Interesting question.  Quantum physics would dictate that in such
>> >> > circumstances, the post would be a superposition of "utterly
>> >> > right" and "utterly wrong", and would only disentangle when
>> >> > someone actually read it.
>> >> > In this instance, however, quantum physics is wrong - Mr Bollen's
>> >> > posts are inherently "100% wrong, 100% of the time".  There is
>> >> > therefore no duality in his posts at all.

>> >> "Schroduhggle's crap"

>> > It's a good job it isn't "Schroduhggle's cat", as the latter would be
>> > a "slave animal".

>> Or would it? We won't know, unless we open the box.

> I think keeping a cat in a closed box is very cruel indeed. If anyone
> tries it, they'd better post armed guards outside their grannies'
> graves.

Would keeping Duhg in a closed box be acceptable?