|
|
|
date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:29:34 GMT,
group: uk.rec.caravanning
back
Radio Aerials
My Lunar Stellar caravan came equipped with a radio aerial which
looks like this
http://www.towsure.com/product/2145-Caravan_FM_Leisure_Radio_Aerial
And I have fitted an old car radio/CD player in the housing
provided. (Worked very well in my car)
I have no idea if the aerial actually includes an amplifier, or
if so, where it takes its feed from, (or indeed if it is
functioning) but its performance is not great.
What experience have others had?
The van is also fitted with the usual Status omni-directional TV
aerial, which appears to have an FM output. I could, with a bit
of woodwork, run a cable from here to the radio. Is this
something anybody else has tried - was it successful?
Testing on my drive will probably not tell me much, as I have
quite a good signal at home, and research projects might not be
popular on vacation ;-).
Chris
--
Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK
chris@cdixon.me.uk
Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh.
date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:29:34 GMT
author: Chris J Dixon
|
Re: Radio Aerials
Chris J Dixon was thinking very hard :
> My Lunar Stellar caravan came equipped with a radio aerial which
> looks like this
> http://www.towsure.com/product/2145-Caravan_FM_Leisure_Radio_Aerial
>
> And I have fitted an old car radio/CD player in the housing
> provided. (Worked very well in my car)
>
> I have no idea if the aerial actually includes an amplifier, or
> if so, where it takes its feed from, (or indeed if it is
> functioning) but its performance is not great.
According to the URL you provided, it does include a booster. The thin
red wire provides the +ve supply and the -ve is probably via the
antenna cables outer screen or a fixing screw.
As the unit will draw some current all the time, I would expect there
to be a switch somewhere to turn it off when not in use.
> What experience have others had?
>
> The van is also fitted with the usual Status omni-directional TV
> aerial, which appears to have an FM output. I could, with a bit
> of woodwork, run a cable from here to the radio. Is this
> something anybody else has tried - was it successful?
Status antennas are a bit of a compromise anyway, but might be fine for
local radio reception. We have one, but it is generally of little use
where we tend to go. We now only bother with a satellite system which
provides perfect reception and includes radio anyway.
>
> Testing on my drive will probably not tell me much, as I have
> quite a good signal at home, and research projects might not be
> popular on vacation ;-).
--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:45:47 +0100
author: Harry Bloomfield
|
Re: Radio Aerials
"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message
news:mn.ec297d85589db829.86812@NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk...
> Chris J Dixon was thinking very hard :
>> My Lunar Stellar caravan came equipped with a radio aerial which
>> looks like this
>> http://www.towsure.com/product/2145-Caravan_FM_Leisure_Radio_Aerial
>>
>> And I have fitted an old car radio/CD player in the housing
>> provided. (Worked very well in my car)
>>
>> I have no idea if the aerial actually includes an amplifier, or
>> if so, where it takes its feed from, (or indeed if it is
>> functioning) but its performance is not great.
>
> According to the URL you provided, it does include a booster. The thin red
> wire provides the +ve supply and the -ve is probably via the antenna
> cables outer screen or a fixing screw.
>
> As the unit will draw some current all the time, I would expect there to
> be a switch somewhere to turn it off when not in use.
>
>> What experience have others had?
>>
>> The van is also fitted with the usual Status omni-directional TV
>> aerial, which appears to have an FM output. I could, with a bit
>> of woodwork, run a cable from here to the radio. Is this
>> something anybody else has tried - was it successful?
>
> Status antennas are a bit of a compromise anyway, but might be fine for
> local radio reception. We have one, but it is generally of little use
> where we tend to go. We now only bother with a satellite system which
> provides perfect reception and includes radio anyway.
>
>>
>> Testing on my drive will probably not tell me much, as I have
>> quite a good signal at home, and research projects might not be
>> popular on vacation ;-).
>
> --
> Regards,
> Harry (M1BYT) (L)
> http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
>
I have one of these and as the previous reply states it does include an
amplifier. Many radio sets like mine have a feed for an automatic antenna
and that is the best place to plug the red lead into, itis therefore only on
when the radio is on.
Mine is actually inside the locker behind the radio ( not on the outside of
the van) and gives me good FM reception, I cannot recall ever being on a
site in the UK where it did not give me an adequate signal.
Barry
date: Fri, 30 May 2008 09:08:48 +0100
author: Barry
|
Re: Radio Aerials
Barry wrote:
>I have one of these and as the previous reply states it does include an
>amplifier. Many radio sets like mine have a feed for an automatic antenna
>and that is the best place to plug the red lead into, itis therefore only on
>when the radio is on.
>Mine is actually inside the locker behind the radio ( not on the outside of
>the van) and gives me good FM reception, I cannot recall ever being on a
>site in the UK where it did not give me an adequate signal.
Dawn of realisation :-)
So that's why there was a separate cable simply identified as DC+
in the radio housing area. Looks like I better connect it up and
see if it works with some power on it.
Chris
--
Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK
chris@cdixon.me.uk
Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh.
date: Fri, 30 May 2008 09:56:05 GMT
author: Chris J Dixon
|
Re: Radio Aerials
Chris J Dixon wrote:
>Dawn of realisation :-)
>
>So that's why there was a separate cable simply identified as DC+
>in the radio housing area. Looks like I better connect it up and
>see if it works with some power on it.
>
To follow myself up, I made the power connection, but there
wasn't much change. However, though illogical, I discovered
accidentally that I got a much better signal with the aerial
connector only plugged part way into the radio. Time will tell.
Chris
--
Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK
chris@cdixon.me.uk
Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh.
date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:17:14 GMT
author: Chris J Dixon
|
Re: Radio Aerials
On 30 May, 13:17, Chris J Dixon wrote:
> Chris J Dixon wrote:
> >Dawn of realisation :-)
>
> >So that's why there was a separate cable simply identified as DC+
> >in the radio housing area. Looks like I better connect it up and
> >see if it works with some power on it.
>
> To follow myself up, I made the power connection, but there
> wasn't much change. However, though illogical, I discovered
> accidentally that I got a much better signal with the aerial
> connector only plugged part way into the radio. Time will tell.
>
> Chris
> --
> Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK
> ch...@cdixon.me.uk
>
> Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh.
That certainly does suggest that there is no power going to the
booster and the radio is picking up the signal on the cable only.
date: Fri, 30 May 2008 09:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
author: g6zru
|
Re: Radio Aerials
Chris J Dixon formulated the question :
> Chris J Dixon wrote:
>
>> Dawn of realisation :-)
>>
>> So that's why there was a separate cable simply identified as DC+
>> in the radio housing area. Looks like I better connect it up and
>> see if it works with some power on it.
>>
> To follow myself up, I made the power connection, but there
> wasn't much change. However, though illogical, I discovered
> accidentally that I got a much better signal with the aerial
> connector only plugged part way into the radio. Time will tell.
>
> Chris
Which might seem to indicate that it is faulty and/or the screen and/or
ground connection for the antenna is lacking.
--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
date: Fri, 30 May 2008 19:22:18 +0100
author: Harry Bloomfield
|
Re: Radio Aerials
g6zru wrote:
>On 30 May, 13:17, Chris J Dixon wrote:
>> To follow myself up, I made the power connection, but there
>> wasn't much change. However, though illogical, I discovered
>> accidentally that I got a much better signal with the aerial
>> connector only plugged part way into the radio. Time will tell.
>That certainly does suggest that there is no power going to the
>booster and the radio is picking up the signal on the cable only.
and Harry Bloomfield wrote:
>Which might seem to indicate that it is faulty and/or the screen and/or
>ground connection for the antenna is lacking.
Yes, that does seem to be the logical conclusion. I have
measured, and can confirm that the wire for the booster power
supply is now being energised, at the supply end.
As far as I can see, the screen makes contact with the radio
socket first, and the signal is good. When pressed further in,
as the centre pin makes contact, the signal degrades. I suppose
I could take a few measurements with my DMM. Does anybody know
what resistance I should expect on a healthy unit between any
pair of pin, screen and power lead?
I guess the return path for the amplifier current is via the
screen?
Any other suggested tests?
Chris
--
Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK
chris@cdixon.me.uk
Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh.
date: Sat, 31 May 2008 07:35:11 GMT
author: Chris J Dixon
|
|
|