On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:45:41 -0000, "national treasure"
 wrote:

>The duplicity deepens.
>
>'Consent'?, from whom?  
From the person who originally posted the reply to the FAQ to this
newsgroup. (Hint: Use Google Groups to look them up)
>Your website (if one must dignify that amateurish 
>cobble of HTML by such a description) purports to be the combined wisdom of 
>a tedious trio of sages (one of whom is yourself) who's finger wagging 
>statements of the bleedin' obvious make death by lying on a train track a 
>surprisingly attractive alternative to reading their drivel.
Then don't. (By the way. The site was designed to be fast and minimal to
download, so the _real_ caravanners could, if they need to, access the
pages using GPRS).
>Yet you also state that the information has been garnered from this 
>newsgroup - thus, one might be forgiven for assuming that the only 
>contributors here are the unholy trio who so proudly (|and so inexplicably) 
>claim the credit.
>The other possibility is that you and your accomplices have rephrased the 
>accumulated wisdom here, and regurgitated as your own work.
>In that case your claim to have  'consent' is as bogus as the coma-inducing 
>'FAQ' itself.
I think from your comments here and in your previous newsgroups postings
(See
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=F5ozKhQAAABMf35cYeY0Uo1kcQBh7sycOPANdqfI6prRsqjc7uCt1A)
that you can FOAD.

You're a troll and I claim my £5

Good luck in the future (when you leave school that is). I hope you manage
to get a job in McDonalds.

Richard
Web pages: http://www.caravanningnow.co.uk/ for caravanning,
http://www.rcole.org/ for my personal web site and
http://www.homeindorset.co.uk because I love the email address.
-- 
He was not going to be found wanting when duty called. He did not intend to be
found at all.  - The Last Continent by Terry Pratchett

"Richard Cole" <ispcrco@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote in message 
news:s89ek3dil3j371lbre8i61ik7l4fjpqs84@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:45:41 -0000, "national treasure"
>  wrote:
>
>>The duplicity deepens.
>>
>>'Consent'?, from whom?
> From the person who originally posted the reply to the FAQ to this
> newsgroup. (Hint: Use Google Groups to look them up)
>>Your website (if one must dignify that amateurish
>>cobble of HTML by such a description) purports to be the combined wisdom 
>>of
>>a tedious trio of sages (one of whom is yourself) who's finger wagging
>>statements of the bleedin' obvious make death by lying on a train track a
>>surprisingly attractive alternative to reading their drivel.
> Then don't. (By the way. The site was designed to be fast and minimal to
> download, so the _real_ caravanners could, if they need to, access the
> pages using GPRS).
>>Yet you also state that the information has been garnered from this
>>newsgroup - thus, one might be forgiven for assuming that the only
>>contributors here are the unholy trio who so proudly (|and so 
>>inexplicably)
>>claim the credit.
>>The other possibility is that you and your accomplices have rephrased the
>>accumulated wisdom here, and regurgitated as your own work.
>>In that case your claim to have  'consent' is as bogus as the 
>>coma-inducing
>>'FAQ' itself.
> I think from your comments here and in your previous newsgroups postings
> (See
> http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=F5ozKhQAAABMf35cYeY0Uo1kcQBh7sycOPANdqfI6prRsqjc7uCt1A)
> that you can FOAD.
>
> You're a troll and I claim my £5
>
> Good luck in the future (when you leave school that is). I hope you manage
> to get a job in McDonalds.


'Fuck Off And Die'?!! - my goodness, Dick, you must be getting unhealthily 
agitated to use language like that.  After all, you're not speaking to Mrs 
Cole now, you know.

Let's not, however, allow your foul mouthed bluster to divert us from the 
matter in hand.

Your vague references to the newsgroup FAQ, and the compiler thereof, do 
nothing to dispel the growing suspicion (which \I'm sure our readers now 
share) that you are a fraud - that you have taken the work of others and 
placed it on your rag-bag 'website' (I enjoyed your amusing comment about 
being amateurish in order to improve the access speed btw - if you knew the 
first thing about such matters, you would know how to produce  a 
professional looking site that still has  low bandwidth consumption)

\in short, while the postings here are (as they should be) freely available 
for public scrutiny, that does not mean that you are free to steal them and 
pass them off as the work of Messrs. White, Clayton & Cole - with  'others' 
being something of an afterthought, despite the bulk of the contributions 
coming from 'others'.

"Please remember that this site was constructed from your comments" - is 
that not your own statement?  That necessarily includes my (many) 
contributions to ukrc, made under various pseudonyms over several years - 
and it has not escaped my notice that you haven't obtained *my* permission 
to reproduce my advice on your website.

I may be a Troll (actually, a very superior type of Troll)  - but you are a 
thief and a plagiarist - and infinitely more to be condemned than I.