http://www.claim4refunds.com/

Have you ever used this company or heard any feedback on this ?
I have had a chat with an advisor from this company and she said it's
100% safe. It looks too good to be true

Thanks




-- 
Dean Farmer

On 17 Aug, 20:02, Dean Farmer <Dean.Farmer.
4cf6...@financebanter.co.uk> wrote:
> http://www.claim4refunds.com/
>
> Have you ever used this company or heard any feedback on this ?
> I have had a chat with an advisor from this company and she said it's
> 100% safe. It looks too good to be true
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Dean Farmer

IMO it is too good to be true, and is therefore a scam.

The Ministry of Justice has warned firms working in this area about
misleading advertising - see:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/newsrelease170209a.htm

The Solicitors Regulation Authority is also concerned - see:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8010321.stm

If you're struggling with debt, the Financial Services Authority gives
advice as to how to deal with your debt, and how to get further help:
http://www.moneymadeclear.fsa.gov.uk/guides/help/dealing_with_debt.html

My personal view of this kind of thing is that the claimant is trying to use 
some device to get out of an obligation (to repay a debt). If that 
obligation was incurred because of mis-selling or some devious practice, 
then all well and good, try to get out of it. But if someone racks up a 
credit card debt because they set out to do that, then try to get out of it 
because of some poor wording on the part of the CC company, they should be 
shot. Reclaims paid out by financial institutions - morally valid or not - 
simply mean that they will try to recoup these costs from the rest of the 
customers.

Rob Graham

I should have added . . this is part of the 'let's try and pin it on someone 
else' culture. Makes me sick.

Rob Graham

Dean Farmer  gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying:

> I have had a chat with a

salesmuppet

> from this company and she said it's 100% safe.

<shocked> They... DIDN'T... Did they? Blimey.

Salesmuppet for firm in non-reputable market claims company "100% safe". 
Hold the front page.

"robgraham"  wrote in message 
news:GeudndYk-M4G8hfXnZ2dnUVZ8gCdnZ2d@bt.com...
> My personal view of this kind of thing is that the claimant is trying to 
> use some device to get out of an obligation (to repay a debt). If that 
> obligation was incurred because of mis-selling or some devious practice, 
> then all well and good, try to get out of it. But if someone racks up a 
> credit card debt because they set out to do that, then try to get out of 
> it because of some poor wording on the part of the CC company, they should 
> be shot. Reclaims paid out by financial institutions - morally valid or 
> not - simply mean that they will try to recoup these costs from the rest 
> of the customers.
>

Except the institution made an assessed risk in order to maximise profit, 
with the belief that the debtor may well become bankrupt and so charged 
interest accordingly.  It's a purely commercial decision to lend the money, 
so there is no reason why the individual shouldn't take the same pragmatic 
approach.  Money and business both circumnavigate morals!

Other customers were always going to pay!

"Dean Farmer"  wrote in message 
news:Dean.Farmer.4cf6426@financebanter.co.uk...
>
> http://www.claim4refunds.com/
>
> Have you ever used this company or heard any feedback on this ?
> I have had a chat with an advisor from this company and she said it's
> 100% safe. It looks too good to be true
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dean Farmer

Mr Wootton from Harlow seems happy, so it MUST work.

Hi, I thought all of this was too good to be true to be quite honest. I used Cartel Client Review and they charged me £500 and have done nothing for me for over 11 months! This is a lot of money to me

One of my friends did have some of their debts cancelled though, through a different company so it can work.

url:http://myreader.co.uk/msg/129629949.aspx