In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:44:50 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article , Pat Gardiner
>> writes
>>>
>>>I've amended the header to correct the spelling of my name and to
>>>reflect the fact that the opinion is that of a man who seems to be too
>>>ashamed of his university to admit he got his doctorate there.
>>>
>>You fatuous oaf. The university which awarded my doctorate is mentioned
>>on my website. And, just for clarity, that's the website you have just
>>claimed I don't have, presumably because you're not bright enough to
>>find it for yourself or because you prefer to make wild and
>>unsubstantiated assumptions about people who criticise you rather than
>>finding out the truth.
>>
>>>Perhaps the sentiment is reciprocated I ask myself?
>>>
>>Another particularly stupid remark. When you are obviously losing an
>>argument, all you can do is to resort to childish name-calling and
>>pathetic little attempted insults.
>>
>>All readers of this ng will doubtless take note of this behaviour of
>>yours.
>
>I'm sure that the investigators into the origins of Britain;s constant
>animal and human health crises will carefully follow this thread and
>wonder why such an eminent academic should spend so many years
>stalking, harassing and constantly misrepresenting someone complaining
>about state veterinary corruption.
>
I haven't seen anyone on this ng fitting that description. Nor is there 
any evidence on this ng of anyone doing those things. What there is 
evidence of is someone who cannot accept the slightest criticism of his 
several posts a day without falsely accusing them of stalking, 
harassment and misrepresentation. Can it be that this demonstrates that 
he realises that he cannot defend his many hypotheses, not to mention 
his many libels against both British vets and posters here?

>I'm certainly curious.
>
Very true. You are.

>Perhaps you would like to mention the University here and the URL of
>your website?
>
Why not do your own research? It really isn't that difficult for someone 
familiar with search engines, particularly not after the help I've given 
you.

>I've noticed others asking you for the same information many times in
>the past were always met with a hail of abuse.
>
No, you haven't noticed any such thing. That's just another lie. If 
people have asked in the past, I have told them to find the information 
for themselves. It's a little game I play for my own amusement and it 
also serves to see whether they are serious in their wish to know. Some 
have willing risen to the challenge and indeed have posted the 
information on more than one newsgroup. Others, including one whose 
libels against me you have foolishly copied, have accused me of falsely 
claiming to have a PhD. He has not received any abuse from me because, 
again showing up a lying claim you made recently about me, I don't ever 
respond to his posts.

>I will make sure the information is carefully preserved safe from
>removal.
>
Bwahahahahahaha :-)))))

You very, very, silly man. The information is "carefully preserved safe 
from removal" on the university in question's website (if you had the 
wit to find it), not to mention in the published list of post-graduate 
awards for that year, plus there is a copy of my thesis on their library 
shelves. Are you *really* that ignorant or just carried away with a 
ridiculous sense of your own importance?

-- 
Malcolm