In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>
>I've amended the header to correct the spelling of my name and to
>reflect the fact that the opinion is that of a man who seems to be too
>ashamed of his university to admit he got his doctorate there.
>
You fatuous oaf. The university which awarded my doctorate is mentioned 
on my website. And, just for clarity, that's the website you have just 
claimed I don't have, presumably because you're not bright enough to 
find it for yourself or because you prefer to make wild and 
unsubstantiated assumptions about people who criticise you rather than 
finding out the truth.

>Perhaps the sentiment is reciprocated I ask myself?
>
Another particularly stupid remark. When you are obviously losing an 
argument, all you can do is to resort to childish name-calling and 
pathetic little attempted insults.

All readers of this ng will doubtless take note of this behaviour of 
yours.

-- 
Malcolm

On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:40:25 +0100, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , Pat Gardiner 
> writes
>>
>>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:14:47 +0100, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>And my advice is to sort yourself out.
>>
>>I'm onto you Doctor Ogilvie.
>>
>ROFL!!!
>
>>You have a real doctorate
>
>Well done. You've got there at last. And about time, too. As a matter of 
>interest, how many mouse clicks did it take you? The record is 6 :-))
>
>So now you can put at rest all those doubts you expressed about it, led 
>by the nose, as you were, by your friend "Pete". He is the only person 
>to try to claim that I didn't have a PhD. You took your lead from him 
>More fool you when the evidence was so readily available.
>
>> and for some reason try, by your bizarre
>>behavior, stalking and harassment
>
>I have stalked no-one and harassed no-one. To claim otherwise is to 
>libel me :-)
>
>>to giad the unwary into openly
>>accusing you of being a fake in order to allow you to threaten legal
>>action against them.
>>
>Balderdash. Your penchant for conspiracy theories is hereby demonstrated 
>clearly for all to see.
>
>If you believe what you've just posted, you're an even bigger fool than 
>I thought you were.
>
>>Presumably you hoped for an out-of-court settlement with a
>>confidentiality clause.
>>
>More complete and utter balderdash. Get real, Pat, and leave the 
>conspiracy theories behind you. You dug yourself a hole by believing 
>"Pete" and now all I can see are your desperate attempts to climb out of 
>it.
>
>>Well, that won't work anymore, if it ever did, will it?
>>
>There is indeed little chance of a complete invention of your weird mind 
>ever working. The proof is in your endless posts.
>
>My advice is still to sort yourself out.

Malcolm. Your behaviour is even more disgraceful for someone with a
real  Phd.

I'm now going to let you have the last word, so we can all have some
peace.

On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:40:25 +0100, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , Pat Gardiner 
> writes
>>
>>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:14:47 +0100, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>And my advice is to sort yourself out.
>>
>>I'm onto you Doctor Ogilvie.
>>
>ROFL!!!
>
>>You have a real doctorate
>
>Well done. You've got there at last. And about time, too. As a matter of 
>interest, how many mouse clicks did it take you? The record is 6 :-))
>
>So now you can put at rest all those doubts you expressed about it, led 
>by the nose, as you were, by your friend "Pete". He is the only person 
>to try to claim that I didn't have a PhD. You took your lead from him 
>More fool you when the evidence was so readily available.
>
>> and for some reason try, by your bizarre
>>behavior, stalking and harassment
>
>I have stalked no-one and harassed no-one. To claim otherwise is to 
>libel me :-)
>
>>to giad the unwary into openly
>>accusing you of being a fake in order to allow you to threaten legal
>>action against them.
>>
>Balderdash. Your penchant for conspiracy theories is hereby demonstrated 
>clearly for all to see.
>
>If you believe what you've just posted, you're an even bigger fool than 
>I thought you were.
>
>>Presumably you hoped for an out-of-court settlement with a
>>confidentiality clause.
>>
>More complete and utter balderdash. Get real, Pat, and leave the 
>conspiracy theories behind you. You dug yourself a hole by believing 
>"Pete" and now all I can see are your desperate attempts to climb out of 
>it.
>
>>Well, that won't work anymore, if it ever did, will it?
>>
>There is indeed little chance of a complete invention of your weird mind 
>ever working. The proof is in your endless posts.
>
>My advice is still to sort yourself out.

Your behaviour is even more disgraceful for someone with a real Phd.

I am now going to let you have the last word so we can all have some
peace.

-- 
Regards
Pat Gardiner
Release the results of testing British pigs for MRSA and C.Diff now!
www.go-self-sufficient.com  and http://animal-epidemics.blogspot.com/

In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>
>Your behaviour is even more disgraceful for someone with a real Phd.
>
>I am now going to let you have the last word so we can all have some
>peace.
>
Why did you post this silly message twice?

-- 
Malcolm

In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:40:25 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>My advice is still to sort yourself out.
>
>Malcolm. Your behaviour is even more disgraceful for someone with a
>real  Phd.
>
Your behaviour when you linked Karadzic with UK vets was the most 
disgraceful post you have ever made.

>I'm now going to let you have the last word, so we can all have some
>peace.
>
I doubt that very much. That will only come when you stop posting your 
nonsense.

-- 
Malcolm