On Oct 5, 12:56�pm, Uncle Al  wrote:
> Osmium wrote:
>
> > On Oct 5, 9:58 am, Uncle Al  wrote:
> > > Osmium wrote:
>
> > > > The easiest Universe to understand would be one where nothing at all
> > > > existed. Further such a Universe would have no laws (remember
> > > > "nothing" at all exists).
>
> > > > And lastly such a Universe would be infinite---because "finiteness"
> > > > like the concept of "physical laws" implies the existence of
> > > > "something"---something that limits or constrains.
>
> > > [snip rest of crap]
>
> > > Post the extent of a point. SI and Imperial units are both OK.
>
> > > --
> > > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
>
> > Extent of a point = ( planck unit & -1 planck unit) to the 3d power
> > in this universe, moron
>
> "such a Universe would be infinite" �That would then be one of the
> small infinities, yes?
>
> Res ipsa loquitur.
>
> idiot
> --
> Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> �(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Universe = everything = infinite.  "Such a Universe" refers to what
would result if there were no laws constraining size, ie "infinite".

Either you cannot understand or you are trying to set up some verbal
strawman in my post to then shoot down with your "small infinities"
argument.

You should have been smart enough to point out that anything with
"attributes" can't be nothing.