Re: The Universe explained by 3 self evident concepts
On Oct 5, 3:56 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
> Osmium wrote:
>
> > On Oct 5, 9:58 am, Uncle Al wrote:
> > > Osmium wrote:
>
> > > > The easiest Universe to understand would be one where nothing at all
> > > > existed. Further such a Universe would have no laws (remember
> > > > "nothing" at all exists).
>
> > > > And lastly such a Universe would be infinite---because "finiteness"
> > > > like the concept of "physical laws" implies the existence of
> > > > "something"---something that limits or constrains.
>
> > > [snip rest of crap]
>
> > > Post the extent of a point. SI and Imperial units are both OK.
>
> > > --
> > > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
>
> > Extent of a point = ( planck unit & -1 planck unit) to the 3d power
> > in this universe, moron
>
> "such a Universe would be infinite" That would then be one of the
> small infinities, yes?
>
> Res ipsa loquitur.
Touché
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
author: tadchem
|