|
|
|
date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:30:53 -0800 (PST),
group: uk.rec.cars.classic
back
That Kieft
The FJ (I believe) Kieft I photgraphed in 1962 is to be seen on these
two links.
Anyone know it or its story?
http://www.oldstox.com/images/kieft1.jpg
http://www.oldstox.com/images/kieft2.jpg
date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:30:53 -0800 (PST)
author: unknown
|
Re: That Kieft
In article
,
wrote:
> The FJ (I believe) Kieft I photgraphed in 1962 is to be seen on these
> two links.
> Anyone know it or its story?
> http://www.oldstox.com/images/kieft1.jpg
> http://www.oldstox.com/images/kieft2.jpg
Is it actually FJ? It appears to be fitted with a Buick V-8 - the
predecessor of the Rover V-8. Thought FJ was restricted to 1100 cc?
--
*Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:28:25 +0000 (GMT)
author: Dave Plowman (News)
|
Re: That Kieft
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:28:25 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:
>In article
>,
> wrote:
>> The FJ (I believe) Kieft I photgraphed in 1962 is to be seen on these
>> two links.
>> Anyone know it or its story?
>
>> http://www.oldstox.com/images/kieft1.jpg
>
>> http://www.oldstox.com/images/kieft2.jpg
>
>Is it actually FJ? It appears to be fitted with a Buick V-8 - the
>predecessor of the Rover V-8. Thought FJ was restricted to 1100 cc?
Erm, no, it wouldn't be eligible for FJ - it's a hillclimber. The
suggestion was that it was an ex-FJ chassis. Looks more like a 500cc
F3 to me - bet the driver didn't suffer a lot with constipation!
--
Ian D
date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:41:36 +0000
author: Ian Dalziel
|
|
|
