|
|
|
date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:55:42 +1100,
group: uk.rec.cars.classic
back
What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
Has someone any idea what car this is please. Some may have owned one :)
http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
r
date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:55:42 +1100
author: Rob
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
Rob wrote:
>
> Has someone any idea what car this is please. Some may have owned one :)
>
> http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
My uninformed guess would be Renault, with that coal-skuttle bonnet.
date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:38:12 +0000
author: Willy Eckerslyke
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
"Rob" wrote in message
news:474ffa3e$1_6@news.peopletelecom.com.au...
>
> Has someone any idea what car this is please. Some may have owned one :)
>
> http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>
> r
>
Renault, possibly Edwardian, but not an expert so wouldn't like to be more
precise.
Geoff MacK
date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:31:27 -0000
author: Geoff Mackenzie
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
Rob (Rob ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:
> Has someone any idea what car this is please. Some may have owned one :)
>
> http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
Third vote for a Renault of some type, I'd hazard a guess at 19teens. The
bonnet & radiator is a dead giveaway as to the marque.
date: 30 Nov 2007 15:28:54 GMT
author: Adrian
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
Adrian wrote:
> Rob (Rob ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
>> Has someone any idea what car this is please. Some may have owned one :)
>>
>> http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>
> Third vote for a Renault of some type, I'd hazard a guess at 19teens. The
> bonnet & radiator is a dead giveaway as to the marque.
Aye, I've just been doing a web trawl without much success. The
mudguards look wrong, but were probably a modification.
Mind you, Arrol-Johnstons had similar looking fronts and similarly hefty
mudguards...
date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:08:02 +0000
author: Willy Eckerslyke
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
"Adrian" wrote in message
news:47502c35$0$47104$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
> Rob (Rob ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
>> Has someone any idea what car this is please. Some may have owned one :)
>>
>> http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>
> Third vote for a Renault of some type, I'd hazard a guess at 19teens. The
> bonnet & radiator is a dead giveaway as to the marque.
IIRC it would have had a single headlamp. Ideal for the bloke with the hat.
GMacK
date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:46:17 -0000
author: Geoff Mackenzie
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
"Willy Eckerslyke" wrote in message
news:5raqqtF1382dgU1@mid.individual.net...
> Adrian wrote:
>> Rob (Rob ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
>> they were saying:
>>
>>> Has someone any idea what car this is please. Some may have owned one :)
>>>
>>> http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>>
>> Third vote for a Renault of some type, I'd hazard a guess at 19teens. The
>> bonnet & radiator is a dead giveaway as to the marque.
>
> Aye, I've just been doing a web trawl without much success. The mudguards
> look wrong, but were probably a modification.
> Mind you, Arrol-Johnstons had similar looking fronts and similarly hefty
> mudguards...
While several makers used this layout at the beginning of the 1900's, one
would normally bet on Renault because they made more cars this way than just
about everyone else put together and they did it for longer. But in this
case I agree with Willy because of the actual positioning of the radiator.
Renault and most others put it right up against the dashboard, whereas
Arrol-Johnston had a vestigial scuttle in between the two, like the car in
the photo.
Ron Robinson
date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:48:40 -0000
author: R.N. Robinson
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
R.N. Robinson wrote:
> "Willy Eckerslyke" wrote in message
> news:5raqqtF1382dgU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>>Adrian wrote:
>>
>>>Rob (Rob ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
>>>they were saying:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Has someone any idea what car this is please. Some may have owned one :)
>>>>
>>>>http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>>>
>>>Third vote for a Renault of some type, I'd hazard a guess at 19teens. The
>>>bonnet & radiator is a dead giveaway as to the marque.
>>
>>Aye, I've just been doing a web trawl without much success. The mudguards
>>look wrong, but were probably a modification.
>>Mind you, Arrol-Johnstons had similar looking fronts and similarly hefty
>>mudguards...
>
>
> While several makers used this layout at the beginning of the 1900's, one
> would normally bet on Renault because they made more cars this way than just
> about everyone else put together and they did it for longer. But in this
> case I agree with Willy because of the actual positioning of the radiator.
> Renault and most others put it right up against the dashboard, whereas
> Arrol-Johnston had a vestigial scuttle in between the two, like the car in
> the photo.
>
> Ron Robinson
>
>
Having a clue, I did an image search in google and found this.
www.interesting-cars.com/aboutus.html
This has a picture of the Arrol - Johnston 1913 which is looking very
similar. It does have that space between the radiator and the screen.
Although the front guards look as though they have been cut short.
Rm
date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:42:10 +1100
author: Rob. .
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:08:02 +0000, Willy Eckerslyke
wrote:
>Mind you, Arrol-Johnstons had similar looking fronts and similarly hefty
>mudguards...
I'd agree with the Arrol-Johnston. They had a rectangular header tank
to the radiator, unlike Renault's arched style.
date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:57:43 +0000
author: Andy Dingley
|
Re: What car is this? - sorry without the attached file
Andy Dingley wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:08:02 +0000, Willy Eckerslyke
> wrote:
>
>
>>Mind you, Arrol-Johnstons had similar looking fronts and similarly hefty
>>mudguards...
>
>
> I'd agree with the Arrol-Johnston. They had a rectangular header tank
> to the radiator, unlike Renault's arched style.
I have also asked the - Surrey Vintage Vehicle Society www.svvs.org
which only meets once a month.
But googling images of the Arrol-Johnson they seem to fit.
rob
date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:55:13 +1100
author: Rob. .
|
Re: What car is this? AD for the AJ
R.N. Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>>Third vote for a Renault of some type, I'd hazard a guess at 19teens. The
>>>bonnet & radiator is a dead giveaway as to the marque.
>>
>>Aye, I've just been doing a web trawl without much success. The mudguards
>>look wrong, but were probably a modification.
>>Mind you, Arrol-Johnstons had similar looking fronts and similarly hefty
>>mudguards...
>
>
> While several makers used this layout at the beginning of the 1900's, one
> would normally bet on Renault because they made more cars this way than just
> about everyone else put together and they did it for longer. But in this
> case I agree with Willy because of the actual positioning of the radiator.
> Renault and most others put it right up against the dashboard, whereas
> Arrol-Johnston had a vestigial scuttle in between the two, like the car in
> the photo.
>
> Ron Robinson
>
>
Although possibly not the exact model but this is an ad from an early
motoring booklet publication date unknown but very early.
http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/AD-car-AJ.html
in the photo there is a hurricane lamp hanging off the front guard
The car would be dated around 1918/1922 and the owner was a sniper
during the first world war.
rm
date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:05:15 +1100
author: Rob. .
|
Re: What car is this?
http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
Placing the car up on the Surry Vintage Vehicle Society
They have come back with the suggestion that it is a 1912 Arrol-Johnson
15.9HP
www.svvs.org/help14.shtml
Thanks to all for pointing me in the correct direction of it being a
Arrol-Johnson.
What I had not realized was the amount of car imports into Australia in
the early 1900's.
rob
date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:47:39 +1100
author: Rob. .
|
Re: What car is this?
"Rob." <mesa@mine.com.> wrote in message
news:476df679$1_9@news.peopletelecom.com.au...
> http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>
> Placing the car up on the Surry Vintage Vehicle Society
>
> They have come back with the suggestion that it is a 1912 Arrol-Johnson
> 15.9HP
>
> www.svvs.org/help14.shtml
>
> Thanks to all for pointing me in the correct direction of it being a
> Arrol-Johnson.
>
> What I had not realized was the amount of car imports into Australia in
> the early 1900's.
>
>
Well, they had to get them from somewhere. For a considerable part of the
country the only viable alternative means of transport was the camel and
they had been importing those as well.
Ron Robinson
date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:02:59 -0000
author: R.N. Robinson
|
Re: What car is this?
On 23 Dec, 05:47, "Rob." <m...@mine.com.> wrote:
> http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>
> Placing the car up on the Surry Vintage Vehicle Society
>
> They have come back with the suggestion that it is a 1912 Arrol-Johnson
> 15.9HP
>
> www.svvs.org/help14.shtml
>
> Thanks to all for pointing me in the correct direction of it being a
> Arrol-Johnson.
The Glasgow Transport Museum has an excellent - probably the
definitive - collection of early Scottish cars. It might be worth
contacting them for further information.
Ian
date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:28:17 -0800 (PST)
author: Ian
|
Re: What car is this?
R.N. Robinson wrote:
> "Rob." <mesa@mine.com.> wrote in message
> news:476df679$1_9@news.peopletelecom.com.au...
>
>>http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>>
>>Placing the car up on the Surry Vintage Vehicle Society
>>
>>They have come back with the suggestion that it is a 1912 Arrol-Johnson
>>15.9HP
>>
>>www.svvs.org/help14.shtml
>>
>>Thanks to all for pointing me in the correct direction of it being a
>>Arrol-Johnson.
>>
>>What I had not realized was the amount of car imports into Australia in
>>the early 1900's.
>>
>>
>
>
> Well, they had to get them from somewhere. For a considerable part of the
> country the only viable alternative means of transport was the camel and
> they had been importing those as well.
>
> Ron Robinson
>
>
Interesting cemetery at Bourke NSW, there are quite a few camel drivers
buried there - Afghans - from the early years of settlement.
date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:04:37 +1100
author: Rob. .
|
Re: What car is this?
"Rob." <mesa@mine.com.> wrote in message
news:476fa053_5@news.peopletelecom.com.au...
> R.N. Robinson wrote:
>> "Rob." <mesa@mine.com.> wrote in message
>> news:476df679$1_9@news.peopletelecom.com.au...
>>
>>>http://home.people.net.au/~petebrag/CAR/CAR-(Large).html
>>>
>>>Placing the car up on the Surry Vintage Vehicle Society
>>>
>>>They have come back with the suggestion that it is a 1912 Arrol-Johnson
>>>15.9HP
>>>
>>>www.svvs.org/help14.shtml
>>>
>>>Thanks to all for pointing me in the correct direction of it being a
>>>Arrol-Johnson.
>>>
>>>What I had not realized was the amount of car imports into Australia in
>>>the early 1900's.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Well, they had to get them from somewhere. For a considerable part of the
>> country the only viable alternative means of transport was the camel and
>> they had been importing those as well.
>>
>> Ron Robinson
>
> Interesting cemetery at Bourke NSW, there are quite a few camel drivers
> buried there - Afghans - from the early years of settlement.
The camels, on the other hand, have multiplied and there are now -
allegedly - more wild camels in Australia than any other country on the
planet.
Ron Robinson
date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:47:34 -0000
author: R.N. Robinson
|
|
|