I haven't seen this petition
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)

Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

Jim

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Jim Warren wrote:
> I haven't seen this petition
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
> 
> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.

I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
wording before starting the damned thing.

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Jim Warren wrote:
>> I haven't seen this petition
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>> 
>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>
>I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>wording before starting the damned thing.

Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
-- 
Roger Hunt

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Jim Warren wrote:
>> I haven't seen this petition
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>> 
>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>
>I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>wording before starting the damned thing.

Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
-- 
Roger Hunt

Roger Hunt wrote:
> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>
>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>> wording before starting the damned thing.
> 
> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?

No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
intended to be taken seriously.

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Jim Warren wrote:
>> I haven't seen this petition
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>> 
>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>
>I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>wording before starting the damned thing.

Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
-- 
Roger Hunt

Roger Hunt wrote:
> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>
>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>> wording before starting the damned thing.
> 
> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?

No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
intended to be taken seriously.

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Roger Hunt wrote:
>> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>>
>>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>>> wording before starting the damned thing.
>> 
>> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
>
>No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
>end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
>intended to be taken seriously.

Quite right. It does look as if it was born in a heated moment, and
fired off before the recommended Count to Ten had been performed.
-- 
Roger Hunt

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Jim Warren wrote:
>> I haven't seen this petition
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>> 
>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>
>I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>wording before starting the damned thing.

Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
-- 
Roger Hunt

Roger Hunt wrote:
> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>
>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>> wording before starting the damned thing.
> 
> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?

No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
intended to be taken seriously.

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Roger Hunt wrote:
>> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>>
>>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>>> wording before starting the damned thing.
>> 
>> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
>
>No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
>end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
>intended to be taken seriously.

Quite right. It does look as if it was born in a heated moment, and
fired off before the recommended Count to Ten had been performed.
-- 
Roger Hunt

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Jim Warren wrote:
>> I haven't seen this petition
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>> 
>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>
>I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>wording before starting the damned thing.

Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
-- 
Roger Hunt

Roger Hunt wrote:
> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>
>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>> wording before starting the damned thing.
> 
> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?

No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
intended to be taken seriously.

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Roger Hunt wrote:
>> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>>
>>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>>> wording before starting the damned thing.
>> 
>> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
>
>No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
>end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
>intended to be taken seriously.

Quite right. It does look as if it was born in a heated moment, and
fired off before the recommended Count to Ten had been performed.
-- 
Roger Hunt

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Jim Warren wrote:
>> I haven't seen this petition
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>> 
>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>
>I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>wording before starting the damned thing.

Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
-- 
Roger Hunt

Roger Hunt wrote:
> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>
>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>> wording before starting the damned thing.
> 
> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?

No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
intended to be taken seriously.

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Roger Hunt wrote:
>> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>>
>>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>>> wording before starting the damned thing.
>> 
>> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
>
>No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
>end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
>intended to be taken seriously.

Quite right. It does look as if it was born in a heated moment, and
fired off before the recommended Count to Ten had been performed.
-- 
Roger Hunt

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Jim Warren wrote:
>> I haven't seen this petition
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>> 
>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>
>I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>wording before starting the damned thing.

Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
-- 
Roger Hunt

Roger Hunt wrote:
> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>
>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>> wording before starting the damned thing.
> 
> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?

No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
intended to be taken seriously.

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Roger Hunt wrote:
>> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>>
>>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>>> wording before starting the damned thing.
>> 
>> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
>
>No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
>end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
>intended to be taken seriously.

Quite right. It does look as if it was born in a heated moment, and
fired off before the recommended Count to Ten had been performed.
-- 
Roger Hunt

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Jim Warren wrote:
>> I haven't seen this petition
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>> 
>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>
>I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>wording before starting the damned thing.

Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
-- 
Roger Hunt

Roger Hunt wrote:
> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>
>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>> wording before starting the damned thing.
> 
> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?

No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
intended to be taken seriously.

Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>Roger Hunt wrote:
>> Willy Eckerslyke wrote
>>> Jim Warren wrote:
>>>> I haven't seen this petition
>>>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Classic-Cars/
>>>> mentioned here before (or have I missed it?)
>>>>
>>>> Currently there are just over 11,000 signatures asking the PM to reject 
>>>> any proposals to ban or restrict the use of older cars.
>>> I've signed it, but I do wish he'd asked someone to proof read the 
>>> wording before starting the damned thing.
>> 
>> Motorcycles and old trade vehicles not included?
>
>No I was only referring to the typo and the errant commas. Hardly the 
>end of the world, but they do make it look rather amateurish when it's 
>intended to be taken seriously.

Quite right. It does look as if it was born in a heated moment, and
fired off before the recommended Count to Ten had been performed.
-- 
Roger Hunt