Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
religion
buddhist
christian
hindu
interfaith
islam
misc
other-faiths
pagan
  
 
date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:10:11 +0100,    group: uk.religion.pagan        back       
English heritage at risk   
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/architecture_and_design/article4294865.ece
or http://tinyurl.com/5jhpq6

Thoughts? (Apart from the fact that the article is about one country
only) Which comment do you agree more with - we should let it all fall
down, or we should shore it all up?


-- 
Bring on the wonder, we got it all wrong
We pushed you down deep in our souls for too long
date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:10:11 +0100   author:   Halla

Re: English heritage at risk   
Halla wrote:

> Which comment do you agree more with - we should let it all fall down,
> or we should shore it all up?

How about do both, and look at each case on an individual basis, and
decide sensibly. Not all 'listed' stuff is born equal, iyswim.

--
trin
date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:25:59 -0700 (PDT)   author:   trin

Re: English heritage at risk   
I can see me losing many hours if I stay on the At Risk site too long.

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.19074

--
trin
and yes, now I *am* going :p
date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:55:17 -0700 (PDT)   author:   trin

Re: English heritage at risk   
trin wrote:

> I can see me losing many hours if I stay on the At Risk site too long.
> 
> http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.19074

I may be biased, but the Scottish one's even more tempting...

http://www.buildingsatrisk.org.uk/BAR/

-- 
Caroline
There is no such thing as a snooze button on a cat that wants breakfast.
date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:29:33 +0000 (UTC)   author:   Caroline Jones

Re: English heritage at risk   
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:25:59 -0700 (PDT), trin
 blethered:

>Halla wrote:
>
>> Which comment do you agree more with - we should let it all fall down,
>> or we should shore it all up?
>
>How about do both, and look at each case on an individual basis, and
>decide sensibly. Not all 'listed' stuff is born equal, iyswim.

Which is a good point. I still haven't waded through the list on the
relevent site, but the impression I got from that article of English
Heritage uttering cries of 'Big houses... castles... oh! battlefields!
Henges! Stones! Places where things used to be!' were bemusing me a
little. <g> If we kept them all as they were soon there'd be nowhere
for the living to go. 


-- 
Bring on the wonder, we got it all wrong
We pushed you down deep in our souls for too long
date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:14:15 +0100   author:   Halla

Re: English heritage at risk   
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:29:33 +0000 (UTC), "Caroline Jones"
 blethered:

>trin wrote:
>
>> I can see me losing many hours if I stay on the At Risk site too long.
>> 
>> http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.19074
>
>I may be biased, but the Scottish one's even more tempting...
>
>http://www.buildingsatrisk.org.uk/BAR/

It's not, it's depressing. :-/ And this is before I look at it again.
Don't know why a building should matter so much, really, but I always
feel a bit glum if a good'un disappears.

<clickety> Ooh, spiffy update to the site though, last I looked it was
still old and clunky.

Oh dear. I *was* going to sleep... <looks through list of local
properties>


-- 
Bring on the wonder, we got it all wrong
We pushed you down deep in our souls for too long
date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:21:54 +0100   author:   Halla

Re: English heritage at risk   
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:55:17 -0700 (PDT), trin
 blethered:

>I can see me losing many hours if I stay on the At Risk site too long.
>
>http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.19074

I know that feeling. :-)


-- 
Bring on the wonder, we got it all wrong
We pushed you down deep in our souls for too long
date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:22:03 +0100   author:   Halla

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us