Actually, please don't, because I'm trying to work out if my posts are
getting through, 'cause I'm not sure I trust Ggroups sometimes to not
loose any of my posts in the ether, and I do so hate having to wait
AGES to see my own posts appear.
</strop>

:)

--
trin

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:22:05 -0700 (PDT), trin
 blethered:

>Actually, please don't, because I'm trying to work out if my posts are
>getting through, 'cause I'm not sure I trust Ggroups sometimes to not
>loose any of my posts in the ether, and I do so hate having to wait
>AGES to see my own posts appear.
></strop>
>
>:)

Aw diddums. <g> Some of us have ourselves killfiled and so we *never*
see our own posts appear. ;-) (Got fed up thinking 'ooh! new posts!'
when it was just me being overposty again. ;-)


-- 
Bring on the wonder, we got it all wrong
We pushed you down deep in our souls for too long

"trin"  wrote in message 
news:ec30a332-8849-4527-a9c8-e68903d60e21@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
> Actually, please don't, because I'm trying to work out if my posts are
> getting through, 'cause I'm not sure I trust Ggroups sometimes to not
> loose any of my posts in the ether, and I do so hate having to wait
> AGES to see my own posts appear.
> </strop>
>
> :)
>

They're getting through grand, Trin

"Halla"  wrote in message 
news:21g674hvd4h7fbon4q7jeceggiilc5nugg@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:22:05 -0700 (PDT), trin
>  blethered:
>
>>Actually, please don't, because I'm trying to work out if my posts are
>>getting through, 'cause I'm not sure I trust Ggroups sometimes to not
>>loose any of my posts in the ether, and I do so hate having to wait
>>AGES to see my own posts appear.
>></strop>
>>
>>:)
>
> Aw diddums. <g> Some of us have ourselves killfiled and so we *never*
> see our own posts appear. ;-) (Got fed up thinking 'ooh! new posts!'
> when it was just me being overposty again. ;-)

You don't need to killfile yourself. I don't know if  Forte Agent supports 
message rules but with oe I just put a message rule in that changes the 
colour of my posts and marks them as read. I would imagine that a commercial 
reader like  Forte Agent  should be able to do something similar.

trin wrote:
> Actually, please don't, because I'm trying to work out if my posts are
> getting through, 'cause I'm not sure I trust Ggroups sometimes to not
> loose any of my posts in the ether, and I do so hate having to wait
> AGES to see my own posts appear.
> </strop>
>
> :)

No; I'm sorry but your post doesn't seem to have appeared in this group.

-- 

http://kkomp.com - Delving beyond the comfort zone.
Check out the kkomp RSS feed http://kkomp.com/kkompRSS.xml

http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
Personalised Desktop Computers

On 8 Jul, 02:22, trin wrote:

> I do so hate having to wait AGES to see my own posts appear.

24 hours, given the time this turned up, just. *sigh*

Forgive me if I seem a little slow.

:p

--
trin

"trin"  wrote in message 
news:41141f0c-7bca-4ef7-b565-daf211483c8a@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On 8 Jul, 02:22, trin wrote:
>
>> I do so hate having to wait AGES to see my own posts appear.
>
> 24 hours, given the time this turned up, just. *sigh*
>
> Forgive me if I seem a little slow.
>
> :p

Do you ever post on yahoo groups? I posted on one only last week and it took 
4 days to appear. I posted some after the origional and they appeared before 
the origional did.

There's no denying it, the internet is plane wierd.

Halla wrote:

> Aw diddums. <g>

:p

> Some of us have ourselves killfiled and so we *never*
> see our own posts appear. ;-) (Got fed up thinking 'ooh! new posts!'
> when it was just me being overposty again. ;-)

Yeah, I tried doing that back when I wasn't using Ggroups, and then
used to panic because I couldn't tell if my posts were getting through
or not. <g>

--
trin

Flower of romance wrote:

> They're getting through grand, Trin

You put the comma in the wrong place. :p

--
trin

Dr.Hal0nf1r£$ wrote:

> No; I'm sorry but your post doesn't seem to have appeared in this group.

Damn! Gonna have to try again.

Thank you for your assistance. :)

--
trin

"trin"  wrote in message 
news:e3714eec-74b2-4335-96ce-74d769b7b33d@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> Flower of romance wrote:
>
>> They're getting through grand, Trin
>
> You put the comma in the wrong place. :p


Did I? I thought you always put one before a name.

On 9 Jul, 02:09, "Flower of romance"  wrote:

> Do you ever post on yahoo groups?

I try not to.

> I posted on one only last week and it took 4 days to appear. I posted some
> after the origional and they appeared before the origional did.

That happens even with a good newsreader sometimes though. It's all
down to what gets directed which way, and what gets held up where, I'd
assume. Geeks, feel free to poke me if I'm wrong. *crosses stuff in
hope*

--
trin

"trin"  wrote in message 
news:f082f6fc-b2e2-48d2-8904-820985488f20@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 9 Jul, 02:09, "Flower of romance"  wrote:
>
>> Do you ever post on yahoo groups?
>
> I try not to.

It's not bad. It has it's moments
>
>> I posted on one only last week and it took 4 days to appear. I posted 
>> some
>> after the origional and they appeared before the origional did.
>
> That happens even with a good newsreader sometimes though. It's all
> down to what gets directed which way, and what gets held up where, I'd
> assume. Geeks, feel free to poke me if I'm wrong. *crosses stuff in
> hope*

Nop. What you said sounds spot on. Of course there are the rumours that if 
you put words like BOMB or Terrorist in there then it gets rerouted. ;)

Flower of romance wrote:
> trin wrote

> >> They're getting through grand, Trin
> > You put the comma in the wrong place. :p
> Did I? I thought you always put one before a name.

In most circumstances, yes, but in this case, I'd suggest the comma'd
work better being placed before the word that you put it after. :p

--
trin

On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 03:50:11 -0700 (PDT), trin
 blethered:

>Halla wrote:
>
>> Aw diddums. <g>
>
>:p
>
>> Some of us have ourselves killfiled and so we *never*
>> see our own posts appear. ;-) (Got fed up thinking 'ooh! new posts!'
>> when it was just me being overposty again. ;-)
>
>Yeah, I tried doing that back when I wasn't using Ggroups, and then
>used to panic because I couldn't tell if my posts were getting through
>or not. <g>

Heh. I've had a few moments like that myself, although usually for me
it takes three days or so before I realise that the messages *haven't*
got through. :-) My one posts are marked read, so I should be able to
see them if they arrived, which is something at least.


-- 
Bring on the wonder, we got it all wrong
We pushed you down deep in our souls for too long

trin wrote:
> I do so hate having to wait AGES to see my own posts appear.
> </strop>

And now I've said that, they've been showing up all day. *rolls eyes*

Mind you, even showin' up this quick still leaves me sittin' waitin'
for AGES.

<grin>

--
trin
shutting down and going to bed

"trin"  wrote in message 
news:73a22a59-b3c8-4367-98c4-0611b7446521@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> Flower of romance wrote:
>> trin wrote
>
>> >> They're getting through grand, Trin
>> > You put the comma in the wrong place. :p
>> Did I? I thought you always put one before a name.
>
> In most circumstances, yes, but in this case, I'd suggest the comma'd
> work better being placed before the word that you put it after. :p
>

You mean, "They're getting through, grand Trin"

Grand Trin.. :)

trin  wrote:

> Flower of romance wrote:
> > trin wrote
> 
> > >> They're getting through grand, Trin
> > > You put the comma in the wrong place. :p
> > Did I? I thought you always put one before a name.
> 
> In most circumstances, yes, but in this case, I'd suggest the comma'd
> work better being placed before the word that you put it after. :p

I agree. That flower did not see your point at once just shows
his/her/its ignorance of urp.


-- 
http://www.decohen.com
Send e-mail to the Reply-To address;
mail to the From address is never read

Daniel Cohen wrote:
> trin wrote:
> > Flower of romance wrote:

> > > >> They're getting through grand, Trin
> > > > You put the comma in the wrong place. :p
> > > Did I? I thought you always put one before a name.
> > In most circumstances, yes, but in this case, I'd suggest the comma'd
> > work better being placed before the word that you put it after. :p
> I agree. That flower did not see your point at once just shows
> his/her/its ignorance of urp.

Yes, and un/fortunately, I don't think FoR has the type of mentality
to ever /really/ be able to "get" URP.

Oh well, it at least generates conversation while trying. :)

--
trin