On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:24:28 +0100, "Flower of romance"
 blethered:

<kersnip!>
>The answer isn't nonsense. You just don't understand it and of course as you 
>seem to think you control the opinions of the masses that you comprehension 
>is absolute. esides. I don't waste your bandwidth. You chose to read the 
>message so you wasted your own bandwidth. You are free to killfile me just 
>as I am free to killfile you.

Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
is one of the longest threads here at the moment! 

;->


-- 
"...responsibility and delight can co-exist..."
 -Philip Pullman

"Halla"  wrote in message 
news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:24:28 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>  blethered:
>
> <kersnip!>
>>The answer isn't nonsense. You just don't understand it and of course as 
>>you
>>seem to think you control the opinions of the masses that you 
>>comprehension
>>is absolute. esides. I don't waste your bandwidth. You chose to read the
>>message so you wasted your own bandwidth. You are free to killfile me just
>>as I am free to killfile you.
>
> Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
> is one of the longest threads here at the moment!

Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.

>
> ;->
>
>
> -- 
> "...responsibility and delight can co-exist..."
> -Philip Pullman

"trin"  wrote in message 
news:cb295c9d-5642-4fd0-b0d2-7a65c8699b2f@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Halla wrote:
>
>> Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
>> is one of the longest threads here at the moment!
>
> It is kinda, innit. You'd think, with all the conversations in the
> archives going on about cross-posting and URP and Usenet etiquette,
> that <strike>trolls</s> n00bs who think they know the answers to life,
> the universe, and everything'd at least do a little research on the
> subject before trying to engage in *cough* intelligent conversation
> about it.
>
> Please note however, that I have at least been good and given up
> baiting the troll.
>

LOL. I get it. Anyone  who disagrees with you or responds to your taunts in 
kind is a troll. Well remember *you* started this dance and in your game you 
are the only one with the right to kick off but this isn't your game. If you 
think that because i have a past from my long gone drunken days that it's 
open season to pick a fight with me and i won't bite back then think again. 
I can handle you any day.

*Chortle*

> O: )
>
> --
> trin
> being as tringelic as ever

"Halla"  wrote in message 
news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:24:28 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>  blethered:
>
> <kersnip!>
>>The answer isn't nonsense. You just don't understand it and of course as 
>>you
>>seem to think you control the opinions of the masses that you 
>>comprehension
>>is absolute. esides. I don't waste your bandwidth. You chose to read the
>>message so you wasted your own bandwidth. You are free to killfile me just
>>as I am free to killfile you.
>
> Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
> is one of the longest threads here at the moment!

I don't killfile (except when it's my Aussie mate on a post-bombing trip, 
because he gets in the way of reading everyone else :) However, I'm not 
interested in feeding the troll much further; I just think it's remarkably 
creepy that he keeps coming back here when there's all of alt* to go at.

Jani

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:18:45 -0700 (PDT), trin
 blethered:

>Halla wrote:
>
>> Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
>> is one of the longest threads here at the moment!
>
>It is kinda, innit. You'd think, with all the conversations in the
>archives going on about cross-posting and URP and Usenet etiquette,
>that <strike>trolls</s> n00bs who think they know the answers to life,
>the universe, and everything'd at least do a little research on the
>subject before trying to engage in *cough* intelligent conversation
>about it.

I wouldn't, no. Why would you think so? <g>

>
>Please note however, that I have at least been good and given up
>baiting the troll.
>
>O: )

Oh you're only saying that to try and make Jani look bad. ;-)


-- 
"...responsibility and delight can co-exist..."
 -Philip Pullman

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
 blethered:

>
>"Halla"  wrote in message 
>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:24:28 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>  blethered:
>>
>> <kersnip!>
>>>The answer isn't nonsense. You just don't understand it and of course as 
>>>you
>>>seem to think you control the opinions of the masses that you 
>>>comprehension
>>>is absolute. esides. I don't waste your bandwidth. You chose to read the
>>>message so you wasted your own bandwidth. You are free to killfile me just
>>>as I am free to killfile you.
>>
>> Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
>> is one of the longest threads here at the moment!
>
>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.

So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all. 


-- 
"...responsibility and delight can co-exist..."
 -Philip Pullman

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:52:09 +0100, "Jani" 
blethered:

>
>"Halla"  wrote in message 
>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:24:28 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>  blethered:
>>
>> <kersnip!>
>>>The answer isn't nonsense. You just don't understand it and of course as 
>>>you
>>>seem to think you control the opinions of the masses that you 
>>>comprehension
>>>is absolute. esides. I don't waste your bandwidth. You chose to read the
>>>message so you wasted your own bandwidth. You are free to killfile me just
>>>as I am free to killfile you.
>>
>> Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
>> is one of the longest threads here at the moment!
>
>I don't killfile (except when it's my Aussie mate on a post-bombing trip, 
>because he gets in the way of reading everyone else :) However, I'm not 
>interested in feeding the troll much further; I just think it's remarkably 
>creepy that he keeps coming back here when there's all of alt* to go at.

Hmm, question of audiences, innit? Obviously spotted a gap here in
that there aren't any trolls jumping up and down and gibbering
randomly[1], whereas my recollection of alt.* is that there are more
than a few folk fitting that description. <g> </snob>

[1] We have to rely on the regulars for that, obviously.


-- 
"...responsibility and delight can co-exist..."
 -Philip Pullman

"Halla"  wrote in message 
news:fdul54lb9s5ahc7loqfbp4172pf4s22r2r@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>  blethered:
>
>>
>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:24:28 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>  blethered:
>>>
>>> <kersnip!>
>>>>The answer isn't nonsense. You just don't understand it and of course as
>>>>you
>>>>seem to think you control the opinions of the masses that you
>>>>comprehension
>>>>is absolute. esides. I don't waste your bandwidth. You chose to read the
>>>>message so you wasted your own bandwidth. You are free to killfile me 
>>>>just
>>>>as I am free to killfile you.
>>>
>>> Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
>>> is one of the longest threads here at the moment!
>>
>>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.
>
> So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all.

Old anger issues not so old after all. Forgive me.

>
>
> -- 
> "...responsibility and delight can co-exist..."
> -Philip Pullman

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:31:16 +0100, "Flower of romance"
 blethered:

>
>"Halla"  wrote in message 
>news:fdul54lb9s5ahc7loqfbp4172pf4s22r2r@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>  blethered:
>>
>>>
>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:24:28 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>>  blethered:
>>>>
>>>> <kersnip!>
>>>>>The answer isn't nonsense. You just don't understand it and of course as
>>>>>you
>>>>>seem to think you control the opinions of the masses that you
>>>>>comprehension
>>>>>is absolute. esides. I don't waste your bandwidth. You chose to read the
>>>>>message so you wasted your own bandwidth. You are free to killfile me 
>>>>>just
>>>>>as I am free to killfile you.
>>>>
>>>> Please somebody killfile *somebody*, I'm becoming depressed that this
>>>> is one of the longest threads here at the moment!
>>>
>>>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.
>>
>> So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all.
>
>Old anger issues not so old after all. Forgive me.

That depends what you do from now on, really.


-- 
"...responsibility and delight can co-exist..."
 -Philip Pullman

"Halla"  wrote in message 
news:rgvl54thtd44t36smkr91rcrm4vjddb4rv@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:31:16 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>  blethered:
>
>>
>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>news:fdul54lb9s5ahc7loqfbp4172pf4s22r2r@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>  blethered:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...

>>>>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.
>>>
>>> So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all.
>>
>>Old anger issues not so old after all. Forgive me.
>
> That depends what you do from now on, really.

Do? well I just went on a bike ride. ;) If you're worried about me trolling 
then don't. That's not what I do and despite what people think, that's never 
what I do (well not since Igave up the booze over three years ago anyway) 
Before that was pretty much a blur anyway. The trouble is that when one is 
suddenly  forced to give up such a dependency it leaves a psychological 
mark. I'm telling you this not because I'm trying to excuse my past but 
because you don't read as a troll or one of those hipocrites that try to 
provoke me then get upset when i respond; that and i really like you 
signatures. :). I've come a long way in the last three years but i've still 
got a long way to go. Whether the others beleive me or not is thier problem 
and they should deal with it, or not as they see fit. However I shall ignore 
their taunts for my sake as much as anyones.

>
>
> -- 
> "...responsibility and delight can co-exist..."
> -Philip Pullman

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:23:33 +0100, "Flower of romance"
 blethered:

>
>"Halla"  wrote in message 
>news:rgvl54thtd44t36smkr91rcrm4vjddb4rv@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:31:16 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>  blethered:
>>
>>>
>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>news:fdul54lb9s5ahc7loqfbp4172pf4s22r2r@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>>  blethered:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>
>>>>>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.
>>>>
>>>> So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all.
>>>
>>>Old anger issues not so old after all. Forgive me.
>>
>> That depends what you do from now on, really.
>
>Do? well I just went on a bike ride. ;) If you're worried about me trolling 
>then don't. That's not what I do and despite what people think, that's never 
>what I do (well not since Igave up the booze over three years ago anyway) 
>Before that was pretty much a blur anyway. The trouble is that when one is 
>suddenly  forced to give up such a dependency it leaves a psychological 
>mark. I'm telling you this not because I'm trying to excuse my past but 
>because you don't read as a troll or one of those hipocrites that try to 
>provoke me then get upset when i respond; that and i really like you 
>signatures. :). I've come a long way in the last three years but i've still 
>got a long way to go. Whether the others beleive me or not is thier problem 
>and they should deal with it, or not as they see fit. However I shall ignore 
>their taunts for my sake as much as anyones.

I meant that I'll wait and see what happens and proceed from there.
Thank you for liking the sigs. 


-- 
Forget about the notion
That our emotions can be kept at bay
Forget about being guilty
We are innocent instead

"Halla"  wrote in message 
news:u5eo541lfbses2llie3g0s18nodv2bjotp@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:23:33 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>  blethered:
>
>>
>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>news:rgvl54thtd44t36smkr91rcrm4vjddb4rv@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:31:16 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>  blethered:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>news:fdul54lb9s5ahc7loqfbp4172pf4s22r2r@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>>>  blethered:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>>>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>>
>>>>>>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.
>>>>>
>>>>> So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all.
>>>>
>>>>Old anger issues not so old after all. Forgive me.
>>>
>>> That depends what you do from now on, really.
>>
>>Do? well I just went on a bike ride. ;) If you're worried about me 
>>trolling
>>then don't. That's not what I do and despite what people think, that's 
>>never
>>what I do (well not since Igave up the booze over three years ago anyway)
>>Before that was pretty much a blur anyway. The trouble is that when one is
>>suddenly  forced to give up such a dependency it leaves a psychological
>>mark. I'm telling you this not because I'm trying to excuse my past but
>>because you don't read as a troll or one of those hipocrites that try to
>>provoke me then get upset when i respond; that and i really like you
>>signatures. :). I've come a long way in the last three years but i've 
>>still
>>got a long way to go. Whether the others beleive me or not is thier 
>>problem
>>and they should deal with it, or not as they see fit. However I shall 
>>ignore
>>their taunts for my sake as much as anyones.
>
> I meant that I'll wait and see what happens and proceed from there.
> Thank you for liking the sigs.
>

Waiting is what we all do. :)

>
> -- 
> Forget about the notion
> That our emotions can be kept at bay
> Forget about being guilty
> We are innocent instead

"Flower of romance"  wrote in message 
news:0eV6k.17893$7m7.4909@newsfe30.ams2...
>
> "Halla"  wrote in message 
> news:rgvl54thtd44t36smkr91rcrm4vjddb4rv@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:31:16 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>  blethered:
>>
>>>
>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>news:fdul54lb9s5ahc7loqfbp4172pf4s22r2r@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>>  blethered:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>
>>>>>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.
>>>>
>>>> So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all.
>>>
>>>Old anger issues not so old after all. Forgive me.
>>
>> That depends what you do from now on, really.
>
> Do? well I just went on a bike ride. ;) If you're worried about me 
> trolling then don't. That's not what I do and despite what people think, 
> that's never what I do (well not since Igave up the booze over three years 
> ago anyway) Before that was pretty much a blur anyway. The trouble is that 
> when one is suddenly  forced to give up such a dependency it leaves a 
> psychological mark. I'm telling you this not because I'm trying to excuse 
> my past but because you don't read as a troll or one of those hipocrites 
> that try to provoke me then get upset when i respond; that and i really 
> like you signatures. :). I've come a long way in the last three years but 
> i've still got a long way to go. Whether the others beleive me or not is 
> thier problem and they should deal with it, or not as they see fit. 
> However I shall ignore their taunts for my sake as much as anyones.


You tried this "oh, you're the only nice person amongst all these meanies" 
with janet, remember? Didn't work then, won't work now.

Jani

"Jani"  wrote in message 
news:g3jn8s$2vbn$1@energise.enta.net...
>
> "Flower of romance"  wrote in message 
> news:0eV6k.17893$7m7.4909@newsfe30.ams2...
>>
>> "Halla"  wrote in message 
>> news:rgvl54thtd44t36smkr91rcrm4vjddb4rv@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:31:16 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>  blethered:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>news:fdul54lb9s5ahc7loqfbp4172pf4s22r2r@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>>>  blethered:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>>>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>>
>>>>>>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.
>>>>>
>>>>> So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all.
>>>>
>>>>Old anger issues not so old after all. Forgive me.
>>>
>>> That depends what you do from now on, really.
>>
>> Do? well I just went on a bike ride. ;) If you're worried about me 
>> trolling then don't. That's not what I do and despite what people think, 
>> that's never what I do (well not since Igave up the booze over three 
>> years ago anyway) Before that was pretty much a blur anyway. The trouble 
>> is that when one is suddenly  forced to give up such a dependency it 
>> leaves a psychological mark. I'm telling you this not because I'm trying 
>> to excuse my past but because you don't read as a troll or one of those 
>> hipocrites that try to provoke me then get upset when i respond; that and 
>> i really like you signatures. :). I've come a long way in the last three 
>> years but i've still got a long way to go. Whether the others beleive me 
>> or not is thier problem and they should deal with it, or not as they see 
>> fit. However I shall ignore their taunts for my sake as much as anyones.
>
>
> You tried this "oh, you're the only nice person amongst all these meanies" 
> with janet, remember? Didn't work then, won't work now.

Don't even imagine that you know anything about me. You knew nothing about 
me "then" and you know nothing about me now other than what I've told you. 
If you don't beleive me then that's your problem and I can't be bothered 
with it.


>
> Jani

> "Jani"  wrote in message 
> news:g3jn8s$2vbn$1@energise.enta.net...
>>

You nearly got me but I made a promise to myself and I owe a courtesy to the 
rest of the group so.

*PLONK*

"trin"  wrote in message 
news:2654c3e4-479a-4f07-90dd-7e865b52c3d5@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Flower of romance wrote:
>> Jani wrote
>
>> > You tried this "oh, you're the only nice person amongst all these 
>> > meanies"
>> > with janet, remember? Didn't work then, won't work now.
>>
>> Don't even imagine that you know anything about me. You knew nothing 
>> about
>> me "then" and you know nothing about me now other than what I've told 
>> you.
>> If you don't beleive me then that's your problem and I can't be bothered
>> with it.
>
> LOL! Looks like Mrs Cake was right, as always. :>

And, weren't you told that you had to feed it and clean out its cage? Hmmm?

;-)

Jani

"Flower of romance"  wrote in message 
news:Z5f7k.86272$1B6.29356@newsfe21.ams2...
>
> "Jani"  wrote in message 
> news:g3jn8s$2vbn$1@energise.enta.net...
>>
>> "Flower of romance"  wrote in message 
>> news:0eV6k.17893$7m7.4909@newsfe30.ams2...
>>>
>>> "Halla"  wrote in message 
>>> news:rgvl54thtd44t36smkr91rcrm4vjddb4rv@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:31:16 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>>  blethered:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>>news:fdul54lb9s5ahc7loqfbp4172pf4s22r2r@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:21:46 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>>>>>>  blethered:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Halla"  wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:d8qi54lh3m7e70u1hg01ordu7eo4t4c4t9@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>>>>Sorry Halla. Didn't mean to spread this bad chemistry in public.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So don't. No one else hit 'send' for you, after all.
>>>>>
>>>>>Old anger issues not so old after all. Forgive me.
>>>>
>>>> That depends what you do from now on, really.
>>>
>>> Do? well I just went on a bike ride. ;) If you're worried about me 
>>> trolling then don't. That's not what I do and despite what people think, 
>>> that's never what I do (well not since Igave up the booze over three 
>>> years ago anyway) Before that was pretty much a blur anyway. The trouble 
>>> is that when one is suddenly  forced to give up such a dependency it 
>>> leaves a psychological mark. I'm telling you this not because I'm trying 
>>> to excuse my past but because you don't read as a troll or one of those 
>>> hipocrites that try to provoke me then get upset when i respond; that 
>>> and i really like you signatures. :). I've come a long way in the last 
>>> three years but i've still got a long way to go. Whether the others 
>>> beleive me or not is thier problem and they should deal with it, or not 
>>> as they see fit. However I shall ignore their taunts for my sake as much 
>>> as anyones.
>>
>>
>> You tried this "oh, you're the only nice person amongst all these 
>> meanies" with janet, remember? Didn't work then, won't work now.
>
> Don't even imagine that you know anything about me. You knew nothing about 
> me "then" and you know nothing about me now other than what I've told you. 
> If you don't beleive me then that's your problem and I can't be bothered 
> with it.

What do you want us to believe, poppet? You've told soooo many tales ....

Jani

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:11:25 +0100, "Jani" 
blethered:

>
>"Flower of romance"  wrote in message 
>news:0eV6k.17893$7m7.4909@newsfe30.ams2...
<snip>
>
>You tried this "oh, you're the only nice person amongst all these meanies" 
>with janet, remember? Didn't work then, won't work now.

Yeah well, anyone who tries to convince me I'm nice is on the wrong
tack anyway. I may have many undesirable qualities which, when added
up and viewed from a distance make me *appear* to be nice, but nice I
am *not*. :-)


-- 
"I have a hobby...I have the world's largest collection of sea shells. 
I keep it scattered on beaches all over the world. Maybe you've seen 
some of it... "

"Halla"  wrote in message 
news:4lqt54lp7nq4ml8lmb0mrjp7i2ad8gkrar@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:11:25 +0100, "Jani" 
> blethered:
>
>>
>>"Flower of romance"  wrote in message
>>news:0eV6k.17893$7m7.4909@newsfe30.ams2...
> <snip>
>>
>>You tried this "oh, you're the only nice person amongst all these meanies"
>>with janet, remember? Didn't work then, won't work now.
>
> Yeah well, anyone who tries to convince me I'm nice is on the wrong
> tack anyway. I may have many undesirable qualities which, when added
> up and viewed from a distance make me *appear* to be nice, but nice I
> am *not*. :-)

I never said i was nice. I said I am not the person I was. whether that is a 
good thing or bad things os for the fates to decide. ;) In truth I blow hot 
and cold a bit.

"trin"  wrote in message 
news:a9f4293f-289a-4de8-b43b-ddc2047fbbb2@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> Flower of romance wrote:
>
>> I never said i was nice. I said I am not the person I was. whether that 
>> is a
>> good thing or bad things os for the fates to decide. ;) In truth I blow 
>> hot
>> and cold a bit.
>
> Yeah, but you pretty much implied the collective "we" of URP are nice
> with your post about how we don't fight and stuff - we're not, we're
> just real people, with real niggles, just like the rest of the world
> (though not all of us always admit to the being people lark ;)).

Yeah but there are niggles ad there are niggles. The trouble is that lot's 
of people think that their niggles are worse than everyone elses. The truth 
is that everyone  has thier share of crap. And I didn't imply anything. I 
inferred that you were all "NICER", not "NICE" and that is because if you 
hunt around other newsgroups then you will see no end of bickering. Some are 
worse than other but it's all a testiment to people's intolerence for each 
other. This group is a lot friendlier and is a nice change from the gunge of 
usenet.
>
> Look, we can understand if you wanna be here, fine, we do to (want to
> be here I mean, that's why we keep being here), but if you're gonna be
> here, come in as who you are, instead of trying to be a different
> entity every time.

Different Entity? Trin there are two me's. The drunk me and the sober me. 
The sober me has been here (not in this newsgroup but around in general) for 
over three and a half years and I post as me. A man in completely the wrong 
side of thirty who's not particularly one thing or another; just me.

>You may as well 'cause it doesn't work out for you
> with being the different entity lark anyway, Mrs. Cake always gets her
> man.

Mrs Cake? You mean Jani?
She doesn't always get her man. She didn't get me at all becuse i 
practically told you her I was. She certainly doesn't know me at all and 
there's nothing special about me so maybe she got other people wrong too. I 
don't wish to bring her down but perhaps she judges too rashly. Hands up if 
you haven't been guilty of that in the past.

>Be proud of who you are, instead of trying to be someone nice and
> new every time, because it doesn't wash.

I'm not being nice, I'm not being new. I'm being me. Stone cold sober me.

>And if you piss us off and/or
> say something stupid, we'll call you on it, just like we call each
> other on anything that's stupid, or that pisses us off (go look
> through the archives, I've had plenty of bollockings for idiocy).

There's no shame in that. Just as long as you don't object when I do the 
same. That's not a dig. I just can't stand that kind of hipocrisy.

>If
> we do call you on stuff, don't get your back up and come up all
> defensive, learn from it, and talk about it, and ask WHY it pissed
> people off, or WHERE we think you're being stupid. Trust me, you can
> learn a lot from living in here.

Trin. For one then maybe you could learn from me too but remember that spam 
reply the my reply to spam? Are you seriously tellling me that that was the 
best way you could put it? or was it because of my past? Like I said I'm not 
here to piss anyone off. That's not what I do. There's more than enough of 
that shit going on outside here for my liking so if you have a problem with 
something i say then pick me up on it by all means and I'll do my best to 
resolve it and more than happy to do so but don't think that my past makes 
me an open target or I will bite back (or maybe just ignore you) and I don't 
want to do either. In my drunken days I did a lot worse irl than i could 
have possible done to anyone on here (unless i met you IRL of course ) The 
past is gone and i'd like it to stay gone.  Do me that one favour of taking 
me how you see me now.

Cheers.

> --
> trin

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:26:44 +0100, "Flower of romance"
 wrote:

>The 
>past is gone and i'd like it to stay gone.  Do me that one favour of taking 
>me how you see me now.

I see someone who talks a lot about the past that they say is gone.
-- 
Lady Nina
"I'm sorry I can't join in anymore, I've been let down too many times
before"

"Lady Nina"  wrote in message 
news:jf35749ib7cmanuorlduvfjoej9d50tsc3@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:26:44 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>  wrote:
>
>>The
>>past is gone and i'd like it to stay gone.  Do me that one favour of 
>>taking
>>me how you see me now.
>
> I see someone who talks a lot about the past that they say is gone.

So you decided how to spend your evening.
> -- 
> Lady Nina
> "I'm sorry I can't join in anymore, I've been let down too many times
> before"