With 1280 width set to become the new standard - its now possible to 
have 2 websites on the one page .

(if a width of 600 is used for both websites)

On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:48:52 -0000, Krustov  wrote:

>With 1280 width set to become the new standard - its now possible to 
>have 2 websites on the one page .
>
>(if a width of 600 is used for both websites)

Restrict the height of a website and have 4 websites on one page!
Here's an even better idea, make each website just one pixel high.
More dotty.


-- 
Regards, Paul Herber, Sandrila Ltd.  http://www.sandrila.co.uk/

"Paul Herber"  wrote in 
message 
news:sbnnq4tdbfij2lk9tauvkvfehppdeisjg7@news.gradwell.net...
: On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:48:52 -0000, Krustov  
wrote:
:
: >With 1280 width set to become the new standard - its now 
possible to
: >have 2 websites on the one page .
: >
: >(if a width of 600 is used for both websites)
:
: Restrict the height of a website and have 4 websites on one 
page!
: Here's an even better idea, make each website just one pixel 
high.
: More dotty.
:

Restrict the width and height you could have 8 or 10 on the same 
page, what ever the size of screen! Remember the reason for a web 
page, to get your information or message across, of course if one 
is more intend in driving your 'customer' away just top be the 
wiz-kid web shite *designer* feel free Krusty!
-- 
Wikipedia: the Internet equivalent of
Hyde Park and 'speakers corner'...
Sorry, mail to this address goes unread.
Please reply via group.

On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:24:45 +0000, Paul Herber
 wrote in
:

>Restrict the height of a website and have 4 websites on one page!
>Here's an even better idea, make each website just one pixel high.
>More dotty.

Make it 1000x1000 pixels, sell links at $1 per pixel and make
$1,000,000!

-- 
Owen Rees
[one of] my preferred email address[es] and more stuff can be
found at <http://www.users.waitrose.com/~owenrees/index.html>

"Owen Rees"  wrote in message 
news:1ghoq4lk0bd3enucdpea075293ijq1hpo5@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:24:45 +0000, Paul Herber
>  wrote in
> :
>
>>Restrict the height of a website and have 4 websites on one page!
>>Here's an even better idea, make each website just one pixel high.
>>More dotty.
>
> Make it 1000x1000 pixels, sell links at $1 per pixel and make
> $1,000,000!
>
> -- 
> Owen Rees
> [one of] my preferred email address[es] and more stuff can be
> found at <http://www.users.waitrose.com/~owenrees/index.html>

Hey, but he just said 1280 is the new standard AND this is UK net web 
authoring so that's £1,310,720 = about $2m. Or maybe he could offer a 
"credit crunch special" and sell the links at 50 cents each and still make a 
cool mill.

--
+mrcakey
www.everythingthatswrongwiththeworld.com

"Owen Rees"  wrote in message 
news:1ghoq4lk0bd3enucdpea075293ijq1hpo5@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:24:45 +0000, Paul Herber
>  wrote in
> :
>
>>Restrict the height of a website and have 4 websites on one page!
>>Here's an even better idea, make each website just one pixel high.
>>More dotty.
>
> Make it 1000x1000 pixels, sell links at $1 per pixel and make
> $1,000,000!

iframes at 1 square pixel, that sounds familiar.

-dE|_---

Take a look at the source of http://www.bramptons.net/

Looks like load of separate pages stitched together.  Loads of heads
bodies and doctypes.

Can't be right can it?  Or is that how aspx pages work?
-- 
Geoff Berrow  0110001001101100010000000110
001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
http://slipperyhill.co.uk - http://4theweb.co.uk

Geoff Berrow wrote:
> Take a look at the source of http://www.bramptons.net/
> 
> Looks like load of separate pages stitched together.  Loads of heads
> bodies and doctypes.
> 
> Can't be right can it?  Or is that how aspx pages work?

I can only assume you are trolling since it's a trivial issue to 
download Visual Studio Express and see for yourself. And surely meant 
'how VS or ASP.NET work'? ASPX is just another extension that certain 
web servers know to process in a different way.

The meta tags indicate v7.1 = Visual Studio 2003. It's been a while 
since I've used it, but I don't remember it injecting all that meta-crap 
into my code. I wonder if it was created in some other tool from that era?

Apart from manually entering crap (which is a platform-agnostic 
technique!), I don't actually know how they achieved this level of 
carnage. I suppose, at certain level, I should be impressed. And it's a 
testament to the resilience of modern browsers that it renders reasonably.

In mitigation, they have at least used a DOCTYPE; ok, several, all 
Transitional, and different ones throughout the page, but they have a 
DOCTYPE nevertheless.

How did you come across it?

CJM

<uk.net.web.authoring>
<CJM>
<Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:39:59 +0000>


> How did you come across it?
> 

Probably the usual type of couple of pumps and a squirt :-))


-- 
www.cannabiswindow.co.uk/guestbook_latest_entrys.php

"Krustov"  wrote in message 
news:MPG.24208f5cd6ea00598bd25@news.newsreader.com...
: <uk.net.web.authoring>
: <CJM>
: <Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:39:59 +0000>
: 
:
: > How did you come across it?
: >
:
: Probably the usual type of couple of pumps and a squirt :-))
:

Not everyone is a hair-trigger like you Krusty, one of the 
benefits of loosing that first flush of youth, your stamina 
improves!
-- 
Wikipedia: the Internet equivalent of
Hyde Park and 'speakers corner'...
Sorry, mail to this address goes unread.
Please reply via group.

Jerry wrote:
> "Krustov"  wrote in message 
> :
> : > How did you come across it?
> : >
> :
> : Probably the usual type of couple of pumps and a squirt :-))
> :
> 
> Not everyone is a hair-trigger like you Krusty, one of the 
> benefits of loosing that first flush of youth, your stamina 
> improves!

OK, it wasn't the best thread we've ever had, but it's definitely head 
south now...

In fact, I feel tainted...

PS. It ain't anything to do with extra stamina; as the wife starts to 
look more and more like her mother, it becomes harder to imagine you are 
shacked up with Kate Beckinsdale.

Message-ID:  from CJM contained the
following:

>Geoff Berrow wrote:
>> Take a look at the source of http://www.bramptons.net/
>> 
>> Looks like load of separate pages stitched together.  Loads of heads
>> bodies and doctypes.
>> 
>> Can't be right can it?  Or is that how aspx pages work?
>
>I can only assume you are trolling since it's a trivial issue to 
>download Visual Studio Express and see for yourself. 

I'm just curious, I'm not curious enough to do /that/...

>And surely meant 
>'how VS or ASP.NET work'? ASPX is just another extension that certain 
>web servers know to process in a different way.

No, I wondered whether aspx meant that there was some asynchronous stuff
going on and that's why it was in so many sections.

>
>The meta tags indicate v7.1 = Visual Studio 2003. It's been a while 
>since I've used it, but I don't remember it injecting all that meta-crap 
>into my code. I wonder if it was created in some other tool from that era?

I may be able to find out.
>
>Apart from manually entering crap (which is a platform-agnostic 
>technique!), I don't actually know how they achieved this level of 
>carnage. I suppose, at certain level, I should be impressed. And it's a 
>testament to the resilience of modern browsers that it renders reasonably.

Yes that was my view.  I was amazed it worked at all.

>In mitigation, they have at least used a DOCTYPE; ok, several, all 
>Transitional, and different ones throughout the page, but they have a 
>DOCTYPE nevertheless.
>
>How did you come across it?

It's my accountant's website.  I noticed he'd changed it and just took a
peek at the code (like you do).  I just wanted to make sure I had my
facts straight before I told him how potentially broken it was.

Thanks for looking.

-- 
Geoff Berrow  0110001001101100010000000110
001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
http://slipperyhill.co.uk - http://4theweb.co.uk

On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:42:01 +0000, CJM 
wrote:


>PS. It ain't anything to do with extra stamina; as the wife starts to 
>look more and more like her mother, it becomes harder to imagine you are 
>shacked up with Kate Beckinsdale.
When you get too bored, try imagining Richard Beckinsale in a frock
and stockings, that approach works for some  ...

Geoff Berrow wrote:
> 
> I'm just curious, I'm not curious enough to do /that/...
> 

Obviously you have your own preferred development tools, but there is 
actually not much wrong with VWD. You could do worse.

>> And surely meant 
>> 'how VS or ASP.NET work'? ASPX is just another extension that certain 
>> web servers know to process in a different way.
> 
> No, I wondered whether aspx meant that there was some asynchronous stuff
> going on and that's why it was in so many sections.
> 

By default, if the page has an ASPX extension is will be processed by 
IIS an ASP.NET page, which works in exactly the same way that ASP 
Classic, PHP and many others work. The engine looks for inline code to 
be pre-processed (or possibly a 'code-behind' page in the case of 
ASP.NET) and does the necessary.

I'm guessing that the dev has used standard #INCLUDEs to pull several 
files together, but I can't be sure. It's rather bizarre.

> 
> It's my accountant's website.  I noticed he'd changed it and just took a
> peek at the code (like you do).  I just wanted to make sure I had my
> facts straight before I told him how potentially broken it was.
> 

Cool. It should be a nice little earner for you, given all it's quirks! 
Just make sure you sign him up to the right contract, and make sure he 
doesn't recoup his costs through your accounting charges! You know how 
'shrewd' these accountants are.

"Geoff Berrow"  wrote in message 
news:dnkcr4ltdi9jq4g97hvbg623kknu65jrb2@4ax.com...
> Take a look at the source of http://www.bramptons.net/
>
> Looks like load of separate pages stitched together.  Loads of heads
> bodies and doctypes.
>
> Can't be right can it?  Or is that how aspx pages work?
> -- 
> Geoff Berrow  0110001001101100010000000110
> 001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
> 100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
> http://slipperyhill.co.uk - http://4theweb.co.uk

Nothing to do with aspx, its just a piss poor visual design.

AC