Message-ID: <Ulaml.5217$de5.2421@newsfe10.ams2> from dE|_ contained the
following:

>I'm in with the screen capture side of the argument and I'm very good with 
>getting visual watermarks out with the clone stamp tool so a search engine 
>with an eye is the only guardian left.

Try this one.  Tough work cloning this out.

http://www.4theweb.co.uk/watermark/

-- 
Geoff Berrow  0110001001101100010000000110
001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
http://slipperyhill.co.uk - http://4theweb.co.uk

"Geoff Berrow" wrote in message 
news:jsujp4h418nemaq67501aiuopbieojmeqm@4ax.com...
> Message-ID: <Ulaml.5217$de5.2421@newsfe10.ams2> from dE|_ contained the
> following:
>
>>I'm in with the screen capture side of the argument and I'm very good with
>>getting visual watermarks out with the clone stamp tool so a search engine
>>with an eye is the only guardian left.
>
> Try this one.  Tough work cloning this out.
>
> http://www.4theweb.co.uk/watermark/

True, but when artists want to display their work they dont splat proofs 
that big over it as it hides too much. I'm not invincible, just well 
practiced before I got an account with istock.

-dE|_---