Much better - but it still has that highly annoying popup icon when you 
hightlight some text .

Giving users the option to disable it must be out of the fucking 
question then eh! .

Krustov wrote:
> Much better - but it still has that highly annoying popup icon when you 
> hightlight some text .
> 
> Giving users the option to disable it must be out of the fucking 
> question then eh! .

Simple answer: don't use Micro$oft Internet Exploder.

If I didn't have to test in various browsers I'd never use IE at all.

As for Microsoft giving its customers options - bwhahahahahaaaa!

<uk.net.web.authoring>
<>
<Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:35:57 +0100>
<48b7ed3e$0$26090$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>

> > Much better - but it still has that highly annoying popup icon when you 
> > hightlight some text .
> > 
> > Giving users the option to disable it must be out of the fucking 
> > question then eh! .
> 
> Simple answer: don't use Micro$oft Internet Exploder.
> 

Actually i use Opera a lot of the time these days for general sufting 
and stuff as i've never been very keen on fartfox .


-- 
www.phpguestbook.co.uk/phpgb
(the best php guestbook on planet earth)

"Krustov"  wrote in message 
news:MPG.2321f0afc0bcf8a98b901@news.newsreader.com...
> Much better - but it still has that highly annoying popup icon when you
> hightlight some text .
>
> Giving users the option to disable it must be out of the fucking
> question then eh! .
>

My biggest issue with beta1 was it's massive JS problems. Browsing Facebook 
was like walking broken floorboards on methadone.

How is beta2 doing with JS now? I won't install it.

-dE|_---

dE|_ wrote:

> "Krustov"  wrote in message
> news:MPG.2321f0afc0bcf8a98b901@news.newsreader.com...
> > Much better - but it still has that highly annoying popup icon when you
> > hightlight some text .
> >
> > Giving users the option to disable it must be out of the fucking
> > question then eh! .
> >
>
> My biggest issue with beta1 was it's massive JS problems. Browsing Facebook
> was like walking broken floorboards on methadone.
>
> How is beta2 doing with JS now? I won't install it.
>
Hi Del.
I just read an email (came through my site).
New client said something like:
We want a more pro looking site.
I had a look at the current site. Then I had a look at the source
code.
Let me just say that I got another Jim Bean can from the fridge.
Yes, the source was *THAT BAD*!
But anyhow, I have just installed IE7 on this PC and it is shit
enough.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesignonline.org

<uk.net.web.authoring>
<dE|_>
<Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:13:24 +0100>
<U6Wtk.148840$gM4.71631@newsfe25.ams2>

> How is beta2 doing with JS now? I won't install it.
> 

If your not going to install it - then isnt saying what JS is like now 
all rather pointless and futile .


-- 
www.phpguestbook.co.uk/phpgb
(the best php guestbook on planet earth)

In uk.net.web.authoring message <MPG.2322047ffcd2c84398b904@news.newsrea
der.com>, Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:05:55, Krustov  posted:
>
>Actually i use Opera a lot of the time these days for general sufting
>and stuff as i've never been very keen on fartfox .
>

With Opera, beware of any code from the US which depends on a given
date/time.  Opera   new Date(string)   knows nothing of EST, EDT, etc.;
and treats the numbers as browser local time.  That is particularly
foolish when the actual event does not occur in the USA, but up to
billions of miles away.

-- 
 (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK.    ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk     Turnpike v6.05.
 Web  <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
 PAS EXE etc : <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/> - see 00index.htm
 Dates - miscdate.htm moredate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc.

"Krustov" wrote...
> <uk.net.web.authoring>
> <dE|_>
> <Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:13:24 +0100>
> <U6Wtk.148840$gM4.71631@newsfe25.ams2>
>
>> How is beta2 doing with JS now? I won't install it.
>>
>
> If your not going to install it - then isnt saying what JS is like now
> all rather pointless and futile .

Just asking. Take a pill.

-dE|_---

What websites monitor current events in other galaxies then ?

Dr J R Stockton wrote:
That is particularly  foolish when the actual event does not occur in 
the USA, but up to billions of miles away.

In uk.net.web.authoring message ,
Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:42:29, Steve Y  posted:
>What websites monitor current events in other galaxies then ?
>
>Dr J R Stockton wrote:
>That is particularly  foolish when the actual event does not occur in
>the USA, but up to billions of miles away.

You show a remarkable lack of knowledge of the Solar System and Galaxy
in which you live; in particular of their sizes.
<http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/newhorizons/main/index.html> shows
the Opera fault.

Please read FYI28.

-- 
 (c) John Stockton, nr London UK. replyYYWW merlyn demon co uk Turnpike 6.05.
 Web <URL:http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/tsfaq.html> -> Timo Salmi: Usenet Q&A.
 Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/news-use.htm> :  about usage of News.
 No Encoding. Quotes precede replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Mail no News.