smart ftp
Used it for years and upgraded to the latest version today .
But the (so called) new improvements are awful and its now become time
to uninstall and dump the app .
Having now downloaded and installed a couple of other freeware ftp apps
it looks like coffeecup ftp is going to be the winner .
(didnt even try core ftp as the last time i tried it - the splash screen
had one of those highly annoying 5-10 second countdown timers that
stopped the app from firing up until it counted down to zero)
date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:25:23 +0100
author: Krustov
|
Re: smart ftp
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:25:23 +0100, Krustov wrote:
> Having now downloaded and installed a couple of other freeware ftp apps
> it looks like coffeecup ftp is going to be the winner .
Did you try sitecopy? I use it for all routine site updates, and only
very rarely use any kind of interactive ftp.
--
Anahata
anahata@treewind.co.uk ==//== 01638 720444
http://www.treewind.co.uk ==//== http://www.myspace.com/maryanahata
date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:29:48 -0500
author: anahata
|
Re: smart ftp
Krustov wrote:
> Used it for years and upgraded to the latest version today .
>
> But the (so called) new improvements are awful and its now become time
> to uninstall and dump the app .
Have you tried Filezilla?
date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:36:10 +0100
author: treadmill-- with the great taste of fish nope
|
Re: smart ftp
<uk.net.web.authoring>
<anahata>
<Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:29:48 -0500>
<2OCdnQI389rBLsLV4p2dnAA@posted.plusnet>
> > Having now downloaded and installed a couple of other freeware ftp apps
> > it looks like coffeecup ftp is going to be the winner .
>
> Did you try sitecopy? I use it for all routine site updates, and only
> very rarely use any kind of interactive ftp.
>
No - but from your brief desctiption of it i assume its some sort of
folder/file sync app that will upload any new or changed files .
If so then in some cases i wouldnt want to upload scripts and stuff that
are half finished and/or still being worked on .
--
www.krustov.co.uk
date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:36:28 +0100
author: Krustov
|
Re: smart ftp
In message , Krustov
writes
>Used it for years and upgraded to the latest version today .
>
>But the (so called) new improvements are awful and its now become time
>to uninstall and dump the app .
Why not just stick with the old version if that did what you wanted?
>Having now downloaded and installed a couple of other freeware ftp apps
>it looks like coffeecup ftp is going to be the winner .
Did you try FileZilla?
--
Dominic Sexton
date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:33:14 +0100
author: Dominic Sexton {da-sep03}@dscs.demon.co.uk
|
Re: smart ftp
<uk.net.web.authoring>
<Dominic Sexton>
<Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:33:14 +0100>
<+u8X1bO6I8XIFwmb@nospam.demon.co.uk>
> Why not just stick with the old version if that did what you wanted?
>
Because after x amount of time smart ftp will close down just after the
splash screen and wont fire up until you download and install the latest
version .
--
www.krustov.co.uk
date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:07:20 +0100
author: Krustov
|
Re: smart ftp
In message , Krustov
writes
><uk.net.web.authoring>
><Dominic Sexton>
><Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:33:14 +0100>
><+u8X1bO6I8XIFwmb@nospam.demon.co.uk>
>
>> Why not just stick with the old version if that did what you wanted?
>>
>
>Because after x amount of time smart ftp will close down just after the
>splash screen and wont fire up until you download and install the latest
>version .
I'm still happily using 2.5 here and have not 'upgraded' in a long time.
Mine is licensed so perhaps that makes a difference.
--
Dominic Sexton
date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:36:08 +0100
author: Dominic Sexton {da-sep03}@dscs.demon.co.uk
|
Re: smart ftp
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:36:28 +0100, Krustov wrote:
> <uk.net.web.authoring>
> <anahata>
> <Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:29:48 -0500>
> <2OCdnQI389rBLsLV4p2dnAA@posted.plusnet>
>
>> > Having now downloaded and installed a couple of other freeware ftp
>> > apps it looks like coffeecup ftp is going to be the winner .
>>
>> Did you try sitecopy? I use it for all routine site updates, and only
>> very rarely use any kind of interactive ftp.
>>
>>
> No - but from your brief desctiption of it i assume its some sort of
> folder/file sync app that will upload any new or changed files .
>
> If so then in some cases i wouldnt want to upload scripts and stuff that
> are half finished and/or still being worked on .
Yes, that's exactly what it is, and if you have half-finished scripts
you'd have to work round that problem. Sitecopy can be configured to
exclude files by name or wildcard pattern, so you might be able to
configure a workable system that way.
--
Anahata
anahata@treewind.co.uk ==//== 01638 720444
http://www.treewind.co.uk ==//== http://www.myspace.com/maryanahata
date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:45:02 -0500
author: anahata
|