Evening

Just doing a bit of tidying ready for a meeting tomorrow.  The client has
said that the pagination numbers on the page below 'get cut off'.  I didn't
check at the time but it looks fine on my Mac on FF.

http://test.georgekidner.com/auctioncalender

I'd be grateful if someone could have a look and maybe stick a screen grab
online.

Cheers

Andy

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:38:54 +0100, Andy Jacobs wrote:
> Just doing a bit of tidying ready for a meeting tomorrow.  The client has
> said that the pagination numbers on the page below 'get cut off'.  I didn't
> check at the time but it looks fine on my Mac on FF.
> 
> http://test.georgekidner.com/auctioncalender


Pagination numbers present and looking fine for me on Windows in IE6, IE7,
FF2, Opera 9 and Safari 3.


-- 
Safalra (Stephen Morley)

The 'white-space' Property In CSS:
http://www.safalra.com/web-design/html-and-css/white-space-property/

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:38:54 +0100, Andy Jacobs
 wrote:

>Evening
>
>Just doing a bit of tidying ready for a meeting tomorrow.  The client has
>said that the pagination numbers on the page below 'get cut off'.  I didn't
>check at the time but it looks fine on my Mac on FF.
>
>http://test.georgekidner.com/auctioncalender
>
>I'd be grateful if someone could have a look and maybe stick a screen grab
>online.

The pagination numbers look fine in FF, IE6 and Opera but the 
"For more information contact us:" section is completely wrong in IE.

http://www.pherber.com/image1.jpg


-- 
Regards, Paul Herber, Sandrila Ltd.
http://www.sandrila.co.uk/              http://www.pherber.com/

On 15/6/08 9:53 pm, in article 1q98dscx0rpxq.z04594cq2tza.dlg@40tude.net,
"Safalra (Stephen Morley)"  wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:38:54 +0100, Andy Jacobs wrote:
>> Just doing a bit of tidying ready for a meeting tomorrow.  The client has
>> said that the pagination numbers on the page below 'get cut off'.  I didn't
>> check at the time but it looks fine on my Mac on FF.
>> 
>> http://test.georgekidner.com/auctioncalender
> 
> 
> Pagination numbers present and looking fine for me on Windows in IE6, IE7,
> FF2, Opera 9 and Safari 3.
> 

Cheers for that.

A

On 15/6/08 9:55 pm, in article
840b54t8gvu3r5lgdp560q9kqnbd7dcbs4@news.gradwell.net, "Paul Herber"
 wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:38:54 +0100, Andy Jacobs
>  wrote:
> 
>> Evening
>> 
>> Just doing a bit of tidying ready for a meeting tomorrow.  The client has
>> said that the pagination numbers on the page below 'get cut off'.  I didn't
>> check at the time but it looks fine on my Mac on FF.
>> 
>> http://test.georgekidner.com/auctioncalender
>> 
>> I'd be grateful if someone could have a look and maybe stick a screen grab
>> online.
> 
> The pagination numbers look fine in FF, IE6 and Opera but the
> "For more information contact us:" section is completely wrong in IE.
> 
> http://www.pherber.com/image1.jpg
> 

Thanks Paul.  I'll get that checked.

A

Andy Jacobs wrote:

> Evening
>
> Just doing a bit of tidying ready for a meeting tomorrow.  The client has
> said that the pagination numbers on the page below 'get cut off'.  I didn't
> check at the time but it looks fine on my Mac on FF.
>
> http://test.georgekidner.com/auctioncalender
>
> I'd be grateful if someone could have a look and maybe stick a screen grab
> online.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
Andy.
Your test page has some sirious problems. In Firefox try increasing
the font size twice and see what happens. I do believe I have
mentioned these issues with your sites before. While your sites do
look good a lot of them do have these function tye issues.
Which is part of the reason my sites are designed the way they are. It
is easier for accessibility if the design is more simple. However I
can design better looking sites if I need to.
Oh yeah take a look at the portfolio at maxdesign.com.au (they have
some good example of what can be done) I have been looking at them
myself. It is kind of hard this accessible thing cause on one hand you
want your sites to look good but on the other you are a bit limited in
what you can do.

--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesignonline.org

On 17/6/08 4:09 pm, in article
dd3602e4-4d33-4774-8b8a-c3d9f59cf501@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com,
"Chaddy2222"  wrote:

> 
> 
> Andy Jacobs wrote:
> 
>> Evening
>> 
>> Just doing a bit of tidying ready for a meeting tomorrow.  The client has
>> said that the pagination numbers on the page below 'get cut off'.  I didn't
>> check at the time but it looks fine on my Mac on FF.
>> 
>> http://test.georgekidner.com/auctioncalender
>> 
>> I'd be grateful if someone could have a look and maybe stick a screen grab
>> online.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Andy
> Andy.
> Your test page has some sirious problems. In Firefox try increasing
> the font size twice and see what happens. I do believe I have
> mentioned these issues with your sites before. While your sites do
> look good a lot of them do have these function tye issues.

I see what you mean.  *Normally, I would say that there is going to be a
compromise between satisfying the client, who WILL favour design, and
accessibility

> Which is part of the reason my sites are designed the way they are. It
> is easier for accessibility if the design is more simple. However I
> can design better looking sites if I need to.

That's a bit of a straw man.  I could fix the accessibility problems with my
sites if I needed to.  The whole point about the DDA is that you need to
make REASONABLE steps to ensure that your goods/services/information, etc,
are accessible to all.  Failing that, you need to demonstrate that you have
a mechanism in place if it can be demonstrated that you're excluding a
particular group of people.

My argument would be that people can always turn stylesheets off.

> Oh yeah take a look at the portfolio at maxdesign.com.au

<snip>

*That's my caveat.  After seeing this site, I'm more than happy to continue
the learning process.

-- 
Andy Jacobs
http://www.redcatmedia.co.uk

Andy Jacobs wrote:

> On 17/6/08 4:09 pm, in article
> dd3602e4-4d33-4774-8b8a-c3d9f59cf501@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com,
> "Chaddy2222"  wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Andy Jacobs wrote:
> >
> >> Evening
> >>
> >> Just doing a bit of tidying ready for a meeting tomorrow.  The client has
> >> said that the pagination numbers on the page below 'get cut off'.  I didn't
> >> check at the time but it looks fine on my Mac on FF.
> >>
> >> http://test.georgekidner.com/auctioncalender
> >>
> >> I'd be grateful if someone could have a look and maybe stick a screen grab
> >> online.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Andy
> > Andy.
> > Your test page has some sirious problems. In Firefox try increasing
> > the font size twice and see what happens. I do believe I have
> > mentioned these issues with your sites before. While your sites do
> > look good a lot of them do have these function tye issues.
>
> I see what you mean.  *Normally, I would say that there is going to be a
> compromise between satisfying the client, who WILL favour design, and
> accessibility
>
> > Which is part of the reason my sites are designed the way they are. It
> > is easier for accessibility if the design is more simple. However I
> > can design better looking sites if I need to.
>
> That's a bit of a straw man.  I could fix the accessibility problems with my
> sites if I needed to.  The whole point about the DDA is that you need to
> make REASONABLE steps to ensure that your goods/services/information, etc,
> are accessible to all.  Failing that, you need to demonstrate that you have
> a mechanism in place if it can be demonstrated that you're excluding a
> particular group of people.
Yes I am aware of all this. I was on about the visual / graphic design
of my site. I was saying that keeping the design simple makes it
easier for such accessibility to be automaticly included in a site.
Rather then make the site look good at a particular resolution as a
lot of designers tend to do.

>
> My argument would be that people can always turn stylesheets off.
>
True, but you really should try to not have people do that as it will
mess up your branding *obviously all that would depend on your market
and target audience.

> > Oh yeah take a look at the portfolio at maxdesign.com.au
>
> <snip>
>
> *That's my caveat.  After seeing this site, I'm more than happy to continue
> the learning process.
>
That is a good thing to do.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesignonline.org