|
|
|
date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:12:19 +0000,
group: uk.net.web.authoring
back
Seeking lots of "click here"s
I want a page with lots of "click here" links on it, to use as an
example.
Any suggestions?
Daniele
date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:12:19 +0000
author: (D.M. Procida)
|
Re: Seeking lots of "click here"s
<uk.net.web.authoring>
<D.M. Procida>
<Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:12:19 +0000>
<1iby7mv.1bbthm61gq4g9dN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>
> I want a page with lots of "click here" links on it, to use as an
> example.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
Yes .
You learn how to use the google search engine instead of asking others
to do your work for you and serve it up on a gold rimmed plate .
--
www.krustov.co.uk
date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:51:56 -0000
author: Krustov
|
Re: Seeking lots of "click here"s
On 7/2/08 4:12 pm, in article
1iby7mv.1bbthm61gq4g9dN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk, "D.M.
Procida" wrote:
> I want a page with lots of "click here" links on it, to use as an
> example.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Daniele
I guess you want to demonstrate the inaccessibility of inappropriate link
text?
Not "click here" but "more information". Will that do:
http://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp
I followed our resident tosser's advice and it actually worked! That's not
meant to be a reflection on you asking the question, btw.
--
Andy Jacobs
http://www.redcatmedia.co.uk
date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:20:51 +0000
author: Andy Jacobs
|
Re: Seeking lots of "click here"s
Andy Jacobs wrote:
> > I want a page with lots of "click here" links on it, to use as an
> > example.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> I guess you want to demonstrate the inaccessibility of inappropriate link
> text?
Indeed. I'm trying to find a page which demonstrates how unhelpful they
are, but it's such a difficult term to search for. The demonstration
really needs several "click here"s in succession, so I can show how a
screen reader would present the list of links in the page, i.e:
click here
click here
click here
click here
click here
click here
click here
> Not "click here" but "more information". Will that do:
I think it really has to be "click here", not least for the verb "click"
which fails to apply to every user who doesn't click.
Daniele
date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:28:25 +0000
author: (D.M. Procida)
|
Re: Seeking lots of "click here"s
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:28:25 +0000,
real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M. Procida) wrote in
<1ibydrd.1vwjptnmgribwN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>:
>Indeed. I'm trying to find a page which demonstrates how unhelpful they
>are, but it's such a difficult term to search for. The demonstration
>really needs several "click here"s in succession, so I can show how a
>screen reader would present the list of links in the page, i.e:
>
> click here
> click here
> click here
> click here
> click here
> click here
> click here
Take a look at <http://images.ed4.net/images/htdocs/addressbook/>; it's
not exactly like that but it may be a bit nearer what you are looking
for.
--
Owen Rees
[one of] my preferred email address[es] and more stuff can be
found at <http://www.users.waitrose.com/~owenrees/index.html>
date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:46:51 +0000
author: Owen Rees
|
Re: Seeking lots of "click here"s
Owen Rees wrote:
> Take a look at <http://images.ed4.net/images/htdocs/addressbook/>; it's
> not exactly like that but it may be a bit nearer what you are looking
> for.
It's perfect, thanks.
Daniele
date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:10:26 +0000
author: (D.M. Procida)
|
Re: Seeking lots of "click here"s
On 7/2/08 6:28 pm, in article
1ibydrd.1vwjptnmgribwN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk, "D.M.
Procida" wrote:
> I think it really has to be "click here", not least for the verb "click"
> which fails to apply to every user who doesn't click.
But that's just language, surely. You'd still say to a blind person "Do you
see what I mean", you'd probably ask someone in a wheel chair if they want
to go for a walk.
Personally, I think you're right but I don't think it has anything to do
with accessibility. The whole point is that you don't instruct people at
all. Open a book and look at the index. It doesn't say:
Accessibility Turn to page 22
It just says
Accessibility 22
Obviously, the word Accessibility becomes the frame of reference, so that
should become the word associated with the link whether a person is using a
mouse of some other form of navigation.
--
Andy Jacobs
http://www.redcatmedia.co.uk
date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:37:12 +0000
author: Andy Jacobs
|
Re: Seeking lots of "click here"s
On Feb 9, 11:37 pm, Andy Jacobs wrote:
> On 7/2/08 6:28 pm, in article
> 1ibydrd.1vwjptnmgribwN%real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk, "D.M.> Procida" wrote:
> > I think it really has to be "click here", not least for the verb "click"> > which fails to apply to every user who doesn't click.
>
> But that's just language, surely. You'd still say to a blind person "Do you
> see what I mean", you'd probably ask someone in a wheel chair if they want> to go for a walk.
>
> Personally, I think you're right but I don't think it has anything to do
> with accessibility. The whole point is that you don't instruct people at
> all. Open a book and look at the index. It doesn't say:
>
> Accessibility Turn to page 22
>
> It just says
>
> Accessibility 22
>
> Obviously, the word Accessibility becomes the frame of reference, so that
> should become the word associated with the link whether a person is using a
> mouse or some other form of navigation.
Yes, I agree with this.
Maybe a combo of words is what is required such as "click here for
details of new products".
Oh and I have known of us blind people to ask each other "did you
watch such and such movie".
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesignonline.org
date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:27:03 -0800 (PST)
author: Chaddy2222
|
|
|