On Jan 6, 3:18 pm, Jerry Stuckle  wrote:
> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:43:32 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> >  wrote:
>
> >> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:54:25 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> >>>  wrote:
>
> >>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:18:24 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> >>>>>  wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:42:45 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-bai...@no.where>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On 3 Jan 2008 18:40:30 GMT, John Bokma  wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> Andy Jacobs  wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Let's say I post the following:
> >>>>>>>>> Let's say that next time you do so on purpose I (and probably several
> >>>>>>>>> others) /will/ report it as spam. You're quite the hypocrite with your
> >>>>>>>>> nos...@redcatgroup.co.uk.
>
> >>>>>>>>> In short: foad, thank you.
> >>>>>>>> D'oh! Sorry John, but I don't recollect the election where you won the
> >>>>>>>> right to dictate what gets posted here.
> >>>>>>> It's off charter in at least one of the comp groups.  Do you care? Bet
> >>>>>>> not.
>
> >>>>>>> [snip advert]
>
> >>>>>>>> Is that spam?
> >>>>>>> Advertisements aren't always spam.  Now, if you were to ask if it were
> >>>>>>> an asanine thing to do, the answer would be yes.  Do you care?  Bet
> >>>>>>> not.
> >>>>>> Forget Master Baiter.  He's a troll who would love to see a.w.w. go to
> >>>>>> the spammers.
>
> >>>>> Your post is off topic in comp.lang.php as well, Jerry.  The least you
> >>>>> could do is drop it in the crosspost.  When you don't, you're just as
> >>>>> bad as him.
> >>>> Sorry, Gary,
> >>> Liar.
>
> >>>> I just wanted to let everyone where he crossposted be aware
> >>>> that he is a known troll.
> >>> All you're doing is showing yourself to be the fool.  I, for one, know
> >>> how to ignore him.  You're STILL crossposting so you're not at all
> >>> sorry.
> >> Sorry, Gary,
>
> > Liar.
>
> >> I have the right to defend myself, also.  If you don't like
> >> it, you can ignore the thread.
>
> > Same thing for you.  You can ignore the posts you don't like instead
> > of calling them spam to try to silence that which you do not like to
> > read.  
>
> I will call spam what it is.
You'll call spam what you like and you call legal what you want as
well,
and you're obliviously wrong in both accounts.