On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:29:03 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>RafaMinu wrote:
>> On Jan 6, 5:50 am, Jerry Stuckle  wrote:
>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:58:48 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:21:20 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-bai...@no.where>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In  on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nos...@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it.  Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>>>>> Fine.  I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>> Right.  Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>>>>> There is.  The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup.  And the FAQs for
>>>>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable.  Charters in unmoderated
>>>>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable.  Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>>>>> That's funny.  I've gotten quite a few hosting of accounts canceled
>>>>>>> because I've reported spam.
>>>>>> Only if it's real spam.  What you're calling spam isn't.  There are
>>>>>> very specific rules.  
>>>>> And according to the FAQ's in a.w.w, it is spam.
>>>> A FAQ is only a list of frequently asked questions, Jerry. It is no
>>>> way enforceable and can't change the meaning of the word.  >> They're
>>>> called alt. for a reason.  
>>> Sorry, you 're about 10 years behind the curve.
>>>
>>>>> Gee, it's the good ones who cancel accounts because I show them the
>>>>> spam.
>>>> Nope. Only a fool would believe what you're calling spam is actually
>>>> spam.
>>> Only a fool would believe unsolicited ads where they are not wanted is
>>> not SPAM.
>>>
>>> However, it seems you've just called a lot of respected hosting
>>> companies fools.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>  It is ENFORCEABLE (get a spell checker).
>>>> More proof of how you really are?  Good!  You're showing every newbie
>>>> in comp.lang.php that you're an idiot.  Hope that's what you wanted.
>>>> It's what you're getting.
>>> Nope.  Just that YOU are.  Can't even afford a spell checker.
>>>
>>>>> And it DOES mean something.
>>>> Nothing at all.
>>>>> Sorry.  
>>>> Liar.
>>> You're the one calling someone a LIAR!  ROFLMAO!
>>>
>>>>> Your arguments don't work.
>>>> It's not an argument, it's a fact.
>>> Show me where it is a FACT.  Otherwise, it is just YOUR OPINION.  And
>>> YOUR ARGUMENT.
>>>
>>>>>  They're too far out of date.
>>>> Good thing is, you don't get to decide.  
>>> Neither do you.
>>>
>>>>>>> But in this case the op is a troll well-known in a.w.w.  He just morphed
>>>>>>> names, and it took a little while to catch on (good catch, Karl!).
>>>>>> SO? What does that have to do with comp.lang.php?  
>>>>> I didn't start it.
>>>> So you're so controlled you simply MUST post to comp.lang.php.  Got
>>>> it.  You're owned, bigtime.
>>> I have the right to defend myself - especially against charges of
>>> criminal activity.  Period.  You don't like it?  Ignore the thread if
>>> you don't like it.
>>>
>>>>> I'm just trying to show people who Rafael
>>>>> Martinez-Minuesa Martinez really is
>>>> You're doing just fine at showing he's the holder of your leash.  Now
>>>> sit like a good little poodle.
>>> ROFLMAO!  You're even more stoopid than most people if you believe that.
>>>
>>> And if I called you a fraud and a liar, will you just ignore it?  I
>>> think not.  What would your employer do if he/she found out?
>>>
>>>>> - a troll and a spammer.
>>>> SPAM is BI>20.  His post was off topic, sure. But not spam.  If you're
>>>> saying off topic is spam then your posts to comp.lang.php (and
>>>> comp.infosystems.www..... are spam too).  Difference being:  YOU can
>>>> lose your account for it faster than he can.  Wanna see?
>>> Wrong, Gary.  And has been for years.  You are woefully out of date.
>> 
>> You DON'T get to say what SPAM is, you pitiful SCAMMER.
>> The Usenet is not yours and there are far more knowledgeable and
>> experienced people than you who know much better than you.
>> If you were not so arrogant and had just a little bit of common sense
>> you'd listen to them.
>> 
>
>And neither do you, trolling fraud. 

Ah yes, everyone's a troll and fraud for pointing out what a hypocrite
you are.

> But the newsgroup regulars do.

No, actually, in an alt.* group, they don't.

>And  the majority of them have classified your posts as SPAM.

Doesn't matter at all.  Don't like it?  Too bad.   

>
>Sorry, troll.

Everyone that knows what you are is a troll.  Neat!
-- 
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:29:03 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
>> RafaMinu wrote:
>>> On Jan 6, 5:50 am, Jerry Stuckle  wrote:
>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:58:48 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:21:20 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-bai...@no.where>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In  on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nos...@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it.  Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>>>>>> Fine.  I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>> Right.  Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>>>>>> There is.  The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup.  And the FAQs for
>>>>>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable.  Charters in unmoderated
>>>>>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable.  Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>>>>>> That's funny.  I've gotten quite a few hosting of accounts canceled
>>>>>>>> because I've reported spam.
>>>>>>> Only if it's real spam.  What you're calling spam isn't.  There are
>>>>>>> very specific rules.  
>>>>>> And according to the FAQ's in a.w.w, it is spam.
>>>>> A FAQ is only a list of frequently asked questions, Jerry. It is no
>>>>> way enforceable and can't change the meaning of the word.  >> They're
>>>>> called alt. for a reason.  
>>>> Sorry, you 're about 10 years behind the curve.
>>>>
>>>>>> Gee, it's the good ones who cancel accounts because I show them the
>>>>>> spam.
>>>>> Nope. Only a fool would believe what you're calling spam is actually
>>>>> spam.
>>>> Only a fool would believe unsolicited ads where they are not wanted is
>>>> not SPAM.
>>>>
>>>> However, it seems you've just called a lot of respected hosting
>>>> companies fools.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>  It is ENFORCEABLE (get a spell checker).
>>>>> More proof of how you really are?  Good!  You're showing every newbie
>>>>> in comp.lang.php that you're an idiot.  Hope that's what you wanted.
>>>>> It's what you're getting.
>>>> Nope.  Just that YOU are.  Can't even afford a spell checker.
>>>>
>>>>>> And it DOES mean something.
>>>>> Nothing at all.
>>>>>> Sorry.  
>>>>> Liar.
>>>> You're the one calling someone a LIAR!  ROFLMAO!
>>>>
>>>>>> Your arguments don't work.
>>>>> It's not an argument, it's a fact.
>>>> Show me where it is a FACT.  Otherwise, it is just YOUR OPINION.  And
>>>> YOUR ARGUMENT.
>>>>
>>>>>>  They're too far out of date.
>>>>> Good thing is, you don't get to decide.  
>>>> Neither do you.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> But in this case the op is a troll well-known in a.w.w.  He just morphed
>>>>>>>> names, and it took a little while to catch on (good catch, Karl!).
>>>>>>> SO? What does that have to do with comp.lang.php?  
>>>>>> I didn't start it.
>>>>> So you're so controlled you simply MUST post to comp.lang.php.  Got
>>>>> it.  You're owned, bigtime.
>>>> I have the right to defend myself - especially against charges of
>>>> criminal activity.  Period.  You don't like it?  Ignore the thread if
>>>> you don't like it.
>>>>
>>>>>> I'm just trying to show people who Rafael
>>>>>> Martinez-Minuesa Martinez really is
>>>>> You're doing just fine at showing he's the holder of your leash.  Now
>>>>> sit like a good little poodle.
>>>> ROFLMAO!  You're even more stoopid than most people if you believe that.
>>>>
>>>> And if I called you a fraud and a liar, will you just ignore it?  I
>>>> think not.  What would your employer do if he/she found out?
>>>>
>>>>>> - a troll and a spammer.
>>>>> SPAM is BI>20.  His post was off topic, sure. But not spam.  If you're
>>>>> saying off topic is spam then your posts to comp.lang.php (and
>>>>> comp.infosystems.www..... are spam too).  Difference being:  YOU can
>>>>> lose your account for it faster than he can.  Wanna see?
>>>> Wrong, Gary.  And has been for years.  You are woefully out of date.
>>> You DON'T get to say what SPAM is, you pitiful SCAMMER.
>>> The Usenet is not yours and there are far more knowledgeable and
>>> experienced people than you who know much better than you.
>>> If you were not so arrogant and had just a little bit of common sense
>>> you'd listen to them.
>>>
>> And neither do you, trolling fraud. 
> 
> Ah yes, everyone's a troll and fraud for pointing out what a hypocrite
> you are.
>

Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.

>> But the newsgroup regulars do.
> 
> No, actually, in an alt.* group, they don't.
> 

Wrong again, troll.

>> And  the majority of them have classified your posts as SPAM.
> 
> Doesn't matter at all.  Don't like it?  Too bad.   
>

It sure does to those ISP's who have canceled accounts due to the 
complaints.

>> Sorry, troll.
> 
> Everyone that knows what you are is a troll.  Neat!

Yep, troll.  Projecting again.


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:29:03 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> RafaMinu wrote:
>>>> On Jan 6, 5:50 am, Jerry Stuckle  wrote:
>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:58:48 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:21:20 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-bai...@no.where>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In  on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nos...@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it.  Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine.  I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Right.  Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is.  The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup.  And the FAQs for
>>>>>>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>>>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable.  Charters in unmoderated
>>>>>>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable.  Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>>>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>>>>>>> That's funny.  I've gotten quite a few hosting of accounts canceled
>>>>>>>>> because I've reported spam.
>>>>>>>> Only if it's real spam.  What you're calling spam isn't.  There are
>>>>>>>> very specific rules.  
>>>>>>> And according to the FAQ's in a.w.w, it is spam.
>>>>>> A FAQ is only a list of frequently asked questions, Jerry. It is no
>>>>>> way enforceable and can't change the meaning of the word.  >> They're
>>>>>> called alt. for a reason.  
>>>>> Sorry, you 're about 10 years behind the curve.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gee, it's the good ones who cancel accounts because I show them the
>>>>>>> spam.
>>>>>> Nope. Only a fool would believe what you're calling spam is actually
>>>>>> spam.
>>>>> Only a fool would believe unsolicited ads where they are not wanted is
>>>>> not SPAM.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, it seems you've just called a lot of respected hosting
>>>>> companies fools.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>  It is ENFORCEABLE (get a spell checker).
>>>>>> More proof of how you really are?  Good!  You're showing every newbie
>>>>>> in comp.lang.php that you're an idiot.  Hope that's what you wanted.
>>>>>> It's what you're getting.
>>>>> Nope.  Just that YOU are.  Can't even afford a spell checker.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> And it DOES mean something.
>>>>>> Nothing at all.
>>>>>>> Sorry.  
>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>> You're the one calling someone a LIAR!  ROFLMAO!
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your arguments don't work.
>>>>>> It's not an argument, it's a fact.
>>>>> Show me where it is a FACT.  Otherwise, it is just YOUR OPINION.  And
>>>>> YOUR ARGUMENT.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>  They're too far out of date.
>>>>>> Good thing is, you don't get to decide.  
>>>>> Neither do you.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But in this case the op is a troll well-known in a.w.w.  He just morphed
>>>>>>>>> names, and it took a little while to catch on (good catch, Karl!).
>>>>>>>> SO? What does that have to do with comp.lang.php?  
>>>>>>> I didn't start it.
>>>>>> So you're so controlled you simply MUST post to comp.lang.php.  Got
>>>>>> it.  You're owned, bigtime.
>>>>> I have the right to defend myself - especially against charges of
>>>>> criminal activity.  Period.  You don't like it?  Ignore the thread if
>>>>> you don't like it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm just trying to show people who Rafael
>>>>>>> Martinez-Minuesa Martinez really is
>>>>>> You're doing just fine at showing he's the holder of your leash.  Now
>>>>>> sit like a good little poodle.
>>>>> ROFLMAO!  You're even more stoopid than most people if you believe that.
>>>>>
>>>>> And if I called you a fraud and a liar, will you just ignore it?  I
>>>>> think not.  What would your employer do if he/she found out?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> - a troll and a spammer.
>>>>>> SPAM is BI>20.  His post was off topic, sure. But not spam.  If you're
>>>>>> saying off topic is spam then your posts to comp.lang.php (and
>>>>>> comp.infosystems.www..... are spam too).  Difference being:  YOU can
>>>>>> lose your account for it faster than he can.  Wanna see?
>>>>> Wrong, Gary.  And has been for years.  You are woefully out of date.
>>>> You DON'T get to say what SPAM is, you pitiful SCAMMER.
>>>> The Usenet is not yours and there are far more knowledgeable and
>>>> experienced people than you who know much better than you.
>>>> If you were not so arrogant and had just a little bit of common sense
>>>> you'd listen to them.
>>>>
>>> And neither do you, trolling fraud. 
>> 
>> Ah yes, everyone's a troll and fraud for pointing out what a hypocrite
>> you are.
>>
>
>Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.

You're the one who claims that off topic = spam, not me.


>
>>> But the newsgroup regulars do.
>> 
>> No, actually, in an alt.* group, they don't.
>> 
>
>Wrong again, troll.

Liar.

>
>>> And  the majority of them have classified your posts as SPAM.
>> 
>> Doesn't matter at all.  Don't like it?  Too bad.   
>>
>
>It sure does to those ISP's who have canceled accounts due to the 
>complaints.

Liar.




Oh, and don't forget:


Jerry claims suing is illegal

   From: Jerry Stuckle 
   Message-ID: 

   You'd like that, wouldn't you?  But I don't need to sue you.  There
are other ways to handle people like you.  I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

   From: Jerry Stuckle 
   Message-ID: 

   Gary L. Burnore wrote:
   > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
   >  wrote:

   >> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud.  
   >> See if you like it?
   > 
   > Go for it, dipshit.  I've been called far worse.  My employer is
   > DataBasix.com.  OOPS!  Too bad for you.
   > 

   Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?  
   ROFLMAO!

While also saying

   From: Jerry Stuckle 
   Message-ID: 

   WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD.  It has been and is registered.  You just
   can't find a web page for it.  Sorry, troll.
-- 
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:29:03 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> RafaMinu wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 6, 5:50 am, Jerry Stuckle  wrote:
>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:58:48 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:21:20 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-bai...@no.where>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In  on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nos...@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it.  Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine.  I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right.  Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is.  The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup.  And the FAQs for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>>>>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable.  Charters in unmoderated
>>>>>>>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable.  Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>>>>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>>>>>>>> That's funny.  I've gotten quite a few hosting of accounts canceled
>>>>>>>>>> because I've reported spam.
>>>>>>>>> Only if it's real spam.  What you're calling spam isn't.  There are
>>>>>>>>> very specific rules.  
>>>>>>>> And according to the FAQ's in a.w.w, it is spam.
>>>>>>> A FAQ is only a list of frequently asked questions, Jerry. It is no
>>>>>>> way enforceable and can't change the meaning of the word.  >> They're
>>>>>>> called alt. for a reason.  
>>>>>> Sorry, you 're about 10 years behind the curve.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gee, it's the good ones who cancel accounts because I show them the
>>>>>>>> spam.
>>>>>>> Nope. Only a fool would believe what you're calling spam is actually
>>>>>>> spam.
>>>>>> Only a fool would believe unsolicited ads where they are not wanted is
>>>>>> not SPAM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, it seems you've just called a lot of respected hosting
>>>>>> companies fools.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  It is ENFORCEABLE (get a spell checker).
>>>>>>> More proof of how you really are?  Good!  You're showing every newbie
>>>>>>> in comp.lang.php that you're an idiot.  Hope that's what you wanted.
>>>>>>> It's what you're getting.
>>>>>> Nope.  Just that YOU are.  Can't even afford a spell checker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And it DOES mean something.
>>>>>>> Nothing at all.
>>>>>>>> Sorry.  
>>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>> You're the one calling someone a LIAR!  ROFLMAO!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your arguments don't work.
>>>>>>> It's not an argument, it's a fact.
>>>>>> Show me where it is a FACT.  Otherwise, it is just YOUR OPINION.  And
>>>>>> YOUR ARGUMENT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  They're too far out of date.
>>>>>>> Good thing is, you don't get to decide.  
>>>>>> Neither do you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But in this case the op is a troll well-known in a.w.w.  He just morphed
>>>>>>>>>> names, and it took a little while to catch on (good catch, Karl!).
>>>>>>>>> SO? What does that have to do with comp.lang.php?  
>>>>>>>> I didn't start it.
>>>>>>> So you're so controlled you simply MUST post to comp.lang.php.  Got
>>>>>>> it.  You're owned, bigtime.
>>>>>> I have the right to defend myself - especially against charges of
>>>>>> criminal activity.  Period.  You don't like it?  Ignore the thread if
>>>>>> you don't like it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm just trying to show people who Rafael
>>>>>>>> Martinez-Minuesa Martinez really is
>>>>>>> You're doing just fine at showing he's the holder of your leash.  Now
>>>>>>> sit like a good little poodle.
>>>>>> ROFLMAO!  You're even more stoopid than most people if you believe that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And if I called you a fraud and a liar, will you just ignore it?  I
>>>>>> think not.  What would your employer do if he/she found out?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - a troll and a spammer.
>>>>>>> SPAM is BI>20.  His post was off topic, sure. But not spam.  If you're
>>>>>>> saying off topic is spam then your posts to comp.lang.php (and
>>>>>>> comp.infosystems.www..... are spam too).  Difference being:  YOU can
>>>>>>> lose your account for it faster than he can.  Wanna see?
>>>>>> Wrong, Gary.  And has been for years.  You are woefully out of date.
>>>>> You DON'T get to say what SPAM is, you pitiful SCAMMER.
>>>>> The Usenet is not yours and there are far more knowledgeable and
>>>>> experienced people than you who know much better than you.
>>>>> If you were not so arrogant and had just a little bit of common sense
>>>>> you'd listen to them.
>>>>>
>>>> And neither do you, trolling fraud. 
>>> Ah yes, everyone's a troll and fraud for pointing out what a hypocrite
>>> you are.
>>>
>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
> 
> You're the one who claims that off topic = spam, not me.
> 
> 
>>>> But the newsgroup regulars do.
>>> No, actually, in an alt.* group, they don't.
>>>
>> Wrong again, troll.
> 
> Liar.
> 
>>>> And  the majority of them have classified your posts as SPAM.
>>> Doesn't matter at all.  Don't like it?  Too bad.   
>>>
>> It sure does to those ISP's who have canceled accounts due to the 
>> complaints.
> 
> Liar.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Oh, and don't forget:
> 
> 
> Jerry claims suing is illegal
> 
>    From: Jerry Stuckle 
>    Message-ID: 
> 
>    You'd like that, wouldn't you?  But I don't need to sue you.  There
> are other ways to handle people like you.  I prefer the legal ways.
> 
> 
> 
> Jerry on websites:
> 
>    From: Jerry Stuckle 
>    Message-ID: 
> 
>    Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>    > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>    >  wrote:
> 
>    >> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud.  
>    >> See if you like it?
>    > 
>    > Go for it, dipshit.  I've been called far worse.  My employer is
>    > DataBasix.com.  OOPS!  Too bad for you.
>    > 
> 
>    Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?  
>    ROFLMAO!
> 
> While also saying
> 
>    From: Jerry Stuckle 
>    Message-ID: 
> 
>    WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD.  It has been and is registered.  You just
>    can't find a web page for it.  Sorry, troll.


Gee, you're stuck in a rut, Gary.  But then you're just a stoopid troll, 
so I expect nothing better from you.

ROFLMAO!

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

<snip>

>Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.

Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.


-- 
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)

http://www.insurgent.org/

#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top Assholes on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
> 
> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.

Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick to the 
subjects that are on topic in this forum. 

Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.fucknozzles.

K. A. Cannon wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
> 
> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
> 
> 

ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
anyway?  It sure wasn't me.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
> K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> 
>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>  wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
> 
> Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick to the 
> subjects that are on topic in this forum. 
> 
> Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.fucknozzles.
> 

I am talking about one particular troll.

But maybe you should go back and figure out who added your newsgroup to 
the list in the first place.  It wasn't I.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>K. A. Cannon wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>> 
>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>> 
>> 
>
>ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>anyway?  It sure wasn't me.

Gonna claim it was ME, poodle?  More proof you're owned.  

(Que a "no, I own you" post by the poodle.

Go on, Jerry. You know you must.  You have NO CHOICE.


-- 
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Jerry Stuckle  wrote in
news:XNednYqIVf3K3xzanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com: 

> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>> K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't
>>>> spam. 
>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious,
>>> over quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu
>>> molesting, Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>> 
>> Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick
>> to the subjects that are on topic in this forum. 
>> 
>> Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.fucknozzles.
>> 
> 
> I am talking about one particular troll.
> 
> But maybe you should go back and figure out who added your newsgroup
> to the list in the first place.  It wasn't I.

You're whining in it now, fuckhead. It's off topic in my newsgroup. Read 
the fucking charter. What part of that don't you understand?

Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle  wrote in
> news:XNednYqIVf3K3xzanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com: 
> 
>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>> K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't
>>>>> spam. 
>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious,
>>>> over quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu
>>>> molesting, Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>> Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick
>>> to the subjects that are on topic in this forum. 
>>>
>>> Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.fucknozzles.
>>>
>> I am talking about one particular troll.
>>
>> But maybe you should go back and figure out who added your newsgroup
>> to the list in the first place.  It wasn't I.
> 
> You're whining in it now, fuckhead. It's off topic in my newsgroup. Read 
> the fucking charter. What part of that don't you understand?
> 

I didn't start this thread in your newsgroup, fuckhead.  Talk to those 
who did.

What part don't you understand?


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>
>>>
>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
> 
> Gonna claim it was ME, poodle?  More proof you're owned.  
> 
> (Que a "no, I own you" post by the poodle.
> 
> Go on, Jerry. You know you must.  You have NO CHOICE.
> 
> 

I made no such claim, troll.

But you're right - I OWN YOU!  And once again you've proven it.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:33:17 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle  wrote in
>> news:XNednYqIVf3K3xzanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com: 
>> 
>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>> K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't
>>>>>> spam. 
>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious,
>>>>> over quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu
>>>>> molesting, Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>> Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick
>>>> to the subjects that are on topic in this forum. 
>>>>
>>>> Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.fucknozzles.
>>>>
>>> I am talking about one particular troll.
>>>
>>> But maybe you should go back and figure out who added your newsgroup
>>> to the list in the first place.  It wasn't I.
>> 
>> You're whining in it now, fuckhead. It's off topic in my newsgroup. Read 
>> the fucking charter. What part of that don't you understand?
>> 
>
>I didn't start this thread in your newsgroup, fuckhead.  Talk to those 
>who did.
>
Your posts are the one's I see in alt.fucknozzles.  Your posts are off
charter.  It's your reponsibility to fix your from line. Is it that
you don't know how?  We can send you instructions if you want.
-- 
Just your average Joe

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>K. A. Cannon wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>> 
>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>> 
>> 
>
>ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>anyway?  It sure wasn't me.

Why do you insist on lying like this?

-- 
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)

http://www.insurgent.org/

#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top Assholes on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

Joeseph P. Blow wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:33:17 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle  wrote in
>>> news:XNednYqIVf3K3xzanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com: 
>>>
>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>>> K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
>>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't
>>>>>>> spam. 
>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious,
>>>>>> over quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu
>>>>>> molesting, Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>> Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick
>>>>> to the subjects that are on topic in this forum. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.fucknozzles.
>>>>>
>>>> I am talking about one particular troll.
>>>>
>>>> But maybe you should go back and figure out who added your newsgroup
>>>> to the list in the first place.  It wasn't I.
>>> You're whining in it now, fuckhead. It's off topic in my newsgroup. Read 
>>> the fucking charter. What part of that don't you understand?
>>>
>> I didn't start this thread in your newsgroup, fuckhead.  Talk to those 
>> who did.
>>
> Your posts are the one's I see in alt.fucknozzles.  Your posts are off
> charter.  It's your reponsibility to fix your from line. Is it that
> you don't know how?  We can send you instructions if you want.


Then block me.  Obviously there are others you have blocked also - or 
you'd be seeing the rest of the conversation.  I have never added 
alt.fucknozzles - or any other newsgroup - to this list.

I know how to remove newsgroups.  I've done it before in this very 
thread.  But certain people have added them back.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

K. A. Cannon wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>
>>>
>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
> 
> Why do you insist on lying like this?
> 

Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
newsgroup to the list.

Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.

That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:45:02 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>Joeseph P. Blow wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:33:17 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>> Jerry Stuckle  wrote in
>>>> news:XNednYqIVf3K3xzanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com: 
>>>>
>>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>>>> K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
>>>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't
>>>>>>>> spam. 
>>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious,
>>>>>>> over quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu
>>>>>>> molesting, Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>> Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick
>>>>>> to the subjects that are on topic in this forum. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.fucknozzles.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I am talking about one particular troll.
>>>>>
>>>>> But maybe you should go back and figure out who added your newsgroup
>>>>> to the list in the first place.  It wasn't I.
>>>> You're whining in it now, fuckhead. It's off topic in my newsgroup. Read 
>>>> the fucking charter. What part of that don't you understand?
>>>>
>>> I didn't start this thread in your newsgroup, fuckhead.  Talk to those 
>>> who did.
>>>
>> Your posts are the one's I see in alt.fucknozzles.  Your posts are off
>> charter.  It's your reponsibility to fix your from line. Is it that
>> you don't know how?  We can send you instructions if you want.
>
>
>Then block me. 

What, and miss you getting your azzz kicked?  No way.

> Obviously there are others you have blocked also - or 
>you'd be seeing the rest of the conversation.  

Nope, No one blocked.  Your post are the only ones appearing other
than those of people here telling you to go away.  Why did you add our
group in the first place?

>I have never added 
>alt.fucknozzles - or any other newsgroup - to this list.

It's there now.  That means you added it.  Doesn't matter if it was
there before, you have control over the newsgroups line.  It's up to
you to make sure the right groups are there.  Can't do it? Ask for
help. Someone will tell you how.


>
>I know how to remove newsgroups.  I've done it before in this very 
>thread. 

Prove it and remove alt.fucknozzles.  Here's your chance to prove
you're not a liar.

> But certain people have added them back.

And you reply.
-- 
Just your average Joe

Jerry Stuckle  wrote in
news:GbSdnSguz4TM1BzanZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@comcast.com: 

> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle  wrote in
>> news:XNednYqIVf3K3xzanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com: 
>> 
>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>> K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't
>>>>>> spam. 
>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious,
>>>>> over quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu
>>>>> molesting, Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>> Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick
>>>> to the subjects that are on topic in this forum. 
>>>>
>>>> Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
>>>> alt.fucknozzles. 
>>>>
>>> I am talking about one particular troll.
>>>
>>> But maybe you should go back and figure out who added your newsgroup
>>> to the list in the first place.  It wasn't I.
>> 
>> You're whining in it now, fuckhead. It's off topic in my newsgroup.
>> Read the fucking charter. What part of that don't you understand?
>> 
> 
> I didn't start this thread in your newsgroup, fuckhead.  Talk to those
> who did.
> 
> What part don't you understand?

You're continuing it, dipshit. Only a kook thinks they're exempt, kook.

Joeseph P. Blow wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:45:02 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
>> Joeseph P. Blow wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:33:17 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>>> Jerry Stuckle  wrote in
>>>>> news:XNednYqIVf3K3xzanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com: 
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>>>>> K. A. Cannon  wrote in news:flre18$5vj$1
>>>>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't
>>>>>>>>> spam. 
>>>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious,
>>>>>>>> over quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu
>>>>>>>> molesting, Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>> Jerry, your whines *are* off topic in alt.fucknozzles. Kindly stick
>>>>>>> to the subjects that are on topic in this forum. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.fucknozzles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am talking about one particular troll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But maybe you should go back and figure out who added your newsgroup
>>>>>> to the list in the first place.  It wasn't I.
>>>>> You're whining in it now, fuckhead. It's off topic in my newsgroup. Read 
>>>>> the fucking charter. What part of that don't you understand?
>>>>>
>>>> I didn't start this thread in your newsgroup, fuckhead.  Talk to those 
>>>> who did.
>>>>
>>> Your posts are the one's I see in alt.fucknozzles.  Your posts are off
>>> charter.  It's your reponsibility to fix your from line. Is it that
>>> you don't know how?  We can send you instructions if you want.
>>
>> Then block me. 
> 
> What, and miss you getting your azzz kicked?  No way.
> 
>> Obviously there are others you have blocked also - or 
>> you'd be seeing the rest of the conversation.  
> 
> Nope, No one blocked.  Your post are the only ones appearing other
> than those of people here telling you to go away.  Why did you add our
> group in the first place?
>

Then your news hosting company has some of the others blocked.  But 
that's not surprising that they would be blocking certain people.

>> I have never added 
>> alt.fucknozzles - or any other newsgroup - to this list.
> 
> It's there now.  That means you added it.  Doesn't matter if it was
> there before, you have control over the newsgroups line.  It's up to
> you to make sure the right groups are there.  Can't do it? Ask for
> help. Someone will tell you how.
> 

No, it doesn't mean I added it.  It means it was set when I replied to 
the message.  Check some of the other newsgroups where this is cross 
posted.  Or maybe check your newsgroup in google groups.  Because others 
are definitely posting to your newsgroup.

Maybe someone can help you figure out why you aren't seeing them?

> 
>> I know how to remove newsgroups.  I've done it before in this very 
>> thread. 
> 
> Prove it and remove alt.fucknozzles.  Here's your chance to prove
> you're not a liar.
> 

And miss my chance to respond to you?  ROFLMAO.  But it's been removed 
from the FUP.  As have other newsgroups.

>> But certain people have added them back.
> 
> And you reply.

Yep.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:44:34 -0500, K. A. Cannon
 wrote:

>On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> wrote:
>
>>K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> <snip>
>>> 
>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>> 
>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>
>Why do you insist on lying like this?

Because he's a tardlett?   How come Gary gets all the fun kooks?


-- 
Just your average Joe

Jerry Stuckle  posted
 in alt.fucknozzles on
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:

>K. A. Cannon wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>> 
>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>> 
>
>Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>newsgroup to the list.

Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?

>Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.

How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
charlatan.

>That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.

You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?

And where's your web page?


 

-- 
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)

Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.
It's already tomorrow in Australia.
-Charles Schultz

COOSN-266-06-02374
Hammer of Thor, April 2005
PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER June 2007
#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top Assholes on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:08:49 -0500, K. A. Cannon
 wrote:

>Jerry Stuckle  posted
> in alt.fucknozzles on
>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>
>>K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>> 
>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>> 
>>
>>Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>newsgroup to the list.
>
>Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>
>>Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>>it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
>
>How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
>charlatan.
>
>>That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
>
>You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>
>And where's your web page?
>
He's running a home system from comcast, they don't allow servers.
He's not ALLOWED to run a website.  
-- 
Just your average Joe

K. A. Cannon wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>  in alt.fucknozzles on
> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
> 
>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>
>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>> newsgroup to the list.
> 
> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>

Read back in the thread.  The troll Gary L. Burnore added your newsgroup 
to the list.

>> Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>> it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
> 
> How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
> charlatan.
> 

ROFLMAO!  You can't even go back and see what the first message was 
posted to?

>> That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
> 
> You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>

I did.  Check this thread.  And actually, it wasn't a FUP - I went back 
and got the post where Gary added it.  I posted the headers in this thread.

I find it funny - it looks like the troll's entire usenet server has 
been banned from some of the other servers!

> And where's your web page?
> 
> 

What do you care?  It's a private site, for registered users only, and 
requires a userid/password to access.



-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Joeseph P. Blow wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:08:49 -0500, K. A. Cannon
>  wrote:
> 
>> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>>  in alt.fucknozzles on
>> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>>
>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>>
>>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>> newsgroup to the list.
>> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>>
>>> Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>>> it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
>> How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
>> charlatan.
>>
>>> That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
>> You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>>
>> And where's your web page?
>>
> He's running a home system from comcast, they don't allow servers.
> He's not ALLOWED to run a website.  

Nope, and I wouldn't run a business site on my home computer, anyway. 
Sorry, Charlie.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:28:48 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>Joeseph P. Blow wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:08:49 -0500, K. A. Cannon
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>>>  in alt.fucknozzles on
>>> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>>>
>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>>> newsgroup to the list.
>>> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>>>
>>>> Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>>>> it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
>>> How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
>>> charlatan.
>>>
>>>> That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
>>> You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>>>
>>> And where's your web page?
>>>
>> He's running a home system from comcast, they don't allow servers.
>> He's not ALLOWED to run a website.  
>
>Nope

Told ya.  You're not allowed. Now THAT's funny!

-- 
Just your average Joe

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:28:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>K. A. Cannon wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>>  in alt.fucknozzles on
>> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>> 
>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>>
>>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>> newsgroup to the list.
>> 
>> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>>
>
>Read back in the thread.  The troll Gary L. Burnore added your newsgroup 
>to the list.

Why must you tell such an outright lie?  Do you think we can't follow
the thread?



>
>>> Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>>> it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
>> 
>> How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
>> charlatan.
>> 
>
>ROFLMAO!  You can't even go back and see what the first message was 
>posted to?

You obviously can't.  Why are you laughing?  You can't even tell how
the group got into the newsgroups line?

>
>>> That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
>> 
>> You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>>
>
>I did. 

Liar.

> Check this thread.  And actually, it wasn't a FUP - I went back 
>and got the post where Gary added it.  I posted the headers in this thread.

Liar.

>
>I find it funny - it looks like the troll's entire usenet server has 
>been banned from some of the other servers!
>
>> And where's your web page?
>> 
>> 
>
>What do you care?  It's a private site, 

There is no site.  You're not allowed to run one.  


>for registered users only, and requires a userid/password to access.

Wow! A login and password?  OOOh, we're frightened.  Of course, there
is no site, so there's nothing to do but laugh at you.

-- 
Just your average Joe

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:28:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>K. A. Cannon wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>>  in alt.fucknozzles on
>> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>> 
>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>>
>>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>> newsgroup to the list.
>> 
>> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>>
>
>Read back in the thread.  The troll Gary L. Burnore added your newsgroup 
>to the list.

Knew you'd say it. Prediced it yesterday and you do it today.

    Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:34:26 -0500
    From: Jerry Stuckle 
    In-Reply-To: <flrggh$9pn$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
    Message-ID: 


    Gary L. Burnore wrote:
    > On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
    >  wrote:
    > 
    >> K. A. Cannon wrote:
    >> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to 
    >> this list, anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
    > 
    > Gonna claim it was ME, poodle?  More proof you're owned.  
    > 
    > (Que a "no, I own you" post by the poodle.
    > 
    > Go on, Jerry. You know you must.  You have NO CHOICE.
    > 
    > 

    I made no such claim, troll.




>
>>> Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>>> it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
>> 
>> How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
>> charlatan.
>> 
>
>ROFLMAO!  You can't even go back and see what the first message was 
>posted to?
>
>>> That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
>> 
>> You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>>
>
>I did.  Check this thread.  And actually, it wasn't a FUP - I went back 
>and got the post where Gary added it.


You're such a well trained poodle, you did it twice!   Good poodle!



    Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:34:26 -0500
    From: Jerry Stuckle 
    In-Reply-To: <flrggh$9pn$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
    Message-ID: 


    Gary L. Burnore wrote:
    > On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
    >  wrote:
    > 
    >> K. A. Cannon wrote:
    >> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to 
    >> this list, anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
    > 
    > Gonna claim it was ME, poodle?  More proof you're owned.  
    > 
    > (Que a "no, I own you" post by the poodle.
    > 
    > Go on, Jerry. You know you must.  You have NO CHOICE.
    > 
    > 

    I made no such claim, troll.




>I posted the headers in this thread.
>
>I find it funny - it looks like the troll's entire usenet server has 
>been banned from some of the other servers!

Yeah! We're blocked from all of comcast from what I hear.  hahahahaha.

>
>> And where's your web page?
>> 
>> 
>
>What do you care?  It's a private site, for registered users only, and 
>requires a userid/password to access.

Liar!  You have no site.  You can't afford one.  You can claim you
have one all you want, but we all know you're a liar.
-- 
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:37:24 -0500, Joeseph P. Blow 
wrote:

>On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:28:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> wrote:
>
>>K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>>>  in alt.fucknozzles on
>>> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>>> 
>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>>> newsgroup to the list.
>>> 
>>> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>>>
>>
>>Read back in the thread.  The troll Gary L. Burnore added your newsgroup 
>>to the list.
>
>Why must you tell such an outright lie?  Do you think we can't follow
>the thread?
>

My poodle can't help himself.  He has no choice.

>
>
>>
>>>> Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>>>> it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
>>> 
>>> How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
>>> charlatan.
>>> 
>>
>>ROFLMAO!  You can't even go back and see what the first message was 
>>posted to?
>
>You obviously can't.  Why are you laughing?  You can't even tell how
>the group got into the newsgroups line?
]>
>>
>>>> That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
>>> 
>>> You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>>>
>>
>>I did. 
>
>Liar.
>
>> Check this thread.  And actually, it wasn't a FUP - I went back 
>>and got the post where Gary added it.  I posted the headers in this thread.
>
>Liar.
>
>>
>>I find it funny - it looks like the troll's entire usenet server has 
>>been banned from some of the other servers!
>>
>>> And where's your web page?
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>What do you care?  It's a private site, 
>
>There is no site.  You're not allowed to run one.  

You're right.  It's obvious he doesn't have a website.  With his ego,
if he did, he'd be plastering it all over the place.  Nope, he's got
nothing.

>
>>for registered users only, and requires a userid/password to access.
>
>Wow! A login and password?  OOOh, we're frightened.  Of course, there
>is no site, so there's nothing to do but laugh at you.

Wonder what the poodle's afraid of!

-- 
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
                                      |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Joeseph P. Blow wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:28:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>>>  in alt.fucknozzles on
>>> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>>>
>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>>> newsgroup to the list.
>>> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>>>
>> Read back in the thread.  The troll Gary L. Burnore added your newsgroup 
>> to the list.
> 
> Why must you tell such an outright lie?  Do you think we can't follow
> the thread?
>

You obviously can't.  I've posted the headers which show Gary L. Burnore 
added your newsgroup to the messages.  But it seems his newsgroup server 
has been banned from your server.  That's not my problem.

> 
> 
>>>> Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>>>> it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
>>> How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
>>> charlatan.
>>>
>> ROFLMAO!  You can't even go back and see what the first message was 
>> posted to?
> 
> You obviously can't.  Why are you laughing?  You can't even tell how
> the group got into the newsgroups line?
> 

Yep, and I pointed out exactly where it happened.  Message headers and 
everything.

>>>> That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
>>> You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>>>
>> I did. 
> 
> Liar.
>

Wrong answer.  Check again.

>> Check this thread.  And actually, it wasn't a FUP - I went back 
>> and got the post where Gary added it.  I posted the headers in this thread.
> 
> Liar.
> 

Can't even look back and find the headers I posted?  ROFLMAO!

>> I find it funny - it looks like the troll's entire usenet server has 
>> been banned from some of the other servers!
>>
>>> And where's your web page?
>>>
>>>
>> What do you care?  It's a private site, 
> 
> There is no site.  You're not allowed to run one.  
>

ROFLMAO!  Tell my customers that.  They use it every day.

> 
>> for registered users only, and requires a userid/password to access.
> 
> Wow! A login and password?  OOOh, we're frightened.  Of course, there
> is no site, so there's nothing to do but laugh at you.
> 

Yep, it's a private site.  You aren't invited.  ROFLMAO!

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:28:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>  wrote:
> 
>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>>>  in alt.fucknozzles on
>>> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>>>
>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>>> newsgroup to the list.
>>> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>>>
>> Read back in the thread.  The troll Gary L. Burnore added your newsgroup 
>> to the list.
> 
> Knew you'd say it. Prediced it yesterday and you do it today.
> 
>     Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:34:26 -0500
>     From: Jerry Stuckle 
>     In-Reply-To: <flrggh$9pn$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>     Message-ID: 
> 
> 
>     Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>     > On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>     >  wrote:
>     > 
>     >> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>     >> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to 
>     >> this list, anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>     > 
>     > Gonna claim it was ME, poodle?  More proof you're owned.  
>     > 
>     > (Que a "no, I own you" post by the poodle.
>     > 
>     > Go on, Jerry. You know you must.  You have NO CHOICE.
>     > 
>     > 
> 
>     I made no such claim, troll.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>>> Might I suggest you try again.  Go back to the first message.  See what 
>>>> it was in response to.  Now go back to that message.
>>> How about you just admit you are addle brained and an unrepentant
>>> charlatan.
>>>
>> ROFLMAO!  You can't even go back and see what the first message was 
>> posted to?
>>
>>>> That's how your group was added - as a fup.  The headers will show it.
>>> You are the interweb genius...how about you show us?
>>>
>> I did.  Check this thread.  And actually, it wasn't a FUP - I went back 
>> and got the post where Gary added it.
> 
> 
> You're such a well trained poodle, you did it twice!   Good poodle!
> 
> 
> 
>     Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:34:26 -0500
>     From: Jerry Stuckle 
>     In-Reply-To: <flrggh$9pn$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>     Message-ID: 
> 
> 
>     Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>     > On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>     >  wrote:
>     > 
>     >> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>     >> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to 
>     >> this list, anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>     > 
>     > Gonna claim it was ME, poodle?  More proof you're owned.  
>     > 
>     > (Que a "no, I own you" post by the poodle.
>     > 
>     > Go on, Jerry. You know you must.  You have NO CHOICE.
>     > 
>     > 
> 
>     I made no such claim, troll.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> I posted the headers in this thread.
>>
>> I find it funny - it looks like the troll's entire usenet server has 
>> been banned from some of the other servers!
> 
> Yeah! We're blocked from all of comcast from what I hear.  hahahahaha.
> 
>>> And where's your web page?
>>>
>>>
>> What do you care?  It's a private site, for registered users only, and 
>> requires a userid/password to access.
> 
> Liar!  You have no site.  You can't afford one.  You can claim you
> have one all you want, but we all know you're a liar.


ROFLAMO!  Speak, troll, speak!

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:54:15 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>Joeseph P. Blow wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:28:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>> Jerry Stuckle  posted
>>>>  in alt.fucknozzles on
>>>> Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:46:44 -0500:
>>>>
>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:22:46 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope.  You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite.  I don't spam.
>>>>>>>> Keep your spamming bullshite out of alt.fucknozzles you tedious, over
>>>>>>>> quoting, pontificating, sanctimonious, self righteous, Emu molesting,
>>>>>>>> Alpaca scat fetishist, Llama fellating picayune.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ROFLMAO!  Why not find out who added your newsgroup to this list, 
>>>>>>> anyway?  It sure wasn't me.
>>>>>> Why do you insist on lying like this?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, check again.  I never added alt.fucknozzles or any other 
>>>>> newsgroup to the list.
>>>> Then how did alt.fucknozzles get in the post of yours I am replied to?
>>>>
>>> Read back in the thread.  The troll Gary L. Burnore added your newsg