On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:32:26 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
 wrote:

>RafaMinu wrote:
>> On Jan 3, 5:38 pm, "dE|_"  wrote:
>>>> "RafaMinu"  wrote
>>> [snip]
>>>> Since you are unable to contribute anything positive to the thread,
>>>> I'm going to add a few more links:
>>>> Job Opening for Web Accessibility QA
>>>> If you or someone you know has good experience and knowledge in Web
>>>> Accessibility, and wants a good job in California (Silicon Valley),
>>>> please contact me, Dennis, at webaxe at gmail dot com. The position is
>>>> in the QA department for a company that does a financial web
>>>> application.
>>>> http://webaxe.___________-qa.html
>>>> Open Posts
>>>> MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
>>>> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>>>> Web Accessibility Engineer
>>>> European Research Consortium on Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM)
>>>> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>>>> Web Accessibility and Ageing Consultant
>>>> http://www.w3.org/_________ecruitment/
>>>> Now, if you want to discuss these postings and/or contribute with
>>>> other links, please do so.
>>>> Otherwise stay off this thread and take your off-topic deviations
>>>> somewhere else.
>>> Now you've just gone and got your fingers up in the air in rebellion like a
>>> kid. "F*ck you I won't do what you tell me"
>> 
>> Up yours ¡¡¡
>> 
>
>You did not start this discussion with usability issues. You started it 
>with SPAM.  Plain and simple.  And now you SPAM more.
>
>You aren't going to find anyone to discuss SPAM with you.
>
>And with that attitude, you won't find anyone to discuss ANYTHING with 
>you - unless it's another spammer.

In the same way that you cant get anyone to discuss anything with you,
unless they're another loony anti-spam zealot?