|
|
|
date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:36 +0000,
group: uk.net.web.authoring
back
Good or Bad?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7163547.stm
date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:36 +0000
author: Andy Jacobs
|
Re: Good or Bad?
<uk.net.web.authoring>
<Andy Jacobs>
<Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:36 +0000>
<C39D6008.F0A9%nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7163547.stm
>
At 0.6% of users i doubt many people give a fuck .
--
www.krustov.co.uk
date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:58:53 -0000
author: Krustov
|
Re: Good or Bad?
"Andy Jacobs" wrote in a message...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7163547.stm
Bad to think of a company break-down and coffee machines going to the dump
etc but good that users of NS will move on with the times.
The best/odd thing I remember from the last NS was that it offered displays
in both IE and Mozilla modes which gives a hint that it wasn't much a
browser of it's own anyway.
---dE|_---
date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:42:13 GMT
author: dE|_
|
Re: Good or Bad?
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:36 +0000, Andy Jacobs
wrote in
<C39D6008.F0A9%nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk>:
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7163547.stm
Netscape (the company rather than the browser) did some things I thought
were bad so on the whole I a not sorry to see them go.
--
Owen Rees
[one of] my preferred email address[es] and more stuff can be
found at <http://www.users.waitrose.com/~owenrees/index.html>
date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:53:36 +0000
author: Owen Rees
|
Re: Good or Bad?
"Andy Jacobs" put a link to...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7163547.stm
>
But on another issue;
I've only been on Usenet for about 3 years and it seems the MFI perseverance
bloke has been abusing it for decades. I am seeing great composure round
here- is everybody that sick of it that they just don't bother?
---dE|_---
date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:12:53 GMT
author: dE|_
|
Re: Good or Bad?
In <9MVej.18691$ov2.6345@newsfe5-win.ntli.net> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
00:12:53 GMT, "dE|_" wrote:
>I've only been on Usenet for about 3 years and it seems the MFI perseverance
>bloke has been abusing it for decades. I am seeing great composure round
>here- is everybody that sick of it that they just don't bother?
Sensible use of killfiles and you can join those of us who had no
idea it was that time of the cycle again.
--
DG
date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:49:22 +0000
author: Dick Gaughan
|
Re: Good or Bad?
Andy Jacobs wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7163547.stm
Was I the only one who misparsed the article title?
"Web icon set to be discontinued"
I figured someone had been publishing a set of icons for use on the web
(e.g. little house for the home page link, picture of a pen and paper for
the "contact us" page, etc) and had decided to discontinue it.
This interpretation was reinforced by the illustrations accompanying the
article: a large Netscape icon, and a large Firefox icon.
re: Netscape, I think what's surprising is that they've clung on this
long. Since Netscape 6, they've just been clumsy rebrandings of various
Mozilla products (Netscape 6/7 of the Mozilla suite, and 8/9 of Firefox).
Some more clumsy than others: 6.0x and 6.1x were downright awful, though
in fairness, that's mostly because the Mozilla core was very unstable at
that time -- 6.2x was usable and 7.x was much more polished.
However, this is not really the end of Netscape -- just the end of the
Netscape name.
--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
[Geek of HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python/Apache/Linux]
[OS: Linux 2.6.17.14-mm-desktop-9mdvsmp, up 5 days, 2:59.]
Sharing Music with Apple iTunes
http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/11/28/itunes-sharing/
date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:57:01 +0000
author: Toby A Inkster
|
|
|