On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:58:11 +0100, Paul Jones wrote:

> On 9 Oct 2009 16:44:19 GMT, Bob Eager  wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:36:24 +0100, Paul Jones wrote:
>>
>>> I like:
>>> A certain amount of inclusive gigabytes for peak and off-peak.
>>> 
>>> Purchase topups if needed (I never have): 1 off-peak GB costs x
>>> amount. 1 peak GB costs x amount
>>> 
>>> Oops that is what we have now. Guess we have been doing things all
>>> wrong up to now.
>>
>>It's not, quite. I pay for 4GB peak and 100GB offpeak per month. I don't
>>know how much one peak GB costs. Or how much one offpeak GB costs. I
>>just pay a lump sum.
>>
>>You've just described the new pricing model!
> 
> Really? Note I did not need to use the word 'unit' once.

That's because you didn't describe it very well. In fact you described it 
so badly, you didn't notice you were describing it.

If you don't mind me asking, what package are you on at present? It'd be 
interesting to see if you would be worse off...



-- 
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
 http://www.mirrorservice.org