This is a formal complaint to the chief moderator of the group
uk.rec.cycling.moderated.

 

I have emailed the moderators of uk.rec.cycling.moderated at the
address:  uk-rec-cycling-moderated-request (at) usenet.org.uk.

The email failed.

I understand that this is a known problem.

I request a statement from the lead moderator of the moderated group:

1) Are you already aware of this problem?

2) Do you think it is acceptable that some users cannot email the
moderators?

3) What are your time scales for correcting this problem?

I would like the chief moderator to reply to these questions in this
news group.

If he thinks that is not appropriate - I would ask that he replies to
the uk.* committee - who could then perhaps clarify to all users what
is the current situation.


If this post is inappropriate - I would be obliged if someone could
advise on the correct course of action for me to take to get this
problem resolved.

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:28:00  
uk.net.news.moderation jms 

>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:01:03 +0000, "Wm..."
> wrote:
>
>>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:11:46 
>>uk.net.news.moderation jms 
>>
>>>ffs - can you not see that I was taking the piss out of him.
>>>
>>>He has got an "IP address" - so what - I also can generate  several
>>>million which was the point I was making.  How many did he want?
>>
>>I only needed one.  Place, time and person follow easily from that.
>
>Now then Worm..
>
>You really are intriguing me.
>
>So you have had an email from "someone".

If it wasn't you it was a lot like you.

Perhaps someone likes you so much they masquerade as you?

The police will be able to work it out.

>I would be interested in what you mean by - and how you expect to
>obtain the "place, time and person"   - which you *think* is somehow
>associated  with that IP address, which may or may not be associated
>with that email.

Easy if you know how to read e-mail headers.

>Please can you help out here - as I am sure there are loads of people
>who would like to know how you do that.

I wouldn't want to teach someone that knows how to suck an egg how to do 
so.

>You obviously have a very, very cunning plan.

No, it is a plain one.

>PS - Have I said that I think that you are a fuckwit?

You think so many people are fuckwits that we know your mirror is 
broken.

>Anyway - after you have answered those question - perhaps you could
>explain why you broke your word.

I haven't.  As usual you are imagining someone said something.

-- 
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days