Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:25:05  
uk.net.news.moderation jms 

>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:07:51 +0000, "Wm..."
> wrote:
>
>>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:06:33 
>>uk.net.news.moderation "Just zis Guy, you know?"
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:55:24 +0000, Tom Crispin
>>><kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>>>
>>>>ITYM the titanium list.  Or is it the arborium list?
>>>
>>>Unobtainium, surely?  But a bonus point for the Yehuda reference :-)
>>
>>If this goes the way of bank cards soon there will be a black list.
>
>
>Hello Worm...  talking of bank cards - have you sought personal
>details on any other posters this week.

nope

>Any joy?

see above

>What are you going to do with them when you have collected them?

see above

>You know when you found out which pub I used and where I lived  - and
>then you said   "you may need to watch out on the way home from  the
>pub." - I never did understand what you meant.

Understanding has never been your strong point.

-- 
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:01:03 +0000, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:11:46  
>uk.net.news.moderation jms 
>
>>ffs - can you not see that I was taking the piss out of him.
>>
>>He has got an "IP address" - so what - I also can generate  several
>>million which was the point I was making.  How many did he want?
>
>I only needed one.  Place, time and person follow easily from that.

Now then Worm..

You really are intriguing me.

So you have had an email from "someone".

I would be interested in what you mean by - and how you expect to
obtain the "place, time and person"   - which you *think* is somehow
associated  with that IP address, which may or may not be associated
with that email.

Please can you help out here - as I am sure there are loads of people
who would like to know how you do that.

You obviously have a very, very cunning plan.

PS - Have I said that I think that you are a fuckwit?

Anyway - after you have answered those question - perhaps you could
explain why you broke your word.

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:06:45 +0000, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:18:32  
>uk.net.news.moderation Judith M Smith 
>
>Wm:
>>>Tell the police if necessary.
>
>>Now then Worm...
>
>>I'll leave that bit there so that people can digest it.
>>
>>Ho, ho ho - what exactly are you going to tell the police?
>
>What you have said in public.

What - all of it - or perhaps just a sentence - or an odd word or two
- or perhaps a single word?

Come on - tell me - if it was inappropriate I can retract it.

Come on now Worm...  - share it.

>>I have checked the detail of what was said:
>>
>>You said that you would let me have the details of the information
>>someone had given you on me - if I requested it by email to you.
>>
>>This I did.
>
>Send me a copy of the message in which I said those words.
>
>Clue: you can't.

Here you go:


jms : [Now about this:  " I have been given information by other
people." any chance of sharing it with me - my email address works.]

Worm : [Mine does too.  I won't tell you who said what but if you send
me an  e-mail I will provide you details that you can deny or confirm.
That  could be the end of it.]


I sent you the email

You did not provide the information.

You broke your word.

You are a liar and untrustworthy maggot.

It really is as easy as that.

(You really ought to look back over what *you* actually said at that
time - there really are one or two gems in there.  I would like to
share them with other  people - obviously here is not the best place -
can you suggest an appropriate newsgroup(s))
-- 
Latest DfT Figures: Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured:  Pedal Cyclists : 527    Pedestrians 371
All casualties:  Pedal Cyclists : 3494    Pedestrians : 1631