|
|
|
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:31:40 +0000,
group: uk.net.news.moderation
back
Legal Banter & ulm
ulm readers may be interested to know that the Legal Banter forum that
gateways to ulm is closing 31/10/2009
http://www.legalbanter.co.uk/uk-legal-legal-issues-uk/announcements.html
--
Pedt
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:31:40 +0000
author: Pedt \@ @\@some.oddities-etc.co.uk
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
Pedt <"\"@@\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote:
> ulm readers may be interested to know that the Legal Banter forum that
> gateways to ulm is closing
ITYM "overjoyed".
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:46:29 +0000
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:46:29 <1j8egrw.va7h0yak3a0pN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
uk.net.news.moderation Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
>Pedt <"\"@@\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> ulm readers may be interested to know that the Legal Banter forum that
>> gateways to ulm is closing
>
>ITYM "overjoyed".
I dunno, the guy did try and should get credit for that. ulm had some
interesting posts that it otherwise might not have got. The forum vs
moderated newsgroup was never going to work properly without a lot of
technical clue.
I have looked at the link Pedt gave and hope some of the legalbanter
people find their way to the appropriate groups without using google
groups.
I have mixed feelings about the legalbanter demise.
I'm going to miss some of the wild card postings that occasionally
emanated and the occasional joy of realising someone didn't know where
their message was being read and why they weren't getting a reply.
C'est la vie.
--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:25:00 +0000
author: Wm...
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:25:00 +0000, "Wm..."
wrote:
<snip>
> the occasional joy of realising someone didn't know where
>their message was being read and why they weren't getting a reply.
Oh yes - how we laughed.
Hello Worm... - that is oh-so-you isn't it.
Someone making a simple error - and all it does for you is give you a
laugh.
And then you have to comment on it!!
maggot.
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:57:55 +0000
author: jms
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:57:55
uk.net.news.moderation jms
>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:25:00 +0000, "Wm..."
> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> the occasional joy of realising someone didn't know where
>>their message was being read and why they weren't getting a reply.
>
>
>Oh yes - how we laughed.
>
>Hello Worm... - that is oh-so-you isn't it.
>
>Someone making a simple error - and all it does for you is give you a
>laugh.
No, fool, you had to be there at the time.
>And then you have to comment on it!!
Yes, I expect my comments regarding legalbanter some time ago were
noticed.
>maggot.
I think I have just been promoted.
--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:46:21 +0000
author: Wm...
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:46:21 +0000, "Wm..."
wrote:
>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:57:55
>uk.net.news.moderation jms
>
>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:25:00 +0000, "Wm..."
>> wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>> the occasional joy of realising someone didn't know where
>>>their message was being read and why they weren't getting a reply.
>>
>>
>>Oh yes - how we laughed.
>>
>>Hello Worm... - that is oh-so-you isn't it.
>>
>>Someone making a simple error - and all it does for you is give you a
>>laugh.
>
>No, fool, you had to be there at the time.
And that makes it better somehow does it?
I suppose you are right - it's just like people laughing and poking
fun at you in here.
Carry on.
Got any ID info' this week yet?
--
Latest DfT Figures: Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured: Pedal Cyclists : 527 Pedestrians 371
All casualties: Pedal Cyclists : 3494 Pedestrians : 1631
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:09:35 +0000
author: jms
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
On 30/10/09 12:31, Pedt wrote:
> ulm readers may be interested to know that the Legal Banter forum that
> gateways to ulm is closing 31/10/2009
is DIY banter going too? I do hope so ...
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:50:47 +0000
author: Andy Burns
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
In message , at
19:50:47 on Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Andy Burns
wibbled
>On 30/10/09 12:31, Pedt wrote:
>
>> ulm readers may be interested to know that the Legal Banter forum that
>> gateways to ulm is closing 31/10/2009
>
>is DIY banter going too? I do hope so ...
>
There doesn't appear to be a similar announcement...
--
Pedt
Edward Bulwer-Lytton - famous for being the first to start a novel with the
corniest opening sentence.
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:51:27 +0000
author: Pedt \@ @\@some.oddities-etc.co.uk
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
In message , Wm...
writes
>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:57:55
>uk.net.news.moderation jms
>>Hello Worm... - that is oh-so-you isn't it.
>>maggot.
>
>I think I have just been promoted.
Perhaps she is hoping you'll pupate?
--
< Paul >
date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:31:00 +0000
author: Paul C. Dickie
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
Wm... wrote:
> Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:46:29 <1j8egrw.va7h0yak3a0pN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
> uk.net.news.moderation Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
>
>> Pedt <"\"@@\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> ulm readers may be interested to know that the Legal Banter forum that
>>> gateways to ulm is closing
>>
>> ITYM "overjoyed".
>
> I dunno, the guy did try and should get credit for that. ulm had some
> interesting posts that it otherwise might not have got. The forum vs
> moderated newsgroup was never going to work properly without a lot of
> technical clue.
Fair point - it'll simplify things a bit though
date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:53:49 -0000
author: Steve Walker
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
In message , Steve Walker
writes
>Wm... wrote:
>> Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:46:29 <1j8egrw.va7h0yak3a0pN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
>> uk.net.news.moderation Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
>>> Pedt <"\"@@\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> ulm readers may be interested to know that the Legal Banter forum that
>>>> gateways to ulm is closing
>>>
>>> ITYM "overjoyed".
>>
>> I dunno, the guy did try and should get credit for that. ulm had some
>> interesting posts that it otherwise might not have got. The forum vs
>> moderated newsgroup was never going to work properly without a lot of
>> technical clue.
>
>Fair point - it'll simplify things a bit though
As one door closes...
http://myreader.co.uk/gp/1304-1.aspx
--
< Paul >
date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:31:09 +0000
author: Paul C. Dickie
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
In message , Steve Walker
writes
>Fair point - it'll simplify things a bit though
As one door closes...
http://myreader.co.uk/gp/1304-1.aspx
--
< Paul >
date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:48:26 +0000
author: Paul C. Dickie
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
In message <kLUsu3raQf7KFw+o@bozzie.unospace.net>, at 20:48:26 on Sun, 1
Nov 2009, Paul C. Dickie wibbled
>In message , Steve Walker
> writes
>>Fair point - it'll simplify things a bit though
>
>As one door closes...
>
>http://myreader.co.uk/gp/1304-1.aspx
>
Yes, you said so yesterday. However, you are implying it's new. MyReader
has been around for a while.
--
Pedt
date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:29:41 +0000
author: Pedt \@ @\@some.oddities-etc.co.uk
|
Re: Legal Banter & ulm
In message <jJjpjI+F3f7KFwfq@fishcake.eternal-september.org>, Pedt <"\"@
@\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> writes
>In message <kLUsu3raQf7KFw+o@bozzie.unospace.net>, at 20:48:26 on Sun,
>1 Nov 2009, Paul C. Dickie wibbled
>>In message , Steve Walker
>> writes
>>>Fair point - it'll simplify things a bit though
>>
>>As one door closes...
>>
>>http://myreader.co.uk/gp/1304-1.aspx
>>
>Yes, you said so yesterday.
I needed to change the email address under which it appeared.
>However, you are implying it's new. MyReader has been around for a
>while.
It may have been, but it popped up recently in uk.legal
--
< Paul >
date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:01:20 +0000
author: Paul C. Dickie
|
|
|