Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:48:37 -0700 (PDT), Simon Brooke
wrote:
>On 29 Oct, 00:54, "Clive George" wrote:
>>
>> If we're talking about Simon here, I strongly believe based on past
>> interaction (several years worth on URC) that power and prestige aren't
>> behind why he's doing this. Being pissed off at the state of URC caused by
>> jms was the main driver.
>
>While being pissed off with the state of trolling on URC was indeed
>the main driver, recall that I had largely ceased posting to it (or
>reading it very much) long before Judith came on the scene. The usual
>suspects were perfectly capable of creating endless and pointless
>flamewars without any help from her.
You'll be missed on urc - I liked when you said :
"I believe that if I am driving or cycling there is no chance of a
child running out in front of me and causing an accident."
I feel it said oh so much about you in oh so few words.
Anyway - back to moderation: Do you think that you are arrogant at
all?
PS If you're not using your sig - I will - if that's OK?
--
"It's much better if the moderators are mysterious and arbitrary, and
every moderation decision is unexplained and final. "
Simon Brooke URCM Moderator
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:35:07 +0000
author: jms
|