On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:54:43 -0000, "Clive George"
 wrote:

<snip>


>If we're talking about Simon here, I strongly believe based on past 
>interaction (several years worth on URC) that power and prestige aren't 
>behind why he's doing this. Being pissed off at the state of URC caused by 
>jms was the main driver.


Here we go again - it was all Judith Smith's fault; yes of course it
was.


Did you not read my response to the points you made to The Todal?

They obviously did not sink in.


Do you not see yourself, Chapman, and others to be to blame.


Previous regulars have already stated that the group had been going
down-hill due  to a clique mentality - months before I appeared on the
scene.


If you really think that *I* have the ability to destroy a newsgroup
single handedly - then many thanks for recognising my ability.

On the other hand you may just be wrong.

--  

British Medical Association (BMA)
View on helmets:

Several studies provided solid scientific evidence that bicycle helmets
protect against head, brain, severe brain and facial injuries,
as well as death, as a result of cycling accidents

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:55:09 +0000, jms wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:54:43 -0000, "Clive George"
>  wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> 
>>If we're talking about Simon here, I strongly believe based on past 
>>interaction (several years worth on URC) that power and prestige aren't 
>>behind why he's doing this. Being pissed off at the state of URC caused by 
>>jms was the main driver.
> 
> 
> Here we go again - it was all Judith Smith's fault; yes of course it
> was.
> 
> 
> Did you not read my response to the points you made to The Todal?
> 
> They obviously did not sink in.
> 
> 
> Do you not see yourself, Chapman, and others to be to blame.
> 
> 
> Previous regulars have already stated that the group had been going
> down-hill due  to a clique mentality - months before I appeared on the
> scene.
> 
> 
> If you really think that *I* have the ability to destroy a newsgroup
> single handedly - then many thanks for recognising my ability.
> 
> On the other hand you may just be wrong.

D'you know, you have the most balanced view of everybody contributing. It
must come from the monumental chips you're carrying on each shoulder.

-- 
The Wanderer

I have seen the truth - it doesn't make sense

On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:53:20 +0000, Mark McNeill wrote:

> Response to Wm...:
> 
>> We've (or at least I) never quite been able to work out what the
>> jms's problem with cyclists is.  The fact that the problem is
>> transferable to other groups and other people suggests to me a mirror
>> might be useful for the jms
> 
> Dedicated moaners like jms could certainly learn from the old chestnut:
> 
> "Doc, it hurts wherever I touch."
> "That's because your finger's broken."

The more I've read of the jms postings, the more I am minded of the proud
mum watching her squaddie son marching on parade with his fellow soldiers -
'Ooh look, my son's the only one in step!'


-- 
The Wanderer

Whenever I look for something, it's always in the last place I look.

On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:28:48 +0000, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:23:23  
>uk.net.news.moderation The Wanderer 
>
>
>>D'you know, you have the most balanced view of everybody contributing. It
>>must come from the monumental chips you're carrying on each shoulder.
>
>We've (or at least I) never quite been able to work out what the jms's 
>problem with cyclists is.  The fact that the problem is transferable to 
>other groups and other people suggests to me a mirror might be useful 
>for the jms ... and possibly a little less drink.


Hello Worm...

In a nutshell - I dislike liars and fuckwits.

You may find that that is a common thread which runs through many
posts I make.

Many cyclists who post here  are in both of those categories (and of
course many are not)

You certainly are - but with the added value  of  being truly
dishonest and dishonourable.