On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:55:24 +0000, Tom Crispin
<kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:

>ITYM the titanium list.  Or is it the arborium list?

Unobtainium, surely?  But a bonus point for the Yehuda reference :-)
 
Guy
-- 
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:07:51 +0000, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:06:33  
>uk.net.news.moderation "Just zis Guy, you know?" 
>
>
>>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:55:24 +0000, Tom Crispin
>><kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>>
>>>ITYM the titanium list.  Or is it the arborium list?
>>
>>Unobtainium, surely?  But a bonus point for the Yehuda reference :-)
>
>If this goes the way of bank cards soon there will be a black list.


Hello Worm...  talking of bank cards - have you sought personal
details on any other posters this week.

Any joy?

What are you going to do with them when you have collected them?

You know when you found out which pub I used and where I lived  - and
then you said   "you may need to watch out on the way home from  the
pub." - I never did understand what you meant.
-- 
Latest DfT Figures: Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured:  Pedal Cyclists : 527    Pedestrians 371
All casualties:  Pedal Cyclists : 3494    Pedestrians : 1631

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:32:43 +0000, "Wm..."
 wrote:

<snip>


>>You know when you found out which pub I used and where I lived  - and
>>then you said   "you may need to watch out on the way home from  the
>>pub." - I never did understand what you meant.
>
>Understanding has never been your strong point.


Hello again Worm...

In  which case, perhaps you can explain precisely what you meant then.
Just so that there was no misunderstanding.

I think I know what you meant- but other people here may not
understand.

So let's be having it.

-- 
Latest DfT Figures: Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured:  Pedal Cyclists : 527    Pedestrians 371
All casualties:  Pedal Cyclists : 3494    Pedestrians : 1631

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:49:08 +0000, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:55:07  
>uk.net.news.moderation jms 
>
>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:32:43 +0000, "Wm..."
>> wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>
>>>>You know when you found out which pub I used and where I lived  - and
>>>>then you said   "you may need to watch out on the way home from  the
>>>>pub." - I never did understand what you meant.
>>>
>>>Understanding has never been your strong point.
>>
>>
>>Hello again Worm...
>>
>>In  which case, perhaps you can explain precisely what you meant then.
>>Just so that there was no misunderstanding.
>>
>>I think I know what you meant- but other people here may not
>>understand.
>>
>>So let's be having it.
>
>I think you are the only person that doesn't understand.  I'll leave it 
>at that.


Hello Worm...

In which case - that's really odd - I am surprised that there isn't
anyone else out there who understands what it meant who could be kind
enough to help.

"you may need to watch out on the way home from  the pub."

Was it a threat of some sort?

-- 
Latest DfT Figures: Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured:  Pedal Cyclists : 527    Pedestrians 371
All casualties:  Pedal Cyclists : 3494    Pedestrians : 1631

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:48:04 +0000, "Wm...the lying fuckwit"
 wrote:

>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:16:22  
>uk.net.news.moderation jms 
>
>>Was it a threat of some sort?
>
>The person that has the details has chosen not to be named, I respect 
>that.  This only became important to me because you started digging at 
>my family and lovers, leave other people out of it and I am happy to 
>play without gloves.

Now then Worm...

You are indeed a maggot.

You actually promised to send me the details - even if you withheld
your source - if I emailed you.

I emailed you.

You refuse to give me the details  you had promised.

You broke your word.

You are quite dishonourable.

-- 
Latest DfT Figures: Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured:  Pedal Cyclists : 527    Pedestrians 371
All casualties:  Pedal Cyclists : 3494    Pedestrians : 1631

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:06:03 +0000, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:53:18  
>uk.net.news.moderation jms 
>
>>You actually promised to send me the details - even if you withheld
>>your source - if I emailed you.
>>
>>I emailed you.
>
>I got what I wanted, an IP address in case you carried on getting 
>stranger.
>
>>You refuse to give me the details  you had promised.
>>
>>You broke your word.
>>
>>You are quite dishonourable.
>
>Sigh, are mirrors not available to you?
>
>What I and you and everyone else writes gets read by thousands of people 
>each day.
>
>You are the only person where I have felt it necessary to get an IP 
>address "just in case".
>
>Think, please.


You are actually a fool.  You have got an IP address "just in case".

Do you collect them - how many do you want?

Actually - let's pretend that you have an IP address which someone has
used in the past. Even pretend it is an address I may have used in the
past.  What exactly are you going to do with it?

You are actually quite pathetic as well as a dishonourable liar.

We had an agreement in good faith.

You broke it.

Please explain.

(PS I really do like that blue colour)

--  

British Medical Association (BMA)
View on helmets:

Several studies provided solid scientific evidence that bicycle helmets
protect against head, brain, severe brain and facial injuries,
as well as death, as a result of cycling accidents

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:50:11 +0000, %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
wrote:

>jms  wrote:
>
>> You are actually a fool.  You have got an IP address "just in case".
>> 
>> Do you collect them - how many do you want?
>
>Ummm well... I'm not he but I've got access to several million IP
>addresses.
>
>If you're going to pick arguments with people, as is your right, try to
>pick subjects that you can speak on without making yourself look like a
>drivelling idiot.


ffs - can you not see that I was taking the piss out of him.

He has got an "IP address" - so what - I also can generate  several
million which was the point I was making.  How many did he want?

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:11:04 +0000, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:51:36  
>uk.net.news.moderation jms 
>
>>Do you collect them - how many do you want?
>
>Just yours so far.
>
>>Actually - let's pretend that you have an IP address which someone has
>>used in the past. Even pretend it is an address I may have used in the
>>past.  What exactly are you going to do with it?
>
>Tell the police if necessary.


Now then Worm...


I'll leave that bit there so that people can digest it.

Ho, ho ho - what exactly are you going to tell the police?

I have checked the detail of what was said:

You said that you would let me have the details of the information
someone had given you on me - if I requested it by email to you.

This I did.

You did not provide the information.

You broke your word.

You are a liar and untrustworthy maggot.




-- 
Latest DfT Figures: Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured:  Pedal Cyclists : 527    Pedestrians 371
All casualties:  Pedal Cyclists : 3494    Pedestrians : 1631

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:18:32  
uk.net.news.moderation Judith M Smith 

Wm:
>>Tell the police if necessary.

>Now then Worm...

>I'll leave that bit there so that people can digest it.
>
>Ho, ho ho - what exactly are you going to tell the police?

What you have said in public.

>I have checked the detail of what was said:
>
>You said that you would let me have the details of the information
>someone had given you on me - if I requested it by email to you.
>
>This I did.

Send me a copy of the message in which I said those words.

Clue: you can't.

>You did not provide the information.
>
>You broke your word.
>
>You are a liar and untrustworthy maggot.

Maggot or worm I am better than you.

-- 
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:11:46  
uk.net.news.moderation jms 

>ffs - can you not see that I was taking the piss out of him.
>
>He has got an "IP address" - so what - I also can generate  several
>million which was the point I was making.  How many did he want?

I only needed one.  Place, time and person follow easily from that.

-- 
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days