Re: Ex cathedra: Use of signatures
In message , Tom Crispin
<kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> writes
>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:56:31 +0000, Simon Brooke
><stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>This is posted on behalf of the moderators as a whole. Followups are set,
>>please observe this.
>>
>> 'We have rejected an otherwise useful message because of a deliberately
>> controversial signature file. Please consider whether your signature
>> file is suitable for this group.'
>
>Isn't "ex cathedra" and "on behalf of the moderators" an oxymoron?
>
>My understanding is that "ex cathedra", by definition, has to come
>from one person, literally, "from the chair".
Rather than "from the person on the throne"?
But that might raise a question of whether he'd flushed it afterwards.
--
< Paul >
date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:41:19 +0000
author: Paul C. Dickie
|