Response to Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid>:

> I don't read urd.  I don't believe that we should have 'taboo'
> subjects on urcm.  Helmets and Speed limits are relevant to cycling in
> the UK.

I'd be very concerned if there were taboo cycling-related subjects on
urcm; I'd be very surprised if some subjects weren't *very* closely
monitored, particularly in the early days.


> During the discussion on the RFD everyone seemed in agreement that
> moderation would be "light" and only abusive, trolling and
> continuously repetetive posts would be rejected.  This does not seem
> to be happening right now IMHO.

That's not how I remember it at all, though if anyone wants to trawl
through the RFD threads I may well turn out to be wrong.

I do remember several people, including myself, expressing fears of moderation,
combined with hopes that the moderation would be light; and I'm fairly
sure that the proponent[s] didn't promise any such thing.  I probably
wouldn't have, in their position.


-- 
Mark, UK.