On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:08:18 +0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

> On 27 Oct 2009 13:32:07 GMT, Simon Brooke <stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>The first group don't need an explanation and the second won't accept
>>one (or believe one if given) so explanations just erode the signal to
>>noise ratio and have no benefit.
> 
> Nonsense.

Quod erat demonstrandum

-- 
stillyet@googlemail.com (Simon Brooke) http://www.journeyman.cc/~simon/
It's much better if the moderators are mysterious and arbitrary, and 
every moderation decision is unexplained and final.