In message , at 19:43:08 on Mon, 26 
Oct 2009, Simon Brooke <stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com> wibbled
>On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:37:19 +0000, Tom Crispin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:35:07 +0000, Pedt <"\"@
>> @\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>You appear to be suggesting that urcm operates on a) You're on the
>>>auto/pass list and your post goes through on the nod (unless you hit a
>>>trigger word perhaps, it's not been mentioned about triggers);
>>>b) if you are not in a) then your post goes through a moderator who
>>>makes a decision on the post;
>>>c) people can be put on a watch list over and above b) d) blacklisted.
>>
>> That is how I interpreted Simon's explanation.
>
>That's correct.
>
I'd still like to know the rationale behind c). There must be a better 
rationale than the two (unposted) that I can currently think of.

Not interested in urcm as a group but I am interested in moderation per 
se (or I wouldn't be posting here).

-- 
Pedt