Re: uklm moderator lack of impartiality
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:07:55 +0100, "Paul C. Dickie"
wrote:
>In message , smr
> writes
>>Adam Funk wrote:
>>> On 2009-10-09, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>>> So it doesn't affect the newsgroup directly, it just means that the
>>>> Legalbanter users' view of the group is inaccurate and misleading.
>>>
>>> Well, it does cause trouble for the moderators.
>>
>>It doesn't really. It just causes legalbanter to receive all the blocked
>>posts. In theory that's a lower quality service. Just imagine how long
>>their Cycle Helmets thread is!
>
>Look on the bright side: at least jms doesn't use it. :-D
Ho, ho, ho - you are realy very funny.
date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:34:31 +0100
author: Judith M Smith
|