|
|
|
date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:59:20 -0000,
group: uk.net.news.moderation
back
U.L.M. - delays in arriving
Hi,
I posted something to uk.legal.moderation 43 minutes ago and it still hasn't
arrived on the list for moderation yet. The last one arriving on the list
for moderation arrived at 00:30. I wonder if there's a hiccup somewhere.
Iain
date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:59:20 -0000
author: Iain
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
"Iain" wrote in message
news:5rkj7dF14klg1U1@mid.individual.net...
> Hi,
>
> I posted something to uk.legal.moderation 43 minutes ago and it still
> hasn't arrived on the list for moderation yet. The last one arriving on
> the list for moderation arrived at 00:30. I wonder if there's a hiccup
> somewhere.
>
> Iain
It's now 32 hours since the last post appeared on the list for moderation
and 23.1/2 hours since I started sending emails to the email addresses
http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.legal.moderated.html
No action nor response yet.
Iain
date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:51:07 -0000
author: Iain
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
"Iain" wrote in message
news:5rnakfF15dd6vU1@mid.individual.net...
> "Iain" wrote in message
> news:5rkj7dF14klg1U1@mid.individual.net...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I posted something to uk.legal.moderation 43 minutes ago and it still
>> hasn't arrived on the list for moderation yet. The last one arriving on
>> the list for moderation arrived at 00:30. I wonder if there's a hiccup
>> somewhere.
>>
>> Iain
>
> It's now 32 hours since the last post appeared on the list for moderation
> and 23.1/2 hours since I started sending emails to the email addresses
> http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.legal.moderated.html
>
> No action nor response yet.
I wonder if the Gradwell server is malfunctioning. I'll try emailing Mr
Ashton.
date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:42:23 -0000
author: The Todal
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
"The Todal" wrote in message
news:5rno38F15h2l4U1@mid.individual.net...
> I wonder if the Gradwell server is malfunctioning. I'll try emailing Mr
> Ashton.
Thanks
Iain
date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:21:52 -0000
author: Iain
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
In uk.net.news.moderation on Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:59:20 -0000, "Iain"
wrote:
}I posted something to uk.legal.moderation 43 minutes ago and it still hasn't
}arrived on the list for moderation yet. The last one arriving on the list
}for moderation arrived at 00:30. I wonder if there's a hiccup somewhere.
Something broke. I am not exactly sure what - but I have fixed it and it is
all OK now. Sorry about that.
{R}
date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:24:52 +0000
author: {R}
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
"{R}" wrote in message
news:8lndl31f1j2v2t13648r8i8ol4tmk7dcnm@4ax.com...
> In uk.net.news.moderation on Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:59:20 -0000, "Iain"
> wrote:
>
> }I posted something to uk.legal.moderation 43 minutes ago and it still
> hasn't
> }arrived on the list for moderation yet. The last one arriving on the
> list
> }for moderation arrived at 00:30. I wonder if there's a hiccup somewhere.
>
> Something broke. I am not exactly sure what - but I have fixed it and it
> is
> all OK now. Sorry about that.
>
> {R}
Yup - all come through now.
Thanks
Iain
date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:40:58 -0000
author: Iain
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:40:58 -0000, "Iain" wrote:
>Yup - all come through now.
I don't think they have. One of my posts has gone missing.
Mike.
date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:59:24 +0000
author: Mike
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 21:59:24
uk.net.news.moderation Mike
>On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:40:58 -0000, "Iain" wrote:
>
>>Yup - all come through now.
>
>I don't think they have. One of my posts has gone missing.
This one or another?
===
From: Mike
Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated
Subject: Re: cancelling a tv licence
X-Posted-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:24:07 +0000
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 21:35:05 +0000
X-Original-Trace: 1196890202 news.aaisp.net.uk 508 81.187.197.219:58722
X-Robomod-Trace: 3497920071205213506auto
X-Trace: 1196890507 news.gradwell.net 514 corixa/193.111.200.20:2719
===
There is a gap but I am not sure if I should be bothered to examine it
yet.
--
Wm ... Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days
date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 22:51:20 +0000
author: Wm...
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 22:51:20 +0000, "Wm..."
wrote:
>
>uk.net.news.moderation Mike
>>
>>I don't think they have. One of my posts has gone missing.
>
>This one or another?
>===
>From: Mike
>Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated
>Subject: Re: cancelling a tv licence
>X-Posted-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:24:07 +0000
>Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 21:35:05 +0000
>X-Original-Trace: 1196890202 news.aaisp.net.uk 508 81.187.197.219:58722
>X-Robomod-Trace: 3497920071205213506auto
>X-Trace: 1196890507 news.gradwell.net 514 corixa/193.111.200.20:2719
>===
>
>There is a gap but I am not sure if I should be bothered to examine it
>yet.
That post didn't go missing - did you think it had?
No, the one that never appeared was posted to the "Requiring evidence
of name change" thread at 21:38 on 4th December. Since it went
missing within Gradwell's servers, you (I presume?) won't have access
to it.
Mike.
date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:51:38 +0000
author: Mike
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:51:38
uk.net.news.moderation Mike
>On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 22:51:20 +0000, "Wm..."
> wrote:
>
>>
>>uk.net.news.moderation Mike
>>>
>>>I don't think they have. One of my posts has gone missing.
>>
>>This one or another?
>>===
>>From: Mike
>>Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated
>>Subject: Re: cancelling a tv licence
>>X-Posted-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:24:07 +0000
>>Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 21:35:05 +0000
>>X-Original-Trace: 1196890202 news.aaisp.net.uk 508 81.187.197.219:58722
>>X-Robomod-Trace: 3497920071205213506auto
>>X-Trace: 1196890507 news.gradwell.net 514 corixa/193.111.200.20:2719
>>===
>>
>>There is a gap but I am not sure if I should be bothered to examine it
>>yet.
>
>That post didn't go missing - did you think it had?
No, I was wondering if you had written here before seeing it in ulm.
>No, the one that never appeared was posted to the "Requiring evidence
>of name change" thread at 21:38 on 4th December. Since it went
>missing within Gradwell's servers, you (I presume?) won't have access
>to it.
Correct. What I can look at are the gaps if anyone is sufficiently
interested. On the other hand if people accept that their postings have
been eaten somewhere inside Gradwell I'll leave it at that.
--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days
date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:19:13 +0000
author: Wm...
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:19:13 +0000, "Wm..."
wrote:
>Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:51:38
>
>uk.net.news.moderation Mike
>
>>No, the one that never appeared was posted to the "Requiring evidence
>>of name change" thread at 21:38 on 4th December. Since it went
>>missing within Gradwell's servers, you (I presume?) won't have access
>>to it.
>
>Correct. What I can look at are the gaps if anyone is sufficiently
>interested. On the other hand if people accept that their postings have
>been eaten somewhere inside Gradwell I'll leave it at that.
My postings to ulm are sent direct to Gradwell's servers and I have
acknowledgement of receipt (since I run my own mail and news servers),
so that's the only place it can have gone missing.
It would be interesting if Gradwell / {R} have an explanation but only
in the "idle interest" sense.
Mike.
date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:47:09 +0000
author: Mike
|
Re: U.L.M. - delays in arriving
Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:47:09
uk.net.news.moderation Mike
>On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:19:13 +0000, "Wm..."
> wrote:
>
>>Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:51:38
>>
>>uk.net.news.moderation Mike
>>
>>>No, the one that never appeared was posted to the "Requiring evidence
>>>of name change" thread at 21:38 on 4th December. Since it went
>>>missing within Gradwell's servers, you (I presume?) won't have access
>>>to it.
>>
>>Correct. What I can look at are the gaps if anyone is sufficiently
>>interested. On the other hand if people accept that their postings have
>>been eaten somewhere inside Gradwell I'll leave it at that.
>
>My postings to ulm are sent direct to Gradwell's servers and I have
>acknowledgement of receipt (since I run my own mail and news servers),
>so that's the only place it can have gone missing.
>
>It would be interesting if Gradwell / {R} have an explanation but only
>in the "idle interest" sense.
"Idle interest" is a fair summary of the latest issue for me, you are
savvy enough to repost and if someone else moans here they should be
able to do so too.
I didn't see enough people moaning to look further but thought it good
manners to ask if you or someone else wanted someone else to look.
--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days
date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 23:10:32 +0000
author: Wm...
|
|
|
