On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:08:34 +0000, Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid>
wrote:

>In uk.net.news.management on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:40:31 +0000, Molly
>Mockford  wrote:
>
>> At 23:38:02 on Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Cherry Chapstick 
>> <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote in 
>> :
>>
>>>The committee could be more active in persuading users to propose
>>>groups or rm groups.
>>
>> The Committee could go out every Friday and have a jolly good lunch.
>
>Surely that would be an insult to the BH inflight catering facilities?
>
>> Neither of those things happen to be within the Committee's remit.
>>
>> By the way, in the spirit of everything being open and above-board, it 
>> occurs to  me to wonder whether you have a name?  Or do you always hide 
>> behind that nym?
>
>Now that's unfair, IMO. There are enough scare stories in the media
>about the Internet to make a desire for privacy understandable.


Indeed - if the chiark posse get elected - then they will be asking
for suggestions from their colleagues.

Simon Brooke:

"Personally if I was all powerful my moderation policy would simply be
to require every person who contributed to discussion to publish a
verifiably correct real world home address where they actually lived,
and then let them get on with the debate."

--    
I believe that if I am driving or cycling there is no chance of a child running out in front of me and causing an accident.
Simon Brooke.